Let's assume Dak gets what he wants

conner01 said:

I don’t agree at all
One thing you have to have to win a SB is a QB
And half the league needs one right now
When you are blessed enough to get one you keep him
And I don’t believe he’s ever ask for 40 mil

Click to expand...

So you agree if he does ask for that you would dump him, ok.

CowboysFaninHouston said:

what stands out to me, based on those stats we should have won more games, but bad coaching, bad in game decisions contributed to many losses, this is not a Dak excuse or debate, but that coaching has probably a great impact on final results. in 2019, we lost games in NO, Minn, Patriots where bad coaching decisions pulled losses from jaws of victory.....garrett was never known for his in game decision making. again, not making excuses, but man, I was screaming at the screen against minnesotta when we couldn't rush the ball, were passing at will and they decided to run the ball when they got close to the end zone and then two stupid stupid stupid pass plays to Zeke....I mean I almost threw my shoe at the screen before my wife stopped me

Click to expand...

Garrett lost a LOT of games with his in game decision making. Remember his icing Dan Bailey at Baltimore? I was at the Minnesota game in 2019 and if I could have gotten my hands around his neck (or Moore's) in that game I would have strangled him. Dak was on fire late in that game (when he was running no huddle) and we called timeout when we got close .. and promptly bogged down with the two runs up the middle followed by the two low percentage throws to Zeke with the game on the line. Minny had been stuffing the run game all day but for some reason these idiots went back to running up the middle late in the game. Likewise in the Philly game after not practicing all week we chose to let Dak start the game?!?! What the hell man!!!?!?!!? The correct play would have been to let Rush start and bring Dak off the bench if things got out of hand. That way you get the benefit of the "Dak to the rescue" emotional lift. If you start him and the other team figures out he's compromised, you're screwed.

Jarv said:

So you agree if he does ask for that you would dump him, ok.

Click to expand...

He hasn’t ask for 40 mil
So

conner01 said:

He hasn’t ask for 40 mil
So

Click to expand...

You and I don't know that.

Would you go that high if he does ask for that?

A question for those Dak lovers, do you know if there is a reliable source, where it is said that another team's interest in Dak has been shown? since many here say that Dak is better than Stafford, seeing when he was given by Stafford (2 first rounds a 3rd round and apart a QB number one overall selection) besides several teams were interested in him also offering a lot for him; if Dak is supposedly better than Stafford, why hasn't he piqued Stafford's interest?

USArmyVet said:

All this one does is post inconsequential videos.....sad existence.

Click to expand...

I see the salt is burning your hating wounds!

I’d rather see the don’t pay crowd cry over this situation but almost as big a part of me wants to see this team wander a qbless desert as well.

I want to see them pay him and watch the gimp play behind a bad line like other quarterbacks have done. Then we can watch them cry about how super stats don't have time to throw the ball. lmao

GuitarBytes said:

A question for those Dak lovers, do you know if there is a reliable source, where it is said that another team's interest in Dak has been shown? since many here say that Dak is better than Stafford, seeing when he was given by Stafford (2 first rounds a 3rd round and apart a QB number one overall selection) besides several teams were interested in him also offering a lot for him; if Dak is supposedly better than Stafford, why hasn't he piqued Stafford's interest?

Click to expand...

Ummm.. has Dak even hinted that he wants out the way Stafford did? And is there another team desperate to get rid of their QB as the Rams were? I pretty much guarantee you that if Jerry had called up the Rams and offered them Dak for Goff the Rams would have jumped on it with both feet. Virtually every media outlet has already reported that Dak is the #1 free agent on the market. Stafford was not a free agent.. He was under contract with a deal that comes off the books in two years. Oh and did I mention that he is owed like 20 million dollars less than Dak would make over that span? The extra compensation was needed to get Detroit to absorb Goff's ridiculous contract and had little to nothing to do with Stafford's comparative worth. But you already knew that.

Killerinstinct said:

4 year deal at near 40 mil per.

If it didn't work out and you find yourself in a similar situation that the Rams were just in.

How many no 1's would you have to trade to rid yourself of Dak's (much worse than Goff's) contract and obtain a legitimate contending QB?

Click to expand...

He never wanted 40 million. Another misinformed lie to promote a troll agenda. Delete your account. We won’t miss you.

laughably, it was dak fans like me that told you Goff wasn’t all that when you were proclaiming him a qb god three years ago and yearning for dak to be him.

just another thing you trolls got wrong.

the dak groupie going to quote Jimmy on what he said about Dak or are they going to hate Jimmy for saying Rodgers and Stafford is better. Hum