I'm thinking about what either of those two could do with this offense, and I really think Brady would definitely put up more wins than Dak, and Rodgers probably would too. Not knocking Dak, these guys are, or at least were, the elite QBs in the past decade. How much they have left is hard to say, but I think either of them would do better with the offensive line and weapons we have than they did on their respective teams last year.
That's not how you rank them.
They will go out and produce based on what offenses they are in and what players are around them and that is how you rank them.
When Dak was saddled with Beasley as WR1 no one gave him any slack for being the 19th best QB in football.
Add Amari and he hops into top 10 in production and people still badly want to see him as mediocre.
That's just not accurate and hasn't been.
Brady struggled with accuracy and has lost athleticism and arm strength.
Dude is only a few years younger than me and mannn the body is just not the same.
Rodgers has been limited by injuries and attitude and weapons around him.
He may be the best natural QB of all-time but there's also a reason he fell in he draft.
People just generally hate the dude. His family, coaches, teammates are lukewarm at best on him.
And those are the ones still speaking to him.
If someone wants to artificially rank Rodgers and Brady high so be it, but complaining that someone took it seriously and ranked them where he expects them to fall this season isn't right.
