Signed by Cowboys ***Cowboys and QB Dak Prescott have agreed to new contract***

buybuydandavis

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,699
Reaction score
20,776
I agree with you on Gallup. I've been on the trade Gallup train for a while. I'd try to trade Gallup for at least a 1st. I think we can get more than that for Gallup. He's the easiest to replace in the draft as WRs are frequently available in the draft. Unless the WR is elite, then, just as with a RB, you can just trade and replace them in the draft.

I doubt we get anywhere near that high for Gallup with only a year left. I'd trade him for a 3rd and be happy. A recent PFF article hypothesized getting a 3 and 4 from Miami. In a second.

If we had traded him after drafting Lamb, maybe some team would have still considered him a possible WR1. After last season, not.

As you say, less than elite WRs are replaceable in the draft. A team that needs #2 might give us something for him, but not a 1 or 2.

For us, Cedrick isn't as good, but he seems to have a lot of chemistry with Dak. Should be fine as a possession receiver to move the chains on 3rd down.
 

88sAndHeartbreak

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,578
Reaction score
2,243

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,650
Reaction score
7,395
No you didn’t. You imposed a meaning on my statement that was never there in the first place. And I provided you the clear context and then you wrote all this trope that has zero to do with football related opinions, and now your trying to present it like your asking for my clarification what I mean, when you were trying to tell me what I meant.
:lmao::lmao::lmao2::lmao::lmao2:Chenorbyl:banghead:
 

plymkr

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,337
Reaction score
13,856

stiletto

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
12,801
No you didn’t. You imposed a meaning on my statement that was never there in the first place. And I provided you the clear context and then you wrote all this trope that has zero to do with football related opinions, and now your trying to present it like your asking for my clarification what I mean, when you were trying to tell me what I meant.

You are the biggest babbler I've ever seen. Still giving no positions at all besides Romo slobbing. It seems you just hate everything, hate all that is going on with the Cowboys but you ultimately just loved Romo at all cost of reason and Romo should still be the Cowboys QB. Ok I get it, we get it....go forth and conquer, sit over there with "your precious" Romo.. Oh BTW. I liked Romo too but sometimes you gotta turn the page. Offer up other solutions or ****.....

tenor.png
 

RustyBourneHorse

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,527
Reaction score
42,320
I doubt we get anywhere near that high for Gallup with only a year left. I'd trade him for a 3rd and be happy. A recent PFF article hypothesized getting a 3 and 4 from Miami. In a second.

If we had traded him after drafting Lamb, maybe some team would have still considered him a possible WR1. After last season, not.

As you say, less than elite WRs are replaceable in the draft. A team that needs #2 might give us something for him, but not a 1 or 2.

For us, Cedrick isn't as good, but he seems to have a lot of chemistry with Dak. Should be fine as a possession receiver to move the chains on 3rd down.

Maybe we can get a 2nd? Still better than a comp 3. THough, I guess I'd take a 3 for Gallup too if needed. Cedric can pick up the slack, and we can even find good WRs undrafted. I'd take the 3rd and 4 from Miami for Lamb. That's a good deal.
 

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,650
Reaction score
7,395
No I am asking you to elaborate on why your reasons to "not pay for entertainment". I read your previous post and it was dumb even trying to put it in context. You are all over the place like a M&M on a Yugo's dashboard. You are saying you hate the Dak signing, you hate Dak, and everything sucks but Romo?? Dude, I've read your posts, you are just a straight up Dak hater/troll. There is no objective reasoning with people like you. You are the type of nozzle that no matter what Dak does, not good enough....or someone helped him. No one takes your ilk serious. Tonight you are just another Wile E Coyote. Enjoy the next 5-6 years.
Stop wasting your time with @khiladi...

what do you think these Dak Less Lovers would be sayin if Prescott was traded or released
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,551
Reaction score
34,374
They were 3-1 to start the season when we beat them in Green Bay and they won their next game after they lost to us. Stop it.

And they proceeded to, like I said, lose the next four-5 games and were a hot mess. And there defense got worse by the end of the season and into the playoffs, you know when we actually struggled against them. Meaning all the Ls and all the horrible defense was closer to the GB we played in the playoffs with HFA I might add. So no, how about you stop it.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,551
Reaction score
34,374
The 2.3billion valuation of the team is per a 2014 article.
By Ryan Wilson Jun 12, 2014

Per Forbes, the Cowboys were *again (5 years in a row) the most valuable sports franchise in the world, worth 5.5bil in July 2020.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtba...t-valuable-sports-teams-2020/?sh=53c6d9903c74

Dak's yearly cap is less than 1% of that value.

Its probably more accurate to talk about revenue when discussing Dak’s cap in respect to ‘value’. It went down last year because of COVID, but in 2019, it was 980 million.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/193553/revenue-of-national-football-league-teams-in-2010/
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,551
Reaction score
34,374
You are the biggest babbler I've ever seen. Still giving no positions at all besides Romo slobbing. It seems you just hate everything, hate all that is going on with the Cowboys but you ultimately just loved Romo at all cost of reason and Romo should still be the Cowboys QB. Ok I get it, we get it....go forth and conquer, sit over there with "your precious" Romo.. Oh BTW. I liked Romo too but sometimes you gotta turn the page. Offer up other solutions or ****.....

tenor.png

So you decide to continue to write more trope after the quote you claimed meant what it did, meant nothing of the sort. And then you’ll pretend like you aren’t taking it personal either. You are more persistent than Gollum.
 

MarcusRock

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,840
Reaction score
16,028
And they proceeded to, like I said, lose the next four games and were a hot mess. And there defense got worse by the end of the season. So no, how about you stop it.

The offense averaged 26 points a game that season. The defense averaged 19 points given up that season. Again, I ask. Who did their jobs twice against Green Bay and who didn't 1 of those times?
 

stiletto

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,907
Reaction score
12,801
So you decide to continue to write more trope after the quote you claimed meant what it did, meant nothing of the sort. You are more persistent than Gollum.

No I just reply to see the diarrhea of the keyboard that you produce. It amuses me. LOL
 
Top