JoeKing
Diehard
- Messages
- 35,513
- Reaction score
- 31,000
No, I don't recall the entire league only playing 5 games last season. Stop being so ridiculous. LOLThen most of the league are failures
No, I don't recall the entire league only playing 5 games last season. Stop being so ridiculous. LOLThen most of the league are failures
I'll make a note of that and send you an attaboy if you're right in a couple of years.He’s not going anywhere while under his rookie deal
Ummm. You did. Literally said if he gets hurt this season to cut him.Who is suggesting we give up a second-year player? Pay attention to what I'm saying and stop hearing what you want to hear. Biadasz can turn this all around with a good season in 2021, however, he's not going to look good at all if his health fails him again like it did in 2020.
Some players didn’t play at all. Joe burrow got hurt in mid season. Bengals should cut himNo, I don't recall the entire league only playing 5 games last season. Stop being so ridiculous. LOL
You argue just to argue. You literally read the first sentence and ignored the rest of that post. If only you kept reading. I'm to the point of ignoring you.Ummm. You did. Literally said if he gets hurt this season to cut him.
Talking to you is just a waste of time. Welcome to my ignore list.Some players didn’t play at all. Joe burrow got hurt in mid season. Bengals should cut him
He was drafted to be the guy after Fredbeard retired. He's been nothing but a disappointment. You watch the video. It's time to be the man at the center position or cut bait with this guy.
If Parcells 3 year rule was in effect, Looney would still be on the roster, but no, Tyler Biadasz has the weight of the word on his shoulders in year two with not net. The "kid" was supposed to do this last year but got a hammy injury. Maybe he'll have better luck in year two.The kid was a 4th round draft pick. If this was Travis and picked in the 1st I'd get it. We're going to be fortunate if he can hold down a starting spot for 17 games in his second season. Don't forget he had no offseason last year either.. dude was hella raw. Parcells 3 year rule comes into play here.
If Parcells 3 year rule was in effect, Looney would still be on the roster, but no, Tyler Biadasz has the weight of the word on his shoulders in year two with not net. The "kid" was supposed to do this last year but got a hammy injury. Maybe he'll have better luck in year two.
You just don't get it. Parcells' rule says a rookie(player #1) gets 3 years to be a starter... but someone else(player #2) has to be the starter while the rookie is developing as a rookie and in year two. Then in year 3, player #1 is ready to be the starter.Sigh.
Looney was a free agent acquisition. The Parcells rule applies to rookies. You new here???
Tyler should definitely be improved, just from a full offseason and an actual training camp...
If I was to imagine what a typical Wisconsin football player looked like, it would be this guy.
Why should we care about Bill Parcells?You just don't get it. Parcells' rule says a rookie(player #1) gets 3 years to be a starter... but someone else(player #2) has to be the starter while the rookie is developing as a rookie and in year two. Then in year 3, player #1 is ready to be the starter.
That's not what is happening now. The current coaching staff does not employ Bill Parcell's rule for rookies. How do we know this? Because Tyler Biadasz was drafted out of the same school Travis Fredbeard came from to be his replacement. Yes, a fourth-round draft pick was expected to fill those shoes but because that is much to expect from a rookie, Joe Looney was there to be his backup. That's a good thing because last year, Tyler Biadasz was only capable of playing 5 games. Now, in Tyler's second year he is healthy once again and once again he is expected to carry the load as the starting center, however, the difference this year, Joe Looney is not here to back him up. The coaches must know something about Tyler Biadasz to show that much faith in him in year 2. It's certainly not what Bill Parcells would do. We have several players on this team that are rookies or in year 2 that will be starters this year. Diggs, Parsons are two other examples of this. It's not how Bill Parcells operated. Understand this! Bill Parcells rule is not in effect here. Are you new here?
Because the person I was directly addressing was under the impression that Parcells's rule on Rookies getting 3 years to work themselves up to a position to be a starter is still in effect. I was just informing this poster that the current coaching philosophy believes in empowering rookies much sooner.Why should we care about Bill Parcells?
Really Troll? Are you kidding me with that? I just asked how long Sean Lee has been with the team (and how long the Cowboys put up with his playing half seasons every year) yet Biadasz is in his second year and you're saying cut him because he can't complete a year??Now you are comparing Biadasz with Sean Lee? LOL Now who's drinking too much? LOL
They played 17 games last year?
Still comparing Baidasz to Sean Lee. That's how weak your argument is. Sean Lee was a contributor to this team before he ever got hurt, Tyler Biadasz has contributed nothing. Get that weak crap out of here!Really Troll? Are you kidding me with that? I just asked how long Sean Lee has been with the team (and how long the Cowboys put up with his playing half seasons every year) yet Biadasz is in his second year and you're saying cut him because he can't complete a year??
Biadasz got a good taste for NFL center and I think the kid is going to be a great Center. Like many Wisconsin OL he was coached damn well and he has the tools to do the job. I think this thread is a waste of time
Parcells gave rookies three years. That doesn’t mean the rookie has to take three years before starting.Because the person I was directly addressing was under the impression that Parcells's rule on Rookies getting 3 years to work themselves up to a position to be a starter is still in effect. I was just informing this poster that the current coaching philosophy believes in empowering rookies much sooner.
Why? Because you look foolish when a similar situation is brought up?Talking to you is just a waste of time. Welcome to my ignore list.