Video: DC: Tyler Biadasz: I Take Pride In My Job

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,651
Reaction score
30,945
Who is suggesting we give up a second-year player? Pay attention to what I'm saying and stop hearing what you want to hear. Biadasz can turn this all around with a good season in 2021, however, he's not going to look good at all if his health fails him again like it did in 2020.
Ummm. You did. Literally said if he gets hurt this season to cut him.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Ummm. You did. Literally said if he gets hurt this season to cut him.
You argue just to argue. You literally read the first sentence and ignored the rest of that post. If only you kept reading. I'm to the point of ignoring you.
 

pgreptom

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
551
He was drafted to be the guy after Fredbeard retired. He's been nothing but a disappointment. You watch the video. It's time to be the man at the center position or cut bait with this guy.

The kid was a 4th round draft pick. If this was Travis and picked in the 1st I'd get it. We're going to be fortunate if he can hold down a starting spot for 17 games in his second season. Don't forget he had no offseason last year either.. dude was hella raw. Parcells 3 year rule comes into play here.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
The kid was a 4th round draft pick. If this was Travis and picked in the 1st I'd get it. We're going to be fortunate if he can hold down a starting spot for 17 games in his second season. Don't forget he had no offseason last year either.. dude was hella raw. Parcells 3 year rule comes into play here.
If Parcells 3 year rule was in effect, Looney would still be on the roster, but no, Tyler Biadasz has the weight of the word on his shoulders in year two with not net. The "kid" was supposed to do this last year but got a hammy injury. Maybe he'll have better luck in year two.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
Biadasz got a good taste for NFL center and I think the kid is going to be a great Center. Like many Wisconsin OL he was coached damn well and he has the tools to do the job. I think this thread is a waste of time

 

pgreptom

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,798
Reaction score
551
If Parcells 3 year rule was in effect, Looney would still be on the roster, but no, Tyler Biadasz has the weight of the word on his shoulders in year two with not net. The "kid" was supposed to do this last year but got a hammy injury. Maybe he'll have better luck in year two.

Sigh.

Looney was a free agent acquisition. The Parcells rule applies to rookies. You new here???

Tyler should definitely be improved, just from a full offseason and an actual training camp...
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Sigh.

Looney was a free agent acquisition. The Parcells rule applies to rookies. You new here???

Tyler should definitely be improved, just from a full offseason and an actual training camp...
You just don't get it. Parcells' rule says a rookie(player #1) gets 3 years to be a starter... but someone else(player #2) has to be the starter while the rookie is developing as a rookie and in year two. Then in year 3, player #1 is ready to be the starter.

That's not what is happening now. The current coaching staff does not employ Bill Parcell's rule for rookies. How do we know this? Because Tyler Biadasz was drafted out of the same school Travis Fredbeard came from to be his replacement. Yes, a fourth-round draft pick was expected to fill those shoes but because that is much to expect from a rookie, Joe Looney was there to be his backup. That's a good thing because last year, Tyler Biadasz was only capable of playing 5 games. Now, in Tyler's second year he is healthy once again and once again he is expected to carry the load as the starting center, however, the difference this year, Joe Looney is not here to back him up. The coaches must know something about Tyler Biadasz to show that much faith in him in year 2. It's certainly not what Bill Parcells would do. We have several players on this team that are rookies or in year 2 that will be starters this year. Diggs, Parsons are two other examples of this. It's not how Bill Parcells operated. Understand this! Bill Parcells rule is not in effect here. Are you new here?
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,640
Reaction score
12,794
You just don't get it. Parcells' rule says a rookie(player #1) gets 3 years to be a starter... but someone else(player #2) has to be the starter while the rookie is developing as a rookie and in year two. Then in year 3, player #1 is ready to be the starter.

That's not what is happening now. The current coaching staff does not employ Bill Parcell's rule for rookies. How do we know this? Because Tyler Biadasz was drafted out of the same school Travis Fredbeard came from to be his replacement. Yes, a fourth-round draft pick was expected to fill those shoes but because that is much to expect from a rookie, Joe Looney was there to be his backup. That's a good thing because last year, Tyler Biadasz was only capable of playing 5 games. Now, in Tyler's second year he is healthy once again and once again he is expected to carry the load as the starting center, however, the difference this year, Joe Looney is not here to back him up. The coaches must know something about Tyler Biadasz to show that much faith in him in year 2. It's certainly not what Bill Parcells would do. We have several players on this team that are rookies or in year 2 that will be starters this year. Diggs, Parsons are two other examples of this. It's not how Bill Parcells operated. Understand this! Bill Parcells rule is not in effect here. Are you new here?
Why should we care about Bill Parcells?
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Why should we care about Bill Parcells?
Because the person I was directly addressing was under the impression that Parcells's rule on Rookies getting 3 years to work themselves up to a position to be a starter is still in effect. I was just informing this poster that the current coaching philosophy believes in empowering rookies much sooner.
 

CowboyFanInLexKy

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
925
Now you are comparing Biadasz with Sean Lee? LOL Now who's drinking too much? LOL
Really Troll? Are you kidding me with that? I just asked how long Sean Lee has been with the team (and how long the Cowboys put up with his playing half seasons every year) yet Biadasz is in his second year and you're saying cut him because he can't complete a year??
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,471
Reaction score
30,977
Really Troll? Are you kidding me with that? I just asked how long Sean Lee has been with the team (and how long the Cowboys put up with his playing half seasons every year) yet Biadasz is in his second year and you're saying cut him because he can't complete a year??
Still comparing Baidasz to Sean Lee. That's how weak your argument is. Sean Lee was a contributor to this team before he ever got hurt, Tyler Biadasz has contributed nothing. Get that weak crap out of here!
 

cowboyed

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,409
Reaction score
1,569
Biadasz got a good taste for NFL center and I think the kid is going to be a great Center. Like many Wisconsin OL he was coached damn well and he has the tools to do the job. I think this thread is a waste of time



So is 1-ply toilet paper!
 

jnday

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,282
Reaction score
11,404
Because the person I was directly addressing was under the impression that Parcells's rule on Rookies getting 3 years to work themselves up to a position to be a starter is still in effect. I was just informing this poster that the current coaching philosophy believes in empowering rookies much sooner.
Parcells gave rookies three years. That doesn’t mean the rookie has to take three years before starting.
 
Top