Cole Beasley: Major production upgrade!

PAPPYDOG · Feb 25, 2021

What a difference a good passing game/QB produces?

Cole Beasley stats
Career stats

Year
Team
REC
YDS
AVG
LNG
TD
ATT
YDS
AVG

2020
Bills
82
967
11.8
35
4
0
0
-

2019
Bills
67
778
11.6
51
6
0
0
-

2018
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
65
672
10.3
32
3
0
0
-

2017
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
36
314
8.7
54
4
0
0
-
2016
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
75
833
11.1
47
5
1
7
7.0

TwoDeep3 · Feb 25, 2021

Once again you use stats to prove this game is a complete mystery to you. Just like formatting the stats lines on this platform.

DoctorChicken · Feb 25, 2021

Wow, @PAPPYDOG finding excuse lame excuse to bash Dak. How original.

CATCH17 · Feb 25, 2021

The stats don't show it but in 2016 he was just as big of a reason for our success as anyone.

ShortRound · Feb 25, 2021

Because Cole Beasley is the key to a Super Bowl? lol

Ranched · Feb 25, 2021

Yawn!

Tangle_Foot · Feb 25, 2021

His wife was holding him back in Dallas :laugh:

bayeslife · Feb 25, 2021

Lmao Beasley would be WR4 here

gimmesix · Feb 25, 2021

CATCH17 said:
The stats don't show it but in 2016 he was just as big of a reason for our success as anyone.

Right. It was Linehan's one good coaching year as offensive coordinator (but also demonstrated his and Garrett's inability to adjust strategy). We let Beasley eat up one-on-one coverage in the slot because corners couldn't figure out if he was cutting inside or out. Teams were still worried about Bryant deep, so they left Beasley singled up. Late in the season, a few teams adjusted and bracketed him while giving Dez more one-on-one looks.

The next year, defenses started using the bracket coverage from the start, forcing Dez and Dak to beat them with more downfield throws ... and they couldn't connect. Dak didn't like throwing into tight coverage and injuries robbed Dez of his ability to win those one-on-ones without refining his route-running skills.

After Dez was cut, we tried to make Beasley a No. 1 receiver and surrounded him with nothing until we traded for Cooper as a No. 1. His numbers are a reflection of all of these issues not his ability.

Tussinman · Feb 25, 2021

bayeslife said:
Lmao Beasley would be WR4 here

Exactly. When he played for us he was arguably only the eighth best player on our offense. Of course he flourished in a system in which he was of higher value.

I love how people are trying to use the bills approached to him as validation to how he would have or could have been here. That's not how it works

gimmesix · Feb 25, 2021

bayeslife said:
Lmao Beasley would be WR4 here

He would have been the No. 3 receiver two years ago when we signed Cobb to replace him. And if we had signed Beasley to a long-term deal, I'm doubtful that we would have drafted Lamb.

Typhus · Feb 25, 2021

I kept thinking that Beasley would be done in this league in no time,,,, good for the Beas to have survived as long as he has.
He has done well for himself.

Nav22 · Feb 25, 2021

PAPPYDOG said:
What a difference a good passing game/QB produces?

Cole Beasley stats
Career stats

Year
Team
REC
YDS
AVG
LNG
TD
ATT
YDS
AVG

2020
Bills
82
967
11.8
35
4
0
0
-

2019
Bills
67
778
11.6
51
6
0
0
-

2018
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
65
672
10.3
32
3
0
0
-

2017
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
36
314
8.7
54
4
0
0
-
2016
https://ssl.***NOT-ALLOWED***/onebox/media/sports/logos/-zeHm0cuBjZXc2HRxRAI0g_28x21.png
Cowboys
75
833
11.1
47
5
1
7
7.0

You should know that you’re considered a joke here.

Kingofholland · Feb 25, 2021

Can we please throw in Randall Cobb, Amari Cooper, and Dez Bryant into the mix too since they also played with Dak and another team?

You act like Cole Beasley became a superstar after leaving dallas. He's a good player and has done pretty much what expected.

GMO415 · Feb 25, 2021

Dude's in the rearview. Let him remain there.

Rayman70 · Feb 25, 2021

Ron Weasley or Beasley?

LACowboysFan1 · Feb 26, 2021

gimmesix said:
Right. It was Linehan's one good coaching year as offensive coordinator (but also demonstrated his and Garrett's inability to adjust strategy). We let Beasley eat up one-on-one coverage in the slot because corners couldn't figure out if he was cutting inside or out. Teams were still worried about Bryant deep, so they left Beasley singled up. Late in the season, a few teams adjusted and bracketed him while giving Dez more one-on-one looks.

The next year, defenses started using the bracket coverage from the start, forcing Dez and Dak to beat them with more downfield throws ... and they couldn't connect. Dak didn't like throwing into tight coverage and injuries robbed Dez of his ability to win those one-on-ones without refining his route-running skills.

After Dez was cut, we tried to make Beasley a No. 1 receiver and surrounded him with nothing until we traded for Cooper as a No. 1. His numbers are a reflection of all of these issues not his ability.

Beasley was never thought of as the no. 1 receiver, Dez left after the 2017 season and they tried to make Terrance Williams the no. 1 guy.
Beasley was the slot receiver with the occasional outside/deep route thrown in....

gimmesix · Feb 26, 2021

LACowboysFan1 said:
Beasley was never thought of as the no. 1 receiver, Dez left after the 2017 season and they tried to make Terrance Williams the no. 1 guy.
Beasley was the slot receiver with the occasional outside/deep route thrown in....

I don't think there was ever a plan for Williams to be the No. 1 guy. During the 2018 offseason, they worked on having Beasley run more deep routes because they wanted him to be a threat all over the field. They said they didn't plan to have a true No.1 but be more receiver by committee, but it seemed pretty clear to me that they wanted Beasley to be the top guy and tried to turn him into something he wasn't.

https://sportdfw.com/2018/09/21/dallas-cowboys-cole-beasley-no-1-receiver/

LACowboysFan1 · Mar 1, 2021

gimmesix said:
I don't think there was ever a plan for Williams to be the No. 1 guy. During the 2018 offseason, they worked on having Beasley run more deep routes because they wanted him to be a threat all over the field. They said they didn't plan to have a true No.1 but be more receiver by committee, but it seemed pretty clear to me that they wanted Beasley to be the top guy and tried to turn him into something he wasn't.

https://sportdfw.com/2018/09/21/dallas-cowboys-cole-beasley-no-1-receiver/

So the Cowboys planned on a 5-8 Beasley being more of a primary target than a 6-2 Williams?

I don't think so....

Doomsday101 · Mar 1, 2021

So explain why Copper numbers got better in Dallas than with the Raiders?

Cole Beasley: Major production upgrade!

There are no Dak haters just Cowboy lovers!!!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

1st Round Pick

Well-Known Member

"We Are Penn State"

Well-Known Member

187beatdown

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Well-Known Member

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Captain Catfish

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member