Video: Who Will Be Available At 10? Bryan's Gang Of 7 Weighs In | GBag Nation

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,766
Reaction score
18,984
Yeah, I think I make the trade if Chase or Smith is their but not Waddle. Giants might take Waddle but I doubt the Eagles do after taking Reagar last year.
Heard a rumor a few weeks back that the Eagles love Waddle
 

cheyennes

Well-Known Member
Messages
905
Reaction score
549
For me it really depends on the situation. What if the draft goes:
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4. Fields
5. Pitts
6. Lance
7. Chase
8. Slater
9. Waddle

That leaves Surtain, Sewell, Horn, Chase, and Parsons on the board. You’ve got the Chargers desperate to jump Giants for Sewell offering 13 + 47 (1580 points) for 10 + 99 (1409 points).

To me you’ve got to take it. There’s every chance with Sewell off the board that the Giant take Chase or Parsons leaving Horn/Surtain at 13, if not both. And worse case is you’re stuck with Parsons or Darrisaw, there are going to be good corners in the second and you’ve got two picks now.

Chase gone with the 7 pick,

Devonta Smith or Sewel, take him, If you trade for 13 , we can pick any CB aviable, Surtain or Horn
 

Bizwah

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,136
Reaction score
3,853
Smith went at pick seven almost every time with the "gang of 7". I'm curious if they've heard something.
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,420
Reaction score
13,144
I wonder what will happens if Pitts is available at 7 or 8?
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4. Fields
5. Sewell
6. Chase
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,479
Reaction score
17,858
For me it really depends on the situation. What if the draft goes:
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4. Fields
5. Pitts
6. Lance
7. Chase
8. Slater
9. Waddle

That leaves Surtain, Sewell, Horn, Chase, and Parsons on the board. You’ve got the Chargers desperate to jump Giants for Sewell offering 13 + 47 (1580 points) for 10 + 99 (1409 points).

To me you’ve got to take it. There’s every chance with Sewell off the board that the Giant take Chase or Parsons leaving Horn/Surtain at 13, if not both. And worse case is you’re stuck with Parsons or Darrisaw, there are going to be good corners in the second and you’ve got two picks now.
if this happens then you take the trade. I would love to have parsons, but a CB like Surtain or Horn would be fantastic and having that extra pick would mean a saftey and DT in the 2nd. LBs in the third. that's a quick fix and lot of talent added in first three rounds.....Sewell might be enticing, but then we need to gamble and wait for next year.

p.s.

I doubt if Jones goes in the top half of first round.
 

Hardline

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,769
Reaction score
36,287
Pitts
Chase
Sewell
Will be the first 3 non QBs taken and in that order.

No player I want will make it to 10.

Surtain is probably my favorite consolation prize .
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,342
Reaction score
48,190
For me it really depends on the situation. What if the draft goes:
1. Lawrence
2. Wilson
3. Jones
4. Fields
5. Pitts
6. Lance
7. Chase
8. Slater
9. Waddle

That leaves Surtain, Sewell, Horn, Chase, and Parsons on the board. You’ve got the Chargers desperate to jump Giants for Sewell offering 13 + 47 (1580 points) for 10 + 99 (1409 points).

To me you’ve got to take it. There’s every chance with Sewell off the board that the Giant take Chase or Parsons leaving Horn/Surtain at 13, if not both. And worse case is you’re stuck with Parsons or Darrisaw, there are going to be good corners in the second and you’ve got two picks now.
Sewell for sure if he falls that far
 

Xavier187

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,120
Reaction score
591
I think Chase will be a Bengal. Not Sewell.
It's to much of a perfect scenario for burrow and with a deep Oline class this year they can get him and get oline later
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,420
Reaction score
13,144
Every once in a while, even a blind squirrel finds a nut.
They might have a lot of nuts.
Lamb for at least 5 years
Diggs
Gallimore has potential
The starting center from Wisconsin.
Plus the 3 rookies that didn't play hardly at all. Those would be Robinson, Anae, and Benard. All 3 of them have potential.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,112
Reaction score
46,611
They might have a lot of nuts.
Lamb for at least 5 years
Diggs
Gallimore has potential
The starting center from Wisconsin.
Plus the 3 rookies that didn't play hardly at all. Those would be Robinson, Anae, and Benard. All 3 of them have potential.
I was referring to in drafts overall. Not often the Cowboys draft well.
 
Top