News: The Real Reason We Didn't Sign Dak?

ROUSH8692

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,580
Reaction score
359
https://arkansasrazorbacks.com/roster/john-stephen-jones/

Now hear me out. With Dak most likely playing on the franchise tag this year and next year. The grandson will be draft eligible after the 2021 season the same time it will be financially unfeasible to tag Dak a 3rd time. The timing lines up perfectly and Jerry and Stephen are idiots who have a history of letting Nepotism run wild in the organization.


Cam Newton got league minimum and he has been to a super bowl. I wish we had let Dak test the market.... He and that coward Tad would've been running back with their tails between their legs begging for a job just like Dez Bryant did
 

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,916
Reaction score
22,440
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cam Newton got league minimum and he has been to a super bowl. I wish we had let Dak test the market.... He and that coward Tad would've been running back with their tails between their legs begging for a job just like Dez Bryant did
Players don't get big contracts for what they did 5 years ago. Newton is 31, coming off an injury plagued season, and has been very ordinary since the Super Bowl anyway, so he is in the unfortunate position of having to re-prove himself. He also may have taken lesser pay for a chance to step into the winning tradition in New England knowing that if things work out a big payday could come next year. He also has incentives built into his deal that could significantly increase his pay.
 
Last edited:

Jarv

Loud pipes saves lives.
Messages
13,182
Reaction score
7,872
None of them in my opinion really worth it . That doesn’t change the fact that Prescott is a winner. Never had a losing season. Even under the great Jason Garrett LOL
He's never won a championship at any level.
 

Hennessy_King

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,625
Reaction score
25,418
You don't have the goods to even understand what you witnessed. Drunk tweeting doesn't serve you well.
Lol not a single person liked any of your tweets. The same rejects liking all your posts here have given you a false confidence that doesnt exist outside of this little bubble where the mods protect you and the rest of the rejects. Ill see you on twitter bum
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
The difference between Dallas at 26.19 and the average starting FP of 28.41 is a matter of two yards, meaning statistically insignificant. Dallas was 16th in the red zone and 22nd on the road, meaning when they got near to the TD, which is un-related to starting FP, they couldn’t put the ball in the end-zone.

Dallas was actually fifth at plays per drive, a half a drive more than the average, and had 170 drives, 14 MORE than the SB winning champions, the Chiefs.
You’re going to compare the entire league to win team. Stop it ridiculous. With them it was one out of every four drives. Plus it was every single one. You made people think you know nothing about the game. Stupid statistic
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
The difference between Dallas at 26.19 and the average starting FP of 28.41 is a matter of two yards, meaning statistically insignificant. Dallas was 16th in the red zone and 22nd on the road, meaning when they got near to the TD, which is un-related to starting FP, they couldn’t put the ball in the end-zone.

Dallas was actually fifth at plays per drive, a half a drive more than the average, and had 170 drives, 14 MORE than the SB winning champions, the Chiefs.
Can’t score in scoring position. That’s because Elliot was gassed from running all the extra yardage getting there. Again you just don’t get it. Anything to rag on Prescott I understand that But in reality it just makes you seem a knowledgeable ignorant of the game
 

Whirlwin

Cowboy , It’s a way of life.
Messages
23,977
Reaction score
16,255
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
The difference between Dallas at 26.19 and the average starting FP of 28.41 is a matter of two yards, meaning statistically insignificant. Dallas was 16th in the red zone and 22nd on the road, meaning when they got near to the TD, which is un-related to starting FP, they couldn’t put the ball in the end-zone.

Dallas was actually fifth at plays per drive, a half a drive more than the average, and had 170 drives, 14 MORE than the SB winning champions, the Chiefs.
Look I understand you must have some knowledge of the game. Fifth at plays pretty drive. What does that tell you. There was an extra eight Plays per drive. And because we kept it longer just showed how much better of an offense we were only to fail in the red zone. You’re just making up something that sounds good but it’s ridiculous in actuality. We only started one drive on the opponents side of the field last season and that is a fact. Set that in your statistical hat
 

Jarv

Loud pipes saves lives.
Messages
13,182
Reaction score
7,872
So that makes him a loser. Stop it
Stop what, stating facts. You called him a winner at every level, but don't have championships to back it up.

Dak's a good QB, so are a lot of QBs. He wants to be paid like a champion, but he isn't one.

Your just whirling in the wind again son, Bring me a trophy Dak, otherwise team friendly deal or leave.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,327
Reaction score
43,225

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,822
Reaction score
34,962
LOL, well, Jim Garrett was with the Cleveland Browns when Jason enrolled at Princeton. In fact, Jim Garrett had been away from New Jersey for over a decade when Jason entered Princeton, and then only a few years working for the Giants. Before Jason entered Princeton he had been away from New Jersey for all but 3 years since the late 1940's.

Besides, knowing "jersey football" doesn't mean a person knows everything that happens with every school or team in Jersey.

In addition, it appears Jason did well in football at Princeton, and I've seen nothing to suggest he struggled academically, so why is it so hard to believe Princeton actually wanted him to attend?

Now, if you have some actual evidence that suggests Jason only got into Princeton because of some connection his Dad had, feel free to show it and I will consider it and concede the point if warranted, but the simple fact Jim Garrett was originally from New Jersey doesn't qualify.

When Jim Garrett went to Columbia, all three of his sons followed, including from Princeton. When their dad got fired after going winless, they all transferred back to Princeton.

I wouldn’t doubt that Jim Garrett had some ties to Princeton, considering they are pretty much Jersey boys. It’s either the Giants or Cowboys, and Jason returned to coach where his father coached. He also ended up there as a player after the Cowboys. It’s obvious Jim must have had strong ties to the Mara family as well.
 
Last edited:

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,822
Reaction score
34,962
Let me tell you the issue here........

He posted a website.

It as his attempt to crap on Dak.

That's fine.

A poster asks him "Where does Dak compare to other quarterbacks in the league"......

He responded with "He's right there with Ryan Fitzpatrick". Which was correct. From within the 20 Ryan Fitzpatrick had a completion rate of 55% and 16 Touchdowns and 1 pick. Dak had 52% with 16 touchdowns and no picks.

Knowing his history of lying I checked the link and found out Dak actually had a better completion than both Russell Wilson and Patrick Mahomes at 49% and 51% respectively. So Ryan Fitzpatrick was better than both those guys which shows this has no bearing on how good of a quarterback you are.

1. Where is the lie and where is the history of lying? Bring the quote...

2. So I provided the link when I was asked Dak was mediocre in the red-zone like Ryan Fitzpatrick and I was right, so how is that lying? RF shares the same EXACT percentage from 0-10 yards out as Dak.

3. So if Wilson and Mahomes were mediocre in the red zone, how does that make Dak not mediocre? How does it make it a lie? If Mahomes was mediocre and Wilson were mediocre, how come Dallas was 17th in scoring at home and 22nd on the road in scoring from the red-zone whole KC was 11 and Seattle was 5 and Mahomes didn’t even play a full season.

4. Russell Wilson threw over 60.61% from 10 yards out while Dak threw 47.62%. RW threw 15 TDs while Dak threw 7. RW threw 25 TDs while Dak threw 16 while in the 20. Please explain to me how Dak is better? Dak has thrown for 50% in the red zone two years running, while Mahomes through 50 TDs and was over 70% last year, Dak never putting up close to those numbers, and to end the season, in the last three games was like 80% and he then continued on to win the SB in his second year. So how is Dak better? RW threw close to 70 passes less than Dak and Mahomes less than around 100 and these QBs still put up more points in the red zone than Dak, despite all of Dak’s adding yards and inflated stats.

5. Notice that the red zone includes from 10 yards out.

6. Notice how you didn’t complain that “your boy”, you is your cheerleader and he is your cheerleader, posted a stat of Dak throwing 8 TD passes from 1-2 yards out. That’s not even 10 yards.
 
Last edited:

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,822
Reaction score
34,962
Dak couldn’t find the end zone in 2018 with Jarwin. He’s been 50% two years running in the red zone.

Teams are DARING Dak to beat them in the red zone, by spying on him. They’ve taken away his legs, which is why he’s only scored 3 TDs last year and one of them was a 42 yarder. Guy rushed only 5 less than his first year and had his worse rushing stats of his career.

Thats not RW nor Mahomes. Neither of them has the rushing attack Dak has.
 
Last edited:

LACowboysFan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,048
Reaction score
7,177
Dak couldn’t find the end zone in 2018 with Jarwin. He’s been 50% two years running in the red zone.

Teams are DARING Dak to beat them in the red zone, by spying on him. They’ve taken away his legs, which is why he’s only scored 3 TDs last year and one of them was a 42 yarder.

And that was defensive coaching, too bad Dak didn't have the offensive coaching to counter that...
 

LACowboysFan1

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,048
Reaction score
7,177
Dak threw at a 50% rate two years running. How is that defensive coaching? Dak should be able to beat them with his arm...

You misread my post. What I said was when the other coaches did the spying on Dak, that was defensive coaching, which Dallas should have been able to counter. Yes two years running, you'd think Dallas could have figured out how to take away the spying, but not with Garrett running the show...
 
Top