It means clever. Being able to accurately assess a situation. Just because you don't agree with what is or is not an astute observation does not change the meaning of the word.
The points he made were stupid.
"Our run blocking was bad, look at this one game". When our running blocking was easily top 10 from a variety of sources. Insisting on using a one game sample size instead of a 16 game sample, brilliant hust brilliant lmao.
Astute =/= stupid
And let's not pretend like the poster actually rewatched that game and specifically keyed in onto the run blocking, it was Zeke's lowest rushing output so he just figured "ehh I'll say the run blocking was bad".
"Again when Zeke rushes for X yards we have X-X record" again that's the most stupid argument used for running backs in the world. Teams with a 100 yard rusher win 95% of games. Why? BECAUSE YOU RUN WHEN YOURE AHEAD. The OP shows that when Zeke rushes early, it doesn't have any positive impact on us winning games. So thinking that attributing wins because he runs when we are....already winning...? It's such an elementary concept that has been disproven ad naseum.
Again astute =/= stupid
"Take Zeke off this team and we barely win six games". The team is 4-3 without Zeke since 2016. I mean this isn't difficult stuff dude. Hopefully I don't have to explain the math to you on this one.
@Cowboyny pretty much made the most stupid arguments he created in his head and put them on there praying that any of it was a correct and he completely struck out. It was an embarrassment of a post that you.... agreed with it.
So if you think his points were astute, I'm sorry Cern but that's not a good thing for ya bud.
If you want astute points, I just laid them out for you