The last time Amari or Ceedee had a 100yd game

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
When my niece was murdered by a thug that broke into the wrong apartment, my perspective on life and what's important changed....it just a fricking game!

Sorry about your loss.

Well you see entertainment should have to be actually entertaining.
 

Ranching

Well-Known Member
Messages
42,852
Reaction score
107,131
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Sorry about your loss.

Well you see entertainment should have to be actually entertaining.
I enjoy football.....the ins and outs, the chess match...not really concerned with the outcome. I just like watching it.
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
43,724
Kupp had 1,100 yards and 10 TD’s in 2019. Are you new to football?
Are you dumb?


Amari outproduced him last year with Andy Dalton throwing him the ball. Which is crazy considering he is having a worse year this year with Dak
 

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
5,208
Are you dumb?


Amari outproduced him last year with Andy Dalton throwing him the ball. Which is crazy considering he is having a worse year this year with Dak

Okay. And your question was “when was he great before this season” and I told you. He was great in 2019. What point exactly do you think you’re trying to make?
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
43,724
Okay. And your question was “when was he great before this season” and I told you. He was great in 2019. What point exactly do you think you’re trying to make?
Dummy


Your point was we dont have any receivers as good as Kupp. Before this season, that is a flat out lie. Amari was the better receiver last year by a big margin. With a backup QB.

You are trying to defend the QB not being able to get the WRs the ball so out of desperation, you came up with a crappy take…
 

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
5,208
Dummy


Your point was we dont have any receivers as good as Kupp. Before this season, that is a flat out lie. Amari was the better receiver last year by a big margin. With a backup QB.

You are trying to defend the QB not being able to get the WRs the ball so out of desperation, you came up with a crappy take…

I'll say this slowly and carefully so even you can understand:

Your original point in this thread was whining that "Why dont the Packers or the Rams or the Bucs have problems getting their top WRs the ball??"

My counter was: Kupp and Adams are better than our receivers.

So, since you're having trouble grasping this point, let me ask you: Has Amari ever had as productive a season as Kupp this year? Have any of our receivers?

Now, look at how many times Kupp has been targeted (184) compared to our receivers. Ask yourself if the reason his stats look so gaudy is because of the targets? The Cowboys have three players with over 90 targets - the Rams have one, Kupp.

So, the Rams "don't have problems" getting him the ball because they just hyper-target him. And why do they do that? Either because A.) He's better than everyone else, and good enough to warrant the targets and is constantly open; B.) Everyone else on the Rams sucks and nobody else is open but him; or C.) Their QB isn't good enough to read the rest of the field and go to his second and third options so he forces it to Kupp.

Whichever the answer is, it invalidates all the whining you were doing on the first page about how these teams get their WR's the ball and we don't. The difference statistically is the Cowboys just have more skill players to spread it around to and don't force targets to any one player.
 

Zman5

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,896
Reaction score
20,220
The Bucs won yesterday on a drive where the only two receivers targeted were Cyril Grayson and Tyler Johnson. On that drive Brady went 7 for 9, 93 yards and the game winning TD.

Again the only receivers with a catch (or even targeted) on that drive were Tyler Johnson and Cyril freaking Grayson. I know it was the Jets but really? Let that sink in.


It goes back to what I was saying. What's the big deal about the top 2 WR getting 100 yards? Like you pointed out, TB won with two WR you never heard about. I doubt their fans are crying that their top 2 WR didn't get 100 yards yesterday.
 

WillieBeamen

BoysfanfromNY
Messages
15,174
Reaction score
43,724
I'll say this slowly and carefully so even you can understand:

Your original point in this thread was whining that "Why dont the Packers or the Rams or the Bucs have problems getting their top WRs the ball??"

My counter was: Kupp and Adams are better than our receivers.

So, since you're having trouble grasping this point, let me ask you: Has Amari ever had as productive a season as Kupp this year? Have any of our receivers?

Now, look at how many times Kupp has been targeted (184) compared to our receivers. Ask yourself if the reason his stats look so gaudy is because of the targets? The Cowboys have three players with over 90 targets - the Rams have one, Kupp.

So, the Rams "don't have problems" getting him the ball because they just hyper-target him. And why do they do that? Either because A.) He's better than everyone else, and good enough to warrant the targets and is constantly open; B.) Everyone else on the Rams sucks and nobody else is open but him; or C.) Their QB isn't good enough to read the rest of the field and go to his second and third options so he forces it to Kupp.

Whichever the answer is, it invalidates all the whining you were doing on the first page about how these teams get their WR's the ball and we don't. The difference statistically is the Cowboys just have more skill players to spread it around to and don't force targets to any one player.
Look at this dummy yall


Before this season, you nor anyone else wouldve never uttered Cooper Kupp being a better WR than Amari Cooper. Its hilarious how you had to go back to 2019 to prove a point about his play, when Cooper outperformed him last season with Dalton.


The Rams have a HC/OC/QB that want to get him the ball as hes their best player on offense. Cooper is our best player on offense and this QB/OC havent been able to get him the ball. That is a playcaller and qb problem.


Learn football and stop quoting me clown
 

Pessimist_cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,883
Reaction score
15,233
Look at this dummy yall


Before this season, you nor anyone else wouldve never uttered Cooper Kupp being a better WR than Amari Cooper. Its hilarious how you had to go back to 2019 to prove a point about his play, when Cooper outperformed him last season with Dalton.


The Rams have a HC/OC/QB that want to get him the ball as hes their best player on offense. Cooper is our best player on offense and this QB/OC havent been able to get him the ball. That is a playcaller and qb problem.


Learn football and stop quoting me clown
You are correct. You put Cooper on the Bucs, Bengals, packers he’s a 100 catch 1400 yard WR.
 

DOUBLE WING

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,658
Reaction score
5,208
Look at this dummy yall

Before this season, you nor anyone else wouldve never uttered Cooper Kupp being a better WR than Amari Cooper. Its hilarious how you had to go back to 2019 to prove a point about his play, when Cooper outperformed him last season with Dalton.

Learn football and stop quoting me clown


Cooper Kupp had better numbers in 2019 than Amari Cooper did. Why is it so difficult for your feeble brain to comprehend the idea anyone would have considered Kupp better than Amari at that time?


The Rams have a HC/OC/QB that want to get him the ball as hes their best player on offense. Cooper is our best player on offense and this QB/OC havent been able to get him the ball. That is a playcaller and qb problem.

So what exactly is your contention? That Moore should cut Lamb and Schultz's targets in half and give them all to Amari, so he could have 184 targets too? What exactly would that accomplish? There's no "problem" here - there's a case of one WR getting overloaded with targets on his team, where those targets are split between various players on our team.

Again, I ask, what point is it that you think you're trying to make here?
 
Top