Cowboys Experimenting With Tony Pollard at Wide Receiver in OTAs

Buzzbait

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,291
Reaction score
11,250
So, according to you, the OC can't give an RB more plays at WR unless he is the greatest of all time? You think this couldn't be done unless McCarthy thought of it. You're a hater of Kellen Moore if you think that little of him.......

Joe you're so quick to argue that you can't even comprehend what you read.
I never said it couldn't be done without McCarthy thinking of it. Wake up Joe!
I stated "We don't know whose idea it was to start working out Pollard at WR. That word could've come from the HC just as easily as not."

And no I'm not a so-called "hater" of Kellen Moore.
What I stated was "As far as I'm concerned, the jury is not in yet on Moore." That does not indicate hatred, it indicates indecision.
Joe you really need to work on your reading comprehension.
 
Last edited:

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Joe you're so quick to argue that you can't even comprehend what you read.
I never said it couldn't be done without McCarthy thinking of it. Wake up Joe!
I stated "We don't know whose idea it was to start working out Pollard at WR. That word could've come from the HC just as easily as not."
And no I'm not a so-called "hater" of Kellen Moore.
What I stated was "As far as I'm concerned, the jury is not in yet on Moore." That does not indicate hatred, it indicates indecision.
Joe you really need to work on your reading comprehension.
Back to my original post. I said words to the effect, this was Kellen Moore giving Pollard a bigger role. It's my thoughts my opinion. But you hate Kellen so much that you can not let my own thoughts stand on their own. I gave KM a little credit for trying to help out one of his players, that's all this is... and you being petty. I comprehend plenty. Shame on you for the personal attack on my intelligence, just because of your petty hatred of Kellen Moore. Mods please discipline this fool.
 

Buzzbait

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,291
Reaction score
11,250
Back to my original post. I said words to the effect, this was Kellen Moore giving Pollard a bigger role. It's my thoughts my opinion. But you hate Kellen so much that you can not let my own thoughts stand on their own. I gave KM a little credit for trying to help out one of his players, that's all this is... and you being petty. I comprehend plenty. Shame on you for the personal attack on my intelligence, just because of your petty hatred of Kellen Moore. Mods please discipline this fool.

You totally misrepresented my post just so you could argue. You might comprehend it if you took the time to read it before you started arguing. You chose to argue instead.
Now you're making false accusations and calling names.
 
Last edited:

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
You totally misrepresented my post just so you could argue. You might comprehend it if you took the time to read it before you started arguing. You chose to argue instead.
Now you're making false accusations and calling names.
My original post was not meant to be controversial in any way, just me sharing a thought. It was you that decided to reply with an argument. So excuse me if I'm now full of piss and vinegar ready for a fight. You bushwacked me first so you're damn right I'm up to argue now. If you didn't start anything there wouldn't be anything. Put up or shut up!
 

Buzzbait

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,291
Reaction score
11,250
My original post was not meant to be controversial in any way, just me sharing a thought. It was you that decided to reply with an argument. So excuse me if I'm now full of piss and vinegar ready for a fight. You bushwacked me first so you're damn right I'm up to argue now. If you didn't start anything there wouldn't be anything. Put up or shut up!

Same here Joe. Here's the original:
Your post:
"This is Kellen Moore's way of maximizing the skills of Tony Pollard.
Click to expand..."


My reply:
"Kellen Moore? Maybe. Maybe McCarthy. At this point, I don't see Moore as the be-all end-all."

There's nothing controversial there in either posts. I don't see anything there to argue about. You posted your thought and I did the same. Where's the controversy??
No accusations, no hatred for Moore, no nothing. There's nothing there to argue about.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Same here Joe. Here's the original:
Your post:
"This is Kellen Moore's way of maximizing the skills of Tony Pollard.
Click to expand..."


My reply:
"Kellen Moore? Maybe. Maybe McCarthy. At this point, I don't see Moore as the be-all end-all."

There's nothing controversial there in either posts. I don't see anything there to argue about. You posted your thought and I did the same. Where's the controversy??
No accusations, no hatred for Moore, no nothing. There's nothing there to argue about.
We are done here, stop harassing me. It's over. Finito. No need for you to reply.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
46,290
Reaction score
26,408
This is the kinda stuff I hate about this front office.

We have 3 great wide receivers, and they are busy trying to find a way to use a backup Rb at that position.

I hate their obsession with "Flex".
 

Ranched

"We Are Penn State"
Messages
34,885
Reaction score
84,323
Great idea. If Coop, Gallup, & Lamb stay healthy, there won’t be a ton of snaps for others at WR, but showing versatility shouldn’t hurt Pollard’s bid for more playing time somewhere in the offense.
 

cheyennes

Well-Known Member
Messages
905
Reaction score
549
He was good in College, dangerous in RPO , a playmaker, he is better in the passing game
 
Top