Cool story, dude.
That so-called start isn't until September. Much can happen between now and then.
Childish response. We needed him to play all 17 games, he only played 5. That's not good enough. Call it whatever you want.
Not my point you utterly obtuse individual. My point is giving up on a second year player is the dumbest thing you could ever do. Imagine if every team in the nfl gave up on players after 2 years. No one could field a 53 man roster. I really hope this is not your actual opinion or you should really stop watching football.
Ohhhh. So you’re in the front office now? Stating opinion as fact. Here’s a fact for you. Looney got hurt. Biadasz came in. Looney was healthy. Biadasz got hurt. Looney played. Actually I think biadasz got hurt playing when looney was cleared to play. So your entire notion is ridiculous. Go take a nap.Cool story, dude.
Too bad it isn't true. They kept Looney because they didn't have faith in Biadasz completing the season and they were right. Your imagination tells really good stories so I do hope you have some more.
What 17 games?!
Who is suggesting we give up a second-year player? Pay attention to what I'm saying and stop hearing what you want to hear. Biadasz can turn this all around with a good season in 2021, however, he's not going to look good at all if his health fails him again like it did in 2020.
But you love LVE, lol.
So your argument is teams cut experienced veterans that are already under contract and they already know can do the job in favor of a 4th round rookie they can’t work with before training camp and who they can’t even see in a preseason game...Cool story, dude.
Too bad it isn't true. They kept Looney because they didn't have faith in Biadasz completing the season and they were right. Your imagination tells really good stories so I do hope you have some more.
An “epic” tale of a team keeping an experienced starter who is already under contract on the roster when they could cut him and go with a 4th round rookie without even so much as a single preseason snap as the only center on the team.You and @OmerV ought to get together to collaborate on an epic tale. God knows you two tell a few around here.
Nope, not what I'm saying at all. Now I'm done wasting time on you. Welcome to my ignore list.So your argument is teams cut experienced veterans that are already under contract and they already know can do the job in favor of a 4th round rookie they can’t work with before training camp and who they can’t even see in a preseason game...
And they kept Looney even with an All Pro center on the team, yet you think the team would cut him once they got a 4th round rookie they weren’t even going to see in a preseason game….
yeah, cool story
By the way, your argument that they didn’t think Biadas complete the season actually supports my comment that the Cowboys expected Looney to be around all along, and hurts your argument he was a huge disappointment. By your argument the Cowboys expected him to be a “huge disappointment” even when they used a 4 th round pick on him.
Besides, the fact Looney is gone now clearly shows the Cowboys were happy with what they learned about Biadasz last year.
If that’s not what you are saying you should have typed different words.
Welcome to Joe's Ignore Club!
Then most of the league are failures
He’s not going anywhere while under his rookie deal
The oline is probably the most important part of a team that needs continuity
