New posts

Read the latest Dallas Cowboys News!
Dallas Cowboys Newswire

Defensive adjustments

Thread starter Hawkeye19
Start date Sep 15, 2021

Hawkeye19

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#1

Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

Havic

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#2

We have the personnel for it. LVE, Neal, Cox, Parsons. Big fatty Bohana in the middle.

Praxit

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#3

..wouldn't worry to much. Glad it wasn't someone in the middle. We can manage outside with fast LB's.

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#4

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

Its over buddy. But the last thing we should do is starting switching everything around. Backups gotta play. Even though they suck. DE was one of our thinest positions on the team.

Our only hope is that Goldston is somehow some sleeping stud that comes out and fills in for Gregory. I think that was his position anyway.

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#5

Praxit said:
..wouldn't worry to much. Glad it wasn't someone in the middle. We can manage outside with fast LB's.

No we cant. And we only have one of those.

panchucko

It's Back

Sep 15, 2021

#6

I can hear Kamara’s mom. AaaZzzhUur

DCBoysfan

Hardwork and Dedication

Sep 15, 2021

#7

I expect changes, I wouldn't be surprised if Dallas shows some 3-4 looks.

morat1959

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#8

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

What’s new?

stiletto

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#9

CowboyRoy said:
Its over buddy. But the last thing we should do is starting switching everything around. Backups gotta play. Even though they suck. DE was one of our thinest positions on the team.

Our only hope is that Goldston is somehow some sleeping stud that comes out and fills in for Gregory. I think that was his position anyway.

They won't find anyone to replace the Edge but they could bring in guys that might help the horrid middle of the defensive line. They could call a guy like Geno Atkins, see if he can still play. Plug up the middle. Attack it all from a different way.... I would at least try. Nothing to lose at this point...

Dak_Attack_09

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#10

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

No switch up, just plug in Anae & Armstrong.

75boyz

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#11

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

I kinda like this idea. Clustercuss or not, lol.

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#12

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

Makes total sense as they have the depth at the LB position at this time.

conner01

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#13

You run Quinn’s defense
We hired him to run the D so you tell him, here’s the players you have
Make it work
You don’t go all change everything because we lost a player
Let him do his thing with what he has and the way he wants to do it

JoeyBoy718

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#14

DE Osa
NT Bohanna
DE Gallimore

OLB Parsons
ILB LVE
ILB Smith
OLB Neal

Gaede

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#15

It would make sense to play more 3-4, considering our weaknesses in this upcoming game. Gregory will be back week after, so we can go back to 4-3 then.

So we won't do that, of course.

CWR

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#16

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

I like your style brother.

Bob-Lillys-War

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#17

Truly, I don't know if we will notice D.Law's absence .

Thats what really sucks .

75boyz

Well-Known Member

Sep 15, 2021

#18

JoeyBoy718 said:
DE Osa
NT Bohanna
DE Gallimore

OLB Parsons
ILB LVE
ILB Smith
OLB Neal

Heck, I'm okay with this actually. Maybe even Gregory at OLB when he returns instead of Neal as the starters.

nightrain

Since 1971

Sep 15, 2021

#19

Hawkeye19 said:
Well— losing D Law sucks. A lot.

Considering our strength at LBer— do we go to a 3-4 look primarily? Thinking we use a combo of Parsons, Basham, and Gregory at OLB, a combo of Neal, LVE, and Jaylon as inside backers, and a combo of Watkins/Armstrong/Golston/Osa at DE with Urban/Bohanna manning the NT?

Trade for some more beef up front that has some position flex and just try and give teams a bunch of new looks and smoke and mirrors to try and annoy them lol?!

What a frickin clustercuss

I think we will see that type of alignment on the D for a good part of the game.

Majic

Well-Known Member

Sep 16, 2021

#20

Perhaps this is an opportunity to play Parsons primarily at OLB

You must log in or register to reply here.

Share:

Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Link

Top