NASA Scientists Might Have Found a Parallel Universe 'Next to Ours' After an Antarctica Experiment

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,391
Reaction score
94,371
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
The Van Allen belt is no problem.And why would there be a crater under the lunar module ?
He thinks the retro rockets would have created one upon landing, as if the surface of the moon is five feet of dust or something.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,391
Reaction score
94,371
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Nasa never lies.

I've seen this before. It's garbage. Just look at the very first "example". It's be impossible to rotate sideways through the wires he's supposedly using.

I find it hilarious that so many of the people who believe this crap that YouTube conspiracy theorists are selling have the balls to call the rest of us "sheep".

Another thing: Just because it's possible to fake zero G with today's technology doesn't mean they actually do. They certainly didn't have this tech 50 years ago.

In a prior post, you cited "evidence" that the Russians could have been willing to allow the U.S. to get away with faking the moon landing because they wanted to have joint ventures in space missions. So why do you believe we're still not in space?
 
Last edited:

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,572
Reaction score
11,165
I've seen this before. It's garbage. Just look at the very first "example". It's be impossible to rotate sideways through the wires he's supposedly using.

I find it hilarious that so many of the people who believe this crap that YouTube conspiracy theorists are selling have the balls to call the rest of us "sheep".

Another thing: Just because it's possible to fake zero G with today's technology doesn't mean they actually do. They certainly didn't have this tech 50 years ago.

In a prior post, you cited "evidence" that the Russians could have been willing to allow the U.S. to get away with faking the moon landing because they wanted to have joint ventures in space missions. So why do you believe we're still not in space?

The 2nd one is better. The guy reaches to grab the guy flipping without even looking and snags his pocket with his pinkie. You can see his pinkie in the pocket. This is evidence of wires, I guess because if you were to attach wires to someone to fake zero gravity it would most definitely be on their pockets.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,295
Reaction score
44,015
The 2nd one is better. The guy reaches to grab the guy flipping without even looking and snags his pocket with his pinkie. You can see his pinkie in the pocket. This is evidence of wires, I guess because if you were to attach wires to someone to fake zero gravity it would most definitely be on their pockets.

Exactly.

And what of all the impromptu experiments that we’ve seen in these types of videos showing astronauts playing with floating water, chips, et cetera?

CGI, complex miniature wires on each individual Cheeto, lol?

What I see is a bunch of people floating in space (which is unnatural to humans) trying to conduct interviews in front of a camera standing still. Of course their movements are going to be strange.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,295
Reaction score
44,015

“In fact, there’s an extraordinary piece of evidence that disfavors them coming through the Earth: the IceCube neutrino detector exists, and if high-energy tau neutrinos are regularly passing through the Earth (and the Antarctic ice), IceCube would have definitively seen a signal. And, quite unambiguously, they have not.“

Call me skeptical, but I hardly doubt this rapper/actor can be counted on to see the signal.

043179-FF-87-E2-42-E2-BC24-A356-B53517-F8.jpg
 
Top