- Messages
- 77,821
- Reaction score
- 40,636
Without question he should be a legit consideration.
I know BPA- but I’d feel a lot better about Pitts if we could secure a trade for Gallup 1st. I don’t want to trade Gallup, but the reality is that it’s going to come down to him or Amari and I won’t be surprised to see Amari restructured with the cap being tight this year. Cashing in on an extra pick for Gallup while adding Pitts to keep the offense high powered does make some sense. Just not sure what Gallup’s worth is...gotta imagine he’ll net us at least a 4th comp if let walk after the year so I’d need at least an earlyish 3rd
We need D!So you want us to take Pitts over any other player ?
Got it
For you needy folk.
On face value, a TE at 10 seems ridiculous but while the Cowboys have a lot of skill position talent on offense and have an emerged Dalton Schultz as a legit starter they do not have this kind of dynamic presence at the position. (First one to say Blake Jarwin gets Butcher head noogies.)
That's not to say he's my target. I want to use that pick for a QB. Probably in a trade up. But this is why you acquire talent in the draft and why you must consider Pitts because he gives you something special.
You draft the talent and worry about how he fits later.I love Pitts, but question his fit with the Cowboys. However, I don't see him still being there at 10. Many legit insiders are linking him the the Eagles.
I agree with a top 10 pick, but not so much outside of that range, where it more about best player in a need position.You draft the talent and worry about how he fits later.
Taking a TE at 10 is worse than taking a RB at 4... who would do a dumb thing like that...
no this guy has the talent to be as good as the KC te.So a more talented Jarwin. And maybe blocks as well as Jarwin. With all the vertical weapons who is going to catch the underneath stuff. The offense is stacked, you could convince me to take OL but a TE at #10 when there are so many other pressing needs.
So a more talented Jarwin. And maybe blocks as well as Jarwin. With all the vertical weapons who is going to catch the underneath stuff. The offense is stacked, you could convince me to take OL but a TE at #10 when there are so many other pressing needs.
I dont consider him good, but all the allure others have i the fact he is a converted WR.Lol where do people get the idea that Jarwin is even any good at all? Dude is rarely healthy, and even when he is, will disappear for games at a time.
That is said every year about 1st round TE. Either Kelce, or Graham or Gates of yesteryear. The best TEs in the league most of them were not 1st rounders.no this guy has the talent to be as good as the KC te.
I agree with a top 10 pick, but not so much outside of that range, where it more about best player in a need position.