Since Zuerlein's onside kick can only work once

sunalsorises

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,903
Reaction score
4,623
Hopefully once is all they need it. That was a brilliant kick and I could see it working again once people forget about it or if someone muffs “just jumping on it.”
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,559
Reaction score
42,360
Zuerlein pulled off the trick perfectly, but it's only going to work once. From this point on, all Cowboys opponents are going to pounce on that ball before it goes 10 yards. They aren't going to stand and watch like the Falcons did.

So does he have to go back to performing normal traditional onside kicks from this point on?

Just means he'll have to be more creative next time? Maybe try what Pat McAfee used to do.
 

Reverend Conehead

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,938
Reaction score
11,821
Zuerlein pulled off the trick perfectly, but it's only going to work once. From this point on, all Cowboys opponents are going to pounce on that ball before it goes 10 yards. They aren't going to stand and watch like the Falcons did.

So does he have to go back to performing normal traditional onside kicks from this point on?

He could use one of those ones with an unpredictable bounce and hope one of our players has better luck and/or better concentration than the opponents.
 

Jipper

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,007
Reaction score
21,574
Duh, but this answer is meaningless. Of course every team that has to do an onside kick wishes they didn't have to do one. If it were as simple as "We'll kick the #$#($*(* out of the other team," the Cowboys would go 16-0 every year.

You can't go 16-0 just because you want to.

so the answer to the "meaningless" answer is what? i was clearly having a little bit of fun...stop taking yourself so seriously.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,391
Reaction score
94,371
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Zuerlein pulled off the trick perfectly, but it's only going to work once. From this point on, all Cowboys opponents are going to pounce on that ball before it goes 10 yards. They aren't going to stand and watch like the Falcons did.

So does he have to go back to performing normal traditional onside kicks from this point on?
It will probably never work the same way, but it could possibly work by virtue of being a difficult ball to handle. Once the receiving team touches it, it's a live ball, and if they muff it, our guys could get it.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,002
Reaction score
29,877
It was the way the ball was spinning. I think they were afraid if they touched it they couldn’t handle it with out the ball sliding out of there hands..
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,391
Reaction score
94,371
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Sounds like they had a plan on if they had pounced on it to try to blow up the pouncer to knock the ball loose. I think we will see it again in the future. Hopefully it is not needed in the near future.
Amen!
 

ActualCowboysFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,415
Reaction score
9,493
its possible that Atlanta wasn't just stupid, but didn't anticipate the ball going 10 yards, and therefore didn't want to risk jumping on it while its spinning around and end up losing it creating a live ball.

If Zuerlein can get enough spin on that ball who knows, maybe it works again? All I know for sure is that was a hell of an onside kick play.
Probable. If teams adjust to put their hand guys in front then you basically try to hit and fight for the ball under the pile. I think it was an ingenious play because it stressed quick decision making. You could see Hurst figure it out too right before it crossed. I think it might be a new wrinkle for the play. Special teams is fun as heck to coach because you get to try creative solutions like this and we have one of the best at it.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
I say kick it hard and see if you can get it to bounce off someone...
I actually like this idea lol. I wonder if anyone's ever tried it. Might work best for a kicker with a monster leg. Just line-drive it directly into the chest of one of the receivers as hard as you can.
 

Red Dragon

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,395
Reaction score
3,773
I actually like this idea lol. I wonder if anyone's ever tried it. Might work best for a kicker with a monster leg. Just line-drive it directly into the chest of one of the receivers as hard as you can.
Problem is, if you miss, that ball either goes out bounds untouched, or deep into opposing territory where they snag it easily.
 

Maxmadden

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,143
Reaction score
4,369
It was a perfect kick, but I suspect that was not exactly what he was trying to do.
 

Established1971

fiveandcounting
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
4,125
its possible that Atlanta wasn't just stupid, but didn't anticipate the ball going 10 yards, and therefore didn't want to risk jumping on it while its spinning around and end up losing it creating a live ball.

If Zuerlein can get enough spin on that ball who knows, maybe it works again? All I know for sure is that was a hell of an onside kick play.
so whats the rule, the receiving team can take possession of the ball before 10 yards, the kicking team must wait for it to go at least 10 yards. However if the receiving team attempts to take possession before 10 and fails to and touches it, then its live and the receiving team could conceivably get it before 10?
Is that how it works?
If so then I now get why Atl did what they did
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Established1971

fiveandcounting
Messages
5,528
Reaction score
4,125
Wasnt it a Cowboy kicker way back whenever who went up to the kick and swung his trailing leg over and kicked with that at the last second? Like some kind of behind the back pass in basketball? I may not be describing it right but I have this vague image in my head of some trickerino move
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
Problem is, if you miss, that ball either goes out bounds untouched, or deep into opposing territory where they snag it easily.
True, but if it gets drilled far back downfield then it would just be like a regular kickoff. And the out of bounds thing.... you're right, but then again I guess every approach to the onside kick has its flaws.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
Wasnt it a Cowboy kicker way back whenever who went up to the kick and swung his trailing leg over and kicked with that at the last second? Like some kind of behind the back pass in basketball? I may not be describing it right but I have this vague image in my head of some trickerino move
I know what you're getting at, and I vaguely remember something like this too. Don't know if it was the Cowboys or not though.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,352
Reaction score
96,011
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
its possible that Atlanta wasn't just stupid, but didn't anticipate the ball going 10 yards, and therefore didn't want to risk jumping on it while its spinning around and end up losing it creating a live ball.

If Zuerlein can get enough spin on that ball who knows, maybe it works again? All I know for sure is that was a hell of an onside kick play.

After 5 yards that was my thought, crap it won't go 10 years, it will stop moving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,352
Reaction score
96,011
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
If they need to do another on side kick, most likely it could be a pooch type kick. A blooper in the air, let a player run under it to catch it. But it has to be a surprise kick.
 
Top