Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,221
- Reaction score
- 42,788
Dog bite would be a civil issue.
https://www.upi.com/Sports_News/NFL...-dog-after-neighborhood-attack/5981554480368/
Dog bite would be a civil issue.
“Not to be sexist, but here’s a sexist statement”
Jiminy Christmas
Always something with this dude.
Love ya like a brother, but with your sig and avatar? lol“Not to be sexist, but here’s a sexist statement”
Jiminy Christmas
8-8 and missed the playoffs. Didn’t show up in the season finale for the 2nd straight year. He was on the milk carton until this incident.Yep, he's always up to something that dude....
Your point?
Regardless if they were involved or not, they wouldn’t arrest him for the dog bite. Dog bites are civil issues not criminal.Police were involved with Dak's dog attack.........
Dog bite would be a civil issue.
Some? Yes.Twitter is such a detriment to some people.
He's not the QB if you didn't know who are the leaders of any offense ....sorry man you missed again!8-8 and missed the playoffs. Didn’t show up in the season finale for the 2nd straight year. He was on the milk carton until this incident.
Police were called, so police got involved. They probably took statements from any parties of interest and left. It's possible they even asked to see the dogs, so they could give a somewhat informed opinion as to the nature of the beasts. None of that means charges were filed though.Police were involved with Dak's dog attack.........
Dog bite would be a civil issue.
Regardless if they were involved or not, they wouldn’t arrest him for the dog bite. Dog bites are civil issues not criminal.
Police were called, so police got involved. They probably took statements from any parties of interest and left. It's possibly they even asked to see the dogs, so they could give a somewhat informed opinion as to the nature of the beasts. None of that means charges were filed though.
"Blaming the victim," as it is too often used, is a terrible phrase. A blight on humanity. It assumes that the person making a claim is a victim.So Zeke isn’t responding to the dog attack, he’s responding to someone wishing that it was their relative who had been attacked, so they could get a payoff.
In context Zeke’s tweet is reasonable.
Out of context it looks like he is blaming the victim.
Read the first paragraph of that. It's repeat offenders and people who knowingly keep vicious dogs who risk criminal charges.
Always something with this dude.
ExactlySome? Yes.
Most? Definitely yes.
Good! What else is there to do?????Always something with this dude.