I didn't say Tampa was crap, I said the opener you can't take much away from it. That was his best performance in those 6 games - New Orleans also stomped Green Bay in week 1. Is that indicative to how the Packers played the rest of the year? Who is the most likely to win MVP?
This is such a low standard, that a dude beating up on crap teams is now MVP level.
new england? that was bad? and you said tampa was his best performance? so not Giants or New england games?
and now you are changing the premise of the argument...what I said was that earlier in the year, the first 6 games he was playing at a very high level and was in the MVP discussions....but now you are saying that wasn't who is based on the last 10 games....after the fact...... looking into your crystal ball.
facts are that earlier in the year he was playing at a very high level, you want to say Tampa doesn't count, new england wasn't good early on, but forget about carolina as they ended up bad...your logic is all over the place and you multiple times have contradicted yourself.
and almost all of them played good teams, played bad teams in their first 6 or 7 games.... you play who you have on your schedule and you play crappy teams!? then you beat them up and that's what you are supposed to do. can't diminish the performance.
and by no means am I comparing Dak to any of the QB listed below...so don't even go there, but
Rodgers....laid and egg his first game against the saints, beat detroit, three teams were good...we know washington was a farce...
Burrows played chicago, jacksonville, lions and vikings and they barely beat some of them
Brady played a bad NE team (early in the year as you said, a bad dolphins team and atlanta
and we can go on for all other QBs and it will be similar.
again, there is absolutely no denying that in the first 6 games Dak was playing at a very high level....he did pretty bad the last 9-10 games, but at that point, after new england game you had no idea and expectations were he would continue.