Video: There are no excuses left for Dak’s mediocrity

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
When was the last time Romo failed to score more than 17 points 4 times in 7 games?
I love how you guys always move the goalposts. Dak isnt the only one on the field. Romo had help in those touchdowns. As Dak has in his. I asked a simple question. When has Dak thrown 3 picks with s 24 point lead.

You couldnt answer it so you come at me with a stat Dak hasnt acheived. Dak isnt romo. Romo was a way better passer. He was also much more likely to cause us to lose a game to win with his gunslinging ways. Until 2014 at least. You guys defend Romo like hes your family member.

Romo never failed to score 17 points. Not that i know of at least. Now I want an answer from you. When has dak thrown 3 picks with a 24 point lead to lose the game?
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
Stop moving goalposts


The topic is Dak’s play and record against winning teams. He doesnt play well. YOU brought up Romo. I simply showed you that Romo played well in these same type of games.

Now since you want to move goalposts, when did Romo go 10 straight quarters without leading a TD drive?
What is Romo's record against Winning teams? Ill tell you. 18-24. Since you want to make winning a QB stat.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
35,541
Reaction score
12,825
I love how you guys always move the goalposts. Dak isnt the only one on the field. Romo had help in those touchdowns. As Dak has in his. I asked a simple question. When has Dak thrown 3 picks with s 24 point lead.

You couldnt answer it so you come at me with a stat Dak hasnt acheived. Dak isnt romo. Romo was a way better passer. He was also much more likely to cause us to lose a game to win with his gunslinging ways. Until 2014 at least. You guys defend Romo like hes your family member.

Romo never failed to score 17 points. Not that i know of at least. Now I want an answer from you. When has dak thrown 3 picks with a 24 point lead to lose the game?

lol...hello, pot!
 

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
5,208
Romo was an elite quarterback in a trainwreck franchise who could put the team on his back and win games on many occasions. Dak is entirely dependent on being surrounded by elite talent, and if one or two pieces are missing, he's awful. He needs near perfection around him to be successful.

Romo's arm talent and accuracy don't reside in Dak, and his ability to read coverages pre-snap and during the play were exceptional. Dak doesn't seem to be progressing in that regard whatsoever. Romo made receivers like Austin, Robinson, Hurd, and Beasley effective beyond their actual talent. Dak holds receivers back from their potential.

The difference between the two is night and day. Even before the PI call, Dak was 1 for 7 on 3rd downs for 11 yards. A healthy Romo wins that game Sunday night going away.

Is a “healthy Romo” the same guy who threw 3 picks in the second half and pissed away a 27-3 lead against the Lions in 2011?

Romo and his “arm talent” blew countless games that Dak would be crucified for if he did the same.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
35,541
Reaction score
12,825
Is a “healthy Romo” the same guy who threw 3 picks in the second half and pissed away a 27-3 lead against the Lions in 2011?

Romo and his “arm talent” blew countless games that Dak would be crucified for if he did the same.

He already has...
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,772
Reaction score
58,272
I love how you guys always move the goalposts. Dak isnt the only one on the field. Romo had help in those touchdowns. As Dak has in his. I asked a simple question. When has Dak thrown 3 picks with s 24 point lead.

You couldnt answer it so you come at me with a stat Dak hasnt acheived. Dak isnt romo. Romo was a way better passer. He was also much more likely to cause us to lose a game to win with his gunslinging ways. Until 2014 at least. You guys defend Romo like hes your family member.

Romo never failed to score 17 points. Not that i know of at least. Now I want an answer from you. When has dak thrown 3 picks with a 24 point lead to lose the game?
If Romo played those 7 games, I would bet a big sum that he would have won at least 3 of the games against the Eagles, Bears, Bills, and Rams with the exact same personnel and coaching.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,772
Reaction score
58,272
Is a “healthy Romo” the same guy who threw 3 picks in the second half and pissed away a 27-3 lead against the Lions in 2011?

Romo and his “arm talent” blew countless games that Dak would be crucified for if he did the same.

Dak wouldn't have blown those games because he wouldn't have been in those games.

Remember the shootout against Peyton Manning? Dak couldn't put up a performance like that in a game like that with a thousand tries.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
If Romo played those 7 games, I would bet a big sum that he would have won at least 3 of the games against the Eagles, Bears, Bills, and Rams with the exact same personnel and coaching.
No he wouldnt have. He would have been on IR before then. Especially after the Jets game. Romo would have been out for the year after that beating. The guys body quit on him. The fact you guys refuse to admit that is mind boggling.
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
And his performance are better in those games as opposed to Dak’s.

Romo> Dak


Case Closed
Wasnt arguing who was better. But their win loss is pretty close against winning teams. So if W/L is a QB stat. I dont care what they did in the game. The W/L is all that matters. Unless you want to go on record saying that W/L isnt a qb stat.

Also. last point. Did Romo take this team on an 11 game winning streak? Ever? Just curious
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,564
Reaction score
34,419
Dak stans always look foolish claiming Dak is better then Romo, then they play the injury card, that Romo wouldn’t last, while this team starts guys like Sean Lee and LVE. It’s comical...

“But Dak has the ‘it’ factor”..

This young team believed their own hype in year 1 and chose their ‘boy’ over the clearly superior QB. Talk about lack of football intelligence...
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,564
Reaction score
34,419
Even when Romo came back against the Eagles, in which Dak was laying an egg, one after another, the Eagles defense dropped back in coverage, completely respecting Romo’s arm, and this was without Zeke.

And Romo was throwing lasers that Dak could only dream of, despite ‘his back’.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
24,534
Reaction score
29,886
3 things
1) even if the PI went our way , Dak just didn’t play good enough, and could Have well ended up losing the Game .
2) even if we had won the rams game , Dak’s shortcomings will come back in a game soon . Maybe a more crucial game as we saw last year .
3) romo is superior to Dak in many many aspects and has actually made significant comebacks for rhe cowboys . Dak’s talent level is no anywhere near Romo.

What ocurred in that game had absolutely nothing to do with Romo. You just exposed yourself as having an agenda to glorify Romo.

Sorry, but that's weak basis for criticism of what Dak did in that game.

Romo made his share of mistakes throughout his career.

Dak is surely entitled to the same consideration.
 
Last edited:

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
5,208
Dak wouldn't have blown those games because he wouldn't have been in those games.

Remember the shootout against Peyton Manning? Dak couldn't put up a performance like that in a game like that with a thousand tries.

Dak as a rookie went toe-to-toe with Aaron Rodgers in the playoffs and frankly, looked better than Romo ever did in a playoff game.

That's the problem with those "put a healthy Romo in that game..." arguments. We had a healthy Romo for a long time. We saw the results. He had some great games, and he had some really bad games. For every 5 TD shootout with Peyton, there's a horrific blunder like the Lions game. You don't get to give him credit for the great ones, and then absolve him of blame and put the bad ones on the "trainwreck" of a franchise.
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
15,150
Reaction score
43,563
Wasnt arguing who was better. But their win loss is pretty close against winning teams. So if W/L is a QB stat. I dont care what they did in the game. The W/L is all that matters. Unless you want to go on record saying that W/L isnt a qb stat.

Also. last point. Did Romo take this team on an 11 game winning streak? Ever? Just curious
The point of the Dak vs winning teams debate is to showcase that not only does he not beat these teams, but he does not perform well either.

Dak stans always want to bring up stats and his W/L record but hate when his W/L record vs winning teams are brought up.

Their new go-to is other QBs, but failing to provide context. Complete deflection.

If Dak goes 30/30, throws for 400 yds and 5 Tds, and the Cowboys lose, then no one can blame him, but thats not what happens. Hes not leading 4QCs, and is barely putting up points on the board.
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,586
Reaction score
4,966
And his performance are better in those games as opposed to Dak’s.

Romo> Dak


Case Closed
I don't know why this is even a question if we are just talking about who is a better quarterback. What does Dak do better as a QB than Romo that isn't some Tebow esque non sense? Maybe he has a stronger arm but that's about it. I'm not sure about that but I'd be willing to give that to him.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
37,772
Reaction score
58,272
Dak as a rookie went toe-to-toe with Aaron Rodgers in the playoffs and frankly, looked better than Romo ever did in a playoff game.

That's the problem with those "put a healthy Romo in that game..." arguments. We had a healthy Romo for a long time. We saw the results. He had some great games, and he had some really bad games. For every 5 TD shootout with Peyton, there's a horrific blunder like the Lions game. You don't get to give him credit for the great ones, and then absolve him of blame and put the bad ones on the "trainwreck" of a franchise.
You mean against a defense that have up 31 points by halftime the following week? Lol

Learn some football.
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
7,396
Well, he's 2-5 in his last 7 games and failed to score more than 17 points in 4 of those games. So......
So....we all know QBs are judged on the last 7 games they've played especially Game 1 in a season after signing an Exclusive Franchise Tag Tender...:lmao2::facepalm:


Go sell your crazy logic to lesser minded people
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,651
Reaction score
7,396
No, the throw was absolute garbage...
A throw away from the primary defender into space for YAC or WR protection for a 1st Down

Yep Dak Haters are what Dave Chappelle would call "Not Part of the Solution"
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
The point of the Dak vs winning teams debate is to showcase that not only does he not beat these teams, but he does not perform well either.

Dak stans always want to bring up stats and his W/L record but hate when his W/L record vs winning teams are brought up.

Their new go-to is other QBs, but failing to provide context. Complete deflection.

If Dak goes 30/30, throws for 400 yds and 5 Tds, and the Cowboys lose, then no one can blame him, but thats not what happens. Hes not leading 4QCs, and is barely putting up points on the board.

Because then you can look at Romo's record against winning teams and see he didnt fair well either? I get what you're saying though and the bet is still on my friend.
 
Top