TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 74,723
- Reaction score
- 69,369
If we miss Heath this year than Dix and Woods have failed us miserably.True. The guy is a mutant.
Yeah I suspect I will be missing Heath big time.
NOT!
If we miss Heath this year than Dix and Woods have failed us miserably.True. The guy is a mutant.
Yeah I suspect I will be missing Heath big time.
NOT!
Yeah I was going to say......I can't even really pinpoint their new "finds". I know they like both Griffin brothers but I mean are they having enough success there for them to just completely kill any shot of building a legit team around Russell?Yeah, Penny in the first is crazy. They always march to the beat of their own drum when it comes to evaluating draft prospects. It worked for them in the early part of the 2010’s thanks in large part to Russell Wilson and hitting on some late picks with Chancellor, Sherman, etc. However, there has been a steady talent drain in Seattle that they have been unable to stem because their drafting has been so bad since they won the super bowl.
They would have been better off if they had just drafted the BPA from NFL.com in the first round.
If we miss Heath this year than Dix and Woods have failed us miserably.
I would've gave a 1, 3 and Gallup. Not 2 firsts
When I think about what Mitch Tribusky and Darnold did to us.....I don't know if I'll ever get over it. I still remember the year when Wade got fired and David Garrard lit us up for like 4 touchdowns.....I just hope we get back to having a clue on what the hell we are on defense.... not just rolling 11 guys out there and saying "BEAT THE MAN IN FRONT OF YOU"...... When Sam Darnold highlight dunks on you then talks about how he did it in the post game interview you have a problem.
Yeah I'll be honest....I wouldn't have either. Like I said its not about the player its the position he plays that's a issue for me. I would've traded a 2nd and a 3rd....maybe next year 1st rounder but I would have traded it after I saw what the position was.I wouldn't trade Gallup straight up for a box SS.
No, I don’t think they’ve been really hitting late anymore.Yeah I was going to say......I can't even really pinpoint their new "finds". I know they like both Griffin brothers but I mean are they having enough success there for them to just completely kill any shot of building a legit team around Russell?
Lol ok manI wouldn't trade Gallup straight up for a box SS.
Yeah I'll be honest....I wouldn't have either. Like I said its not about the player its the position he plays that's a issue for me. I would've traded a 2nd and a 3rd....maybe next year 1st rounder but I would have traded it after I saw what the position was.
Lol, that's nearly the definition of throwing dollar bills into the fireplace to keep the place warm when you have furniture right there.Some franchises are actually all-in on winning championships, others are content just talking about it.
Anyways, here comes the "they paid too much" crowd.
If we miss Heath this year than Dix and Woods have failed us miserably.
I dunno man. Other than Cee who we have yet to see play in the league, but I think will be great, we haven’t been knocking it out of the park the past 4 years ourselves in the first and we had significantly lower picks than Seattle.For Seattle? I don't think the deal is that bad no. Only because they suck in the 1st round. But if the Cowboys do that? I would've been PISSED.
And also let me say this.....Seahawks could easily miss the playoffs this year. They are trading 1st rounders like they are the Patriots or someone. The NFC West will have 4 good teams this year. And if I'm being honest? I feel more comfortable with the Cardinals, 49ers and Rams then I do them. Jamal Adams on defense doesn't really swing things for me.
And throwing in a player that is one of their few decent draft picks recently, doesn’t help their talent level either.
Dak would get at least 3 1st if that’s the going rate for non QB’sDoes anyone think a team would give Dallas That type of ransom for Dak.?? Makes you wonder.