One of the positive things about Dak

FuzzyLumpkins said:

You can write multiple sentences of excuse and obfuscation but not a single sentence to back up what you claim because you don't care? If it walks like a conman, writes like a conman. . . . .

And you were commenting on Dak. If you don't like the responses then don't reply.

Click to expand...

FuzzyLumpkins said:

You act with surety with nothing back it up. That is exactly what conmen do.

Confidence is synonymous with assured. You are saying that you are sure about something and that people should just take you on faith.

What I am doing is not subtle. I am directly saying that you are behaving like a conman with specific reasons.

And spare me equating your assertions about a quarterbacks ability with any science or logical structure.

Click to expand...

TwentyOne said:

You posted a ESPN twitter post that only shows their opinion. And maybe not even that.
Because twitter posts are not really the way to post facts or start talking about facts. For that they are way to short and really not meant for it.
It feels a little strange to me that you really use a twitter post to prove something. And i really start to having my doubts about your ability to gather and interpret information the right way.

But then:
Where are the facts you were talking about ?
Show me some posts from other teams GMs for instance that say for them he is a highly sought after player. That would be a good start.

And btw, who says that average QBs dont have the luxury ? Do you have any kind of prove of that ?
I give you just two examples to show that it may not be the way you think:
I remember when Kirk Cousin hit the open market - an QB most people think he is average - he was very well a sought after player.
Also when the Eagles backup QB won the SB (also a commonly accepted average player), he was very sought after the next offseason.

But you want to state something else. What you are trying to say is:

Sought after QB = good or great QB.
Not sought after QB = average or bad QB.

Thats a great scientic finding and it could revolutionize the scouting departement. In fact no team would scouts anymore!

Are you really serious about the crap that you are posting here ?

Click to expand...

Big D said:

We caught lightning in a bottle twice. First with Romo and now Dak. How long can the luck last?

Click to expand...

TwentyOne said:

Did you learned another word in school ? conman seems to be your favorite one right now.

Click to expand...

TwentyOne said:

I did not say i dont like the responses. I would say i dont like ones like yours that have essentially no value.

Click to expand...

Sydla said:

is that he appears to be willing to listen and take advice from all sources. And when he screws up he seems willing to take it. Contrast that to Wentz. Jeff McLane is a plugged in beat writer for them and has a story that paints Wentz as a prima donna and pain the butt.

I linked to the summary from Bleeding Green Nation but the main article linked in the story is from the Philly Inquirer and you may need a subscription to read.

https://www.bleedinggreennation.com...hable-insubordinate-nfl-doug-pederson-news-qb

Click to expand...

FuzzyLumpkins said:

So saying that Dak is demonstrably accurate, performs under pressure, efficient, productive, protects the ball, reads defenses, and other factors that go into judging QB play has no value.

OToh, you saying that Dak is poor because you are confident about it is valid.

Your disinformation is a blight.

Click to expand...

FuzzyLumpkins said:

You don't even argue my observations but instead appeal to ridicule.

Click to expand...