tyke1doe
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 53,660
- Reaction score
- 32,039
The Super Bowl reason is legit because we see it with QBs. But notable defense, notable other players? Don't know about those standards. Ware WAS our defense half the time so not sure he even meets that standard unless you consider his short time with Denver. Allen played with the pretty good DTs Pat and Kevin Williams (both Pro Bowlers) in Minnesota. Even so, if you were a standout on a defense that was pretty good and had other good players, then were you really as good as you looked? As the article said, it could help or hurt a player, particularly if you're not the first name people think of on that defense (both Allen and Ware in Dallas are -- Ware in Denver had Von Miller). As for the connected to a notable player, I'm not even sure where that comes from. All it does is give greater visibility and the player has to do the rest.
Ware played for the Dallas Cowboys. That is shine right there. And he had the stats to support his HoF resume. You don't think playing for the No Name Defense (Miami), the Purple People Eaters (Minnesota), the Steel Curtain (Pittsburgh), the Doomsday Defense (Cowboys), the 46 defense (Chicago) lends credibility to a person's HoF resume? I think so.
Be that as it may, I'm just offering MY opinion, which could be totally wrong. I hope Ware gets in because I'm a Cowboys fan. I, personally, don't care about the others and whether they get in. Have no skin in the game with Suggs, Freeney, Allen or Mathias.