News: Cowboys Rumored as Top Landing Spot for Former Pro Bowl QB Mitch Trubisky

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,527
Reaction score
21,606
Well, you are rambling. I mean, I guess if that's what you want to do, whatever, but I'm not gonna waste time engaging in this nonsense.

I'd say that it's your story so you should tell it but this story is so ridiculously idiotic that I can not advocate the retelling of it at all.

You are wasting my time.

Seems like to me you're doing fine with that for yourself.
 

viman96

Thread Killer
Messages
21,387
Reaction score
22,323
Hack article to say it is a "rumor". This is just based on another sites opinion.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,739
Reaction score
22,634
Lol @ the same people who claimed Dalton would be as good, if not better than Dak, are now the ones claiming Trubisky will do the same. Rinse and repeat, same results.
Then pull the rabbit out of your hat.
You play the market with what the market has available.
What is your better prospect?
 

Captain-Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,424
Reaction score
33,684
just bring cooper rush back, he didn't scare the dak worshiper. They get scared if any quarterback has any kind of talent to take his job. sheesh. dak lovers or cowboys hater, you make the call.
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
I never said he wouldn’t be a “decent” back up, did I?

What I did say is that I was laughing at a lot of the same people who said Dalton would come in and be just as good, if not better than Dak, are now saying the same thing about Mitch. Once Mitch doesn’t meet those claims, those same people will find another back up caliber QB and say the same thing, it will never end because they hate Dak.
 

Starforever

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,548
Reaction score
5,079
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Are you disputing my view that Trubisky is not a starting quality QB?


As I said on another thread, Dak= Trubisky.

Dont see any reason to have either on the roster unless they are cheap backups.

P.S. does the Bears version of CZ have loads of Trubisky fans wanting him signed for 40m?


This is what you stated. How are they the same? Has not Dak proven himself on the football field? I want Dak to receive as much as he can get; it does not hurt my bank account one bit. And no one, is rooting for Dak to get $40 million. He has not stated that amount himself. First you say that neither QB should not be on the roster; then you call Trubisky a starting quality QB. What is your angle? Not disputing your view, just want to know are you for or against.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,739
Reaction score
22,634
I never said he wouldn’t be a “decent” back up, did I?

What I did say is that I was laughing at a lot of the same people who said Dalton would come in and be just as good, if not better than Dak, are now saying the same thing about Mitch. Once Mitch doesn’t meet those claims, those same people will find another back up caliber QB and say the same thing, it will never end because they hate Dak.
I never said that you said that they said...lol etc...
All I said, or intended to say was that Mitch would be a great QB2. ,, But with starters retiring like Brees and Rivers, definitely ups the anty on MT.
There are only a few, handful of true franchise QBs in this league, then the tier drops. Dak is no doubt a starter in this league, and without a doubt better than MT.
But MT might find a team that is willing to try and put him in a starting role, he will be seeking that.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,739
Reaction score
22,634
As I said on another thread, Dak= Trubisky.

Dont see any reason to have either on the roster unless they are cheap backups.

P.S. does the Bears version of CZ have loads of Trubisky fans wanting him signed for 40m?


This is what you stated. How are they the same? Has not Dak proven himself on the football field? I want Dak to receive as much as he can get; it does not hurt my bank account one bit. And no one, is rooting for Dak to get $40 million. He has not stated that amount himself. First you say that neither QB should not be on the roster; then you call Trubisky a starting quality QB. What is your angle? Not disputing your view, just want to know are you for or against.
Ive been rough on Dak, but saying that Trub is in the same conversation with Dak is a bit overstating.
Dak does not equal Trubisky.
Trub would be a great understudy if the FO was really short on the leash with Dak in their opinion on him, but I doubt that happens, and I doubt Dallas is even in considerations for MT.
All Im saying is that I wouldnt mind having Dak the starter, and Trub the BU... pipe dream, but my thoughts none the less.
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
I never said that you said that they said...lol etc...
All I said, or intended to say was that Mitch would be a great QB2. ,, But with starters retiring like Brees and Rivers, definitely ups the anty on MT.
There are only a few, handful of true franchise QBs in this league, then the tier drops. Dak is no doubt a starter in this league, and without a doubt better than MT.
But MT might find a team that is willing to try and put him in a starting role, he will be seeking that.
Gotchya, I guess I misinterpreted. Sure, I’d take him as a back up and I agree with everything else you said :)
 
Top