HoplessCowboysFan36
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 662
- Reaction score
- 877
You'd think 3 4 would be more stout against the pass then run
Where as 4 3 the opposite
If you have the right nose tackle the 3-4 works great against the run. We do not.
You'd think 3 4 would be more stout against the pass then run
Where as 4 3 the opposite
As would I…..if they want to air it out then be my guest. But running with Hurts and Sanders? I don’t want to see that.To be honest. I want Hurts standing in the pocket and throwing. I don’t want him on the edges running around and making plays.
for this upcoming game I would like to see Parsons spy hurts a lot.
As would I…..if they want to air it out then be my guest. But running with Hurts and Sanders? I don’t want to see that.
Is Reagor a speed guy though? I know Watkins is their speed guy I don’t know about Reagor.My other worry is..I dont think Diggs can stay with Reagor and Co. step for step...This will the first pure speed guys he has seen this year. I hope Quinn has something up his sleeve for this. If Hurtz is able to extend plays we might get burnt
Is Reagor a speed guy though? I know Watkins is their speed guy I don’t know about Reagor.
The 3-4 is easy enough to flip to 3-3-5The 3-4 is a run defense.
Defenses in the modern era play about 70% or more snaps in Nickel.
If a team is in a 3-4 alignment, then they are expecting run.
When a 3-4 team goes from 3-4 to Nickel, they pull the 320+ NT off the field.
- They then bring in the ~200 pound Nickel CB.
Quinn often has the DEs in Nickel standing up.
The stand-up DEs job in Quinn's defense has similarities to a 3-4 OLB.
Summary: If Parsons played 3-4 OLB then he still has to either play DE or off-ball LB on 70%+ of snaps.
TruthAnd now for reality.
The 3-4 was invented because of the lack of DE's capable of being stout enough to play as a down lineman while also being athletic enough to get to the QB. The scheme exists to more easily find players who can rush off the edge.
I always heard that the 3-4 was susceptible to the run. I admit, I have no idea.The 3-4 is a run defense.
Defenses in the modern era play about 70% or more snaps in Nickel.
If a team is in a 3-4 alignment, then they are expecting run.
When a 3-4 team goes from 3-4 to Nickel, they pull the 320+ NT off the field.
- They then bring in the ~200 pound Nickel CB.
Quinn often has the DEs in Nickel standing up.
The stand-up DEs job in Quinn's defense has similarities to a 3-4 OLB.
Summary: If Parsons played 3-4 OLB then he still has to either play DE or off-ball LB on 70%+ of snaps.
At least you admit it so kudos. I’m on the same boat.as much football as i watch, as much as i feel like i understand, i'm still a doofus when it comes to alignments and schemes.
At least you admit it so kudos. I’m on the same boat.
When X-Walker starts to inform fans...how the game is played....get your popcorn. You just never know what you are going to see.And now for reality.
The 3-4 was invented because of the lack of DE's capable of being stout enough to play as a down lineman while also being athletic enough to get to the QB. The scheme exists to more easily find players who can rush off the edge.
No, 3-4 is a stronger run defense alignment.You'd think 3 4 would be more stout against the pass then run
Where as 4 3 the opposite
wait, I thought 4-3 was a run defense and 3-4 was a pass rushing, pass defense....one of the main reasons 3-4 came to be was the difficulty in finding a pass rushing 4-3 DE, instead they took these smallish DEs or LBs and made them pass rushers, because they were fast and they didn't have to line up with hands down on the ground against LTs and RTs. plus it was much easier to disguise the pass rush with a 3-4 from same look. generally its a smaller front 7 (despite the NT), since you take a DL man and replace him with a LB, so more suspect to runs if the guards can get to the second level.
now, the nickle requires a different look and I have seen the 3-3-5 look, with a saftey in the box that can drop or cover. in essence swapping a LB for a saftey.
but you may have a point, I also see a lot of 4-2-5 look, which may be better against stopping a potential run but you still have two DEs rushing primarily.
today's defenses are mostly hybrid now anyway.
And now for reality.
The 3-4 was invented because of the lack of DE's capable of being stout enough to play as a down lineman while also being athletic enough to get to the QB. The scheme exists to more easily find players who can rush off the edge.
Playing in a 3-4 made them better run defenders. It didn't make those players better pass rushers than they would have been in 4-3.
In Nickel, 3-4 teams play a 4-man line (4-2-5 Nickel) and those same 3-4 OLBs play DE in Nickel.
Summary: The 3-4 improved run defense by formation instead of by drafting bigger edge players.