Understood but getting facts wrong discredit a post.
You should have quit while you were ahead after correction which disputed your post.
I hear ya. But there are still some objective fans left who can see the good and bad qualities in a players talent and abilities. Which both Dak and Romo have or had.Not according to the some. If you don’t bash Dak it’s because you’re trying to make Romo look bad but if you do bash Dak it’s because you’re still trying to make Romo look better than he was.
It’s impossible to criticize both, it just can’t happen, completely illogical
To me they are in the same boat. If you disliked one you should probably dislike the other and vice versa.Not according to the some. If you don’t bash Dak it’s because you’re trying to make Romo look bad but if you do bash Dak it’s because you’re still trying to make Romo look better than he was.
It’s impossible to criticize both, it just can’t happen, completely illogical
you left out the major difference. romo suffered from the glitch. dak is just limited to what he is. but he's not otherwise glitch affected.
never Daks fault we get it.........
I agree with your sentiment, but I'm not that high on Goff either. The league figured that dude out, too.
it wasn't just a lousy throw. it was a lousy decision. Pollard was open in the flat and would have had a one on one to get the first down..at worst its third and 1 and they can run the ball.
https://ibb.co/Rvtpm65
![a>](http://<a href="https://ibb.co/Rvtpm65"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/r7qGSpW/Screen-Shot-2020-09-17-at-8-22-27-AM.png" alt="Screen-Shot-2020-09-17-at-8-22-27-AM" border="0" /></a>)
I guess it's not a problem if he makes a good throw but it was a terrible throw.
he had lamb on a crosser earlier on a 3rd and 3 and chose to run with the ball and dive and get a first down. if he just throws it to lamb he has a ton of space to run. Its not like he didn't see him?
The thing is just because you don't say outright if he's acceptable doesn't mean you didn't say so without saying so. If something is whatever you'd just say so and if you have any hesitation you think they're average or worse. That's the unscientific rules sorry. 5 years in isn't the process of determining anymore. Save that madness for someone else. If you don't in 5 years what it is with just about anything the answer is it isn't whatever you think you're looking for.
When is the last time Dak threw 3 picks with a 24 point lead. Ill wait.
I would rather have Goff. I’ve said it before.
When was the last time Romo failed to score more than 17 points 4 times in 7 games?
He’s certainly doing more with his supporting cast than the Dakster. Id argue Goff is elevating those around him. And I’d bet he’d have a field day with our talent.
Stop moving goalposts
