What would we have lost by with Dak?

gimmesix · Oct 19, 2020

I'm just curious (and wonder if anyone thinks we would have won).

I believe it would have been 38-17. Dak is worth a couple of touchdowns, but he probably would have at least thrown one of the interceptions Dalton did (the one where Kirkpatrick mugged Lamb), he couldn't have done anything to prevent Elliott's fumbles and our OL wouldn't have handled Arizona's pressure any better, although Dak might have escaped some of it.

Aven8 · Oct 19, 2020

We’re in that game with Dak, no doubt. The D had lots of stops early. Zeke needed to be benched. His heads not in it right now.

CowboysDrew · Oct 19, 2020

105-0 by some thought here.

JayFord · Oct 19, 2020

We Still lose with Dak but that offense puts up 34

MysteryIceGuro · Oct 19, 2020

I think it would’ve been closer to 38-28. Dak’s deep throws are way better. Zeke’s fumbles definitely hurt, but I don’t think Dak would’ve thrown an interception in “garbage time” unless it was a hail Mary attempt. Either way, the score would’ve been way higher.

Aviano90 · Oct 19, 2020

Defense was hung out to dry all game by the offense. We win that game tonight with Dak. Defense was playing well enough early that Dak gets us a lead and we play from ahead.

Jake · Oct 19, 2020

gimmesix said:
I'm just curious (and wonder if anyone thinks we would have won).

I believe it would have been 38-17. Dak is worth a couple of touchdowns, but he probably would have at least thrown one of the interceptions Dalton did (the one where Kirkpatrick mugged Lamb), he couldn't have done anything to prevent Elliott's fumbles and our OL wouldn't have handled Arizona's pressure any better, although Dak might have escaped some of it.

The Cowboys averaged over 32 ppg with Dak, but don't let that get in the way of the Dalton excuses. I understand some folks need a reason to believe, even if it's false.

thunderpimp91 · Oct 19, 2020

Its a closer game but we still lose. Too much about the qb position, that just distracts from the real issues with this team.

gimmesix · Oct 19, 2020

AmariChill said:
I think it would’ve been closer to 38-28. Dak’s deep throws are way better. Zeke’s fumbles definitely hurt, but I don’t think Dak would’ve thrown an interception in “garbage time” unless it was a hail Mary attempt. Either way, the score would’ve been way higher.

Possibly for Arizona, too. They let off the gas some, but they did score even while trying to take the air out of the ball.

CATCH17 · Oct 19, 2020

Aven8 said:
We’re in that game with Dak, no doubt. The D had lots of stops early. Zeke needed to be benched. His heads not in it right now.

I don’t know how unless you think he gets us back in it late because early on Zeke and Gallup sabotaged the team.

gimmesix · Oct 19, 2020

Jake said:
The Cowboys averaged over 32 ppg with Dak, but don't let that get in the way of the Dalton excuses. I understand some folks need a reason to believe, even if it's false.

We scored 17 against LA. Just because we were averaging 32 doesn't mean we hit that mark every game. Arizona's defense played pretty well, so I don't think we would have hit that average.

Gridiron Man · Oct 19, 2020

We can afford to lean heavily on Dak, he has shown that. But it shouldn't be that way. Our defense is to blame for having to put it all on one player.

Now we are putting it all on the shoulders of Zek. It shouldn't be that way. Dalton can't carry this team, he has shown that.

No one player should have to carry this team. Win as a team, lose as a team.

CowboyRoy · Oct 19, 2020

gimmesix said:
I'm just curious (and wonder if anyone thinks we would have won).

I believe it would have been 38-17. Dak is worth a couple of touchdowns, but he probably would have at least thrown one of the interceptions Dalton did (the one where Kirkpatrick mugged Lamb), he couldn't have done anything to prevent Elliott's fumbles and our OL wouldn't have handled Arizona's pressure any better, although Dak might have escaped some of it.

Team averaged 37 points a game under Dak. And that was with bad Oline play.

Simple math says that is 27 points better than Dalton.

bsbellomy · Oct 19, 2020

Jake said:
The Cowboys averaged over 32 ppg with Dak, but don't let that get in the way of the Dalton excuses. I understand some folks need a reason to believe, even if it's false.

Well you have to factor in that we played most of the game without Zack Martin, and that defense would have probably been the best we have faced.

catiii · Oct 19, 2020

thunderpimp91 said:
Its a closer game but we still lose. Too much about the qb position, that just distracts from the real issues with this team.

Real issue with this team was being served by a private bartender up in the owner's suite.

CowboysFaninHouston · Oct 19, 2020

gimmesix said:
I'm just curious (and wonder if anyone thinks we would have won).

I believe it would have been 38-17. Dak is worth a couple of touchdowns, but he probably would have at least thrown one of the interceptions Dalton did (the one where Kirkpatrick mugged Lamb), he couldn't have done anything to prevent Elliott's fumbles and our OL wouldn't have handled Arizona's pressure any better, although Dak might have escaped some of it.

probably would have come down to the last drive....so don't even try.....

cowboyec · Oct 19, 2020

i think we win.
the early turn overs did 14 no favors.

bsbellomy · Oct 19, 2020

CowboyRoy said:
Dak wins this game for sure. We now have evidence. Dak is around 30 points better than Dalton so far. They averaged 37 per week under Dak this year. But somehow you get they would have 17? LOL

Another Dak troll obviously.

We dont win that game with Dak. Im not saying that as an indictment on Dak but you got the feeling AZ could have scored a lot more if they didnt take their foot off the gas. We probably dont have another 3 wins in our schedule.

gimmesix · Oct 19, 2020

CowboysFaninHouston said:
probably would have come down to the last drive....so don't even try.....

Don't even try what. I'm not trying to disparage Dak. I'm just asking a question.

I think Arizona's defense played well against our backups offensive line, so I don't think this would have been a real high-scoring game for us. Saying Dak is two touchdowns better than Dalton in this one should be seen as a compliment.

Aven8 · Oct 19, 2020

CATCH17 said:
I don’t know how unless you think he gets us back in it late because early on Zeke and Gallup sabotaged the team.

Well for one he’s going to try and throw past 4 yards.

I get your grievances about Dak’s salary, but you should be pointing at #21. He’s the overpaid bum that’s killing this team. Every run he makes he’s leaning so far forward he falls down. He’s lost it. He was my favorite player too, but no more. I have NO idea what’s up with him. Weed? A girl? No clue.....

What would we have lost by with Dak?

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Go Seahawks!!!

Beyond tired of Jerry

Well-Known Member

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

1st Round Pick

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

"I AM GRIDIRON MAN"

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

CowboysFaninDC

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Well-Known Member