OmerV
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 25,899
- Reaction score
- 22,430
Those are reasonable thoughts. There can be a boatload of things to consider, and that’s why I generally don’t understand the thought of some that there can be a clear, unquestioned distinction on who is the best at a given time.Agreed but I also think the O line, again, is a large factor of stamina and carrying the workload. Guys like Barkley, or Bell with the Jets, or any other RB with a bad O line have to work a lot harder most games, and over the course of a season, just to get positive yards. They are also much more prone to injury.
Occasionally one stands so far out that a reasonable distinction can be made, but often I t’s not that easy to definitively factor in the effects of all thing - talent, opportunity, offensive scheme, O-Line, how much defensive attention the players get, strength of schedule, weighing in rushing, receiving and blocking, being a grinder versus being a speed guy, health, ability to carry a big workload, instincts, vision, and on and on and on ...
In most cases reasonable people can reach different conclusions.