As an engineer, show me the data to back up what one is trying to say. Sure. I looked at the data he provided. I am a data-driven person. No matter what side one is on, that is some good data. Yes, no data is perfect but this helps to put things in perspective concerning Dak and Dalton.
I said early on, or even before the season began, that this season would give us good data on the team and the individual players. I think we learned a lot and can make some decisions going forward. What did we learn? We learned that Dak is not worth a large guaranteed contract. Even more so with the injury now. The team can win with a QB like Dalton as well as a team with Dak. Dak was 1-3 with a gift-wrapped win thanks to Atlanta. So, basically Dak was 0-4 to begin the year. Pitiful for a QB making $30M. We need to use the saved money on defense. We learned that neither Dak or Zeke are capable of carrying the team. The offensive cupboard is loaded and we do not need a star QB to succeed. We can move on from Tyron Smith and Collins and slide Zach Martin to OT. We learned that Awuzie and Lewis are so-so CBs. I would not get into a bidding war for either. We learned that LVE is fragile like Lee and can't be relied on. We learned that Jaylon Smith is pedestrian. We learned that we need a complete LB makeover. We got no improvement at safety unfortunately.
Sunday's game will tell us a lot more about Dak vs Dalton. We shall see with a playoff spot on the line how Dalton will perform.
I happen to be an engineer too, so as a fellow engineer you should understand and know better than eliminate data and not consider all input. instead you only used data to make your results workout to your liking....that's a big NO NO for engineers. that's the very first thing they teach you in any engineering school.
What did we learn? that Dalton is not capable of beating any starting QB, which he failed to do but once (statistically called outlier and often eliminated to get to the norm). We learned that in order to beat bad teams he needs a lot of help. I mean a lot of help from the Defense, getting him turnovers and even scoring and favorable field position as his ou put having to start in our end of the field has been absolutely dismal. We learned he is not capable of beating average teams...those are the inputs you as an engineer failed to take into account. if you would have worked on the shuttle as an engineer, it would explode on the platform...
Looking at all the data....We learned that Dak can keep the team competitive, when the defense is dismal (facts and data available to you as an engineer, then use them). we learned when the defense is giving up 200, 300, 200 yards rushing.....giving up TD passes after TD passes, giving up 36 points per game, that he can still bring the team to within one score with few minutes to go...those are data and information that's right in front of you and you chose to ignore....we also learned when the defense gives up 200 yards rushing, with Dalton the team is not competitive at all (Ravens). same data points, different results.
and I find it funny, you mention the Atlanta game and call it gift wrap, yet ignore the 9 turnovers, and the defensive performance over the pat three weeks and not call those gift wrapped.. Dalton had a horrible outing against Cinci, if not for defense scoring and keep getting him the ball at their end of the field and stopping them from a sure score with another fumble recovery on our end. DATA. INFORMATION and all relevant information must be taken into account....I expect more from you as an engineer.
and we learned if not for defense gift wrapping games for Dalton as well as the opposing team having their back up QBs then we would be 1-7 with him (AZ, WFT, Ravens)
we learned that Dalton is not the answer based on the evidence and data available to us as engineers. clear and concise data.
perhaps, as an engineer you would know (again basic engineering principles), that when you come to conclusion you outline all your assumptions and conditions, other wise you end up with the shuttle falling apart before getting to the platform....basic engineering principles that they teach in ALL engineering schools....and the conditions you failed to recognize as required for wins with Dalton is that we can win with Dalton
if every team we play is a top 10 picking team, with their back up QBs, needing defensive turnovers to get to victory....so if those conditions are true next year, then we have a chance.....because once those conditions weren't true, this team wasn't competitive and got blown out (Ravens, AZ, WFT(2)).
I am disappointed in you as an engineer. you failed. I wouldn't want you on my engineering team.