In defense of Stephen in the Gregory negotiation

Motorola

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,424
Reaction score
9,157
Exactly. A lot of fans buy into the FO's bullcrap so much. What was done to Cooper after the season was a smear campaign that worked on a lot of the fanbase. This FO does not care about the fans. I don't know how many more examples there have to be. They are going to it to Zeke next year. We all agree that Zeke has a bad contract and needs to go, but watch the smears against him next year that they will use to justify cutting him when we all know he isn't worth what his cap number is.
Elliott's last known public misstep away from (that I know of) was May 2019 at that Vegas music festival (May 2019).
He played hurt\injured the latter part of this past season. (Coaching should have held him out of some games and let other RBs take up the slack= prove their worth).
Hope Zeke has a stellar last season with the Cowboys that results in a deep playoff run.
 

Acceptablename

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,339
Reaction score
1,566
I see some are blaming him for his 11th hour contract verbiage that lost Gregory to Denver but that is a common negotiating tactic and how can he be faulted for trying to protect the club with a player with a spotty history?

I don't like Stephen but in this case, I will defend what he did, not really knowing what the 11th hour terms were but this team does not have a history with that so it had to be to protect the team.

Most refer to it as the "Columbo Close" and the timing of it is crucial. It is named for his "oh, one more thing" which was the real thing all along. It must be used when the buyer is already amenable to the close, objections have all been addressed and they want to do this.

I had it used against me many times and grew to expect it because it speaks to you are already in agreement and have just about taken ownership, you won't back out now. However, it does not allow for previous options being in place...like Denver with a matching offer on the table. I think that one caught them off guard.

You can bet this wasn't some last minute item they'd forgotten about, this was in the plan all along but it had to be played at the right moment. Do you think it was lost on them than in the last game of his contract year he behaved as he did on the field? His history with a tearful admission that he'd let his Mom down only to repeat that over and over again?

Think shades of Terrell Owens on his best behavior with one year renewable contracts until he got his three year deal. Say hello to the real Owens.

And this is a player that blew a drug test the week of the draft after being considered a top 15 pick. They had ample warning and the media would have been merciless with the cap situation and working it out to keep this guy should he go off the rails again. And something about Gregory made them nervous.

I really think Stephen did the right thing in this instance and if this 11th hour verbiage was behavior related and Gregory balked at that, that's all I need to know. He might be good in Denver but he had already proven what he could be in Dallas.
Right,wrong or indifferent Randy is lead around by his nose. He is dead to me
 

mugsybows

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,496
Reaction score
4,047
FN5zzz6XwAU6xci
Its become very clear all this fool cares about is protecting his inheritance. This team is doomed
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,446
Reaction score
17,844
I see some are blaming him for his 11th hour contract verbiage that lost Gregory to Denver but that is a common negotiating tactic and how can he be faulted for trying to protect the club with a player with a spotty history?

I don't like Stephen but in this case, I will defend what he did, not really knowing what the 11th hour terms were but this team does not have a history with that so it had to be to protect the team.

Most refer to it as the "Columbo Close" and the timing of it is crucial. It is named for his "oh, one more thing" which was the real thing all along. It must be used when the buyer is already amenable to the close, objections have all been addressed and they want to do this.

I had it used against me many times and grew to expect it because it speaks to you are already in agreement and have just about taken ownership, you won't back out now. However, it does not allow for previous options being in place...like Denver with a matching offer on the table. I think that one caught them off guard.

You can bet this wasn't some last minute item they'd forgotten about, this was in the plan all along but it had to be played at the right moment. Do you think it was lost on them than in the last game of his contract year he behaved as he did on the field? His history with a tearful admission that he'd let his Mom down only to repeat that over and over again?

Think shades of Terrell Owens on his best behavior with one year renewable contracts until he got his three year deal. Say hello to the real Owens.

And this is a player that blew a drug test the week of the draft after being considered a top 15 pick. They had ample warning and the media would have been merciless with the cap situation and working it out to keep this guy should he go off the rails again. And something about Gregory made them nervous.

I really think Stephen did the right thing in this instance and if this 11th hour verbiage was behavior related and Gregory balked at that, that's all I need to know. He might be good in Denver but he had already proven what he could be in Dallas.
if Randy was planning to be at his best behaviour and give us his best, then why balk at the clause. my response would have been "you never have to worry about that, thanks for standing by me all these years"...

good luck denver
 

BobSacamano

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,073
Reaction score
1,954
Basically what it comes down to is..,Stephen is cheap AND amoral plus Au revoir Gregory!!!
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,691
Reaction score
12,710
Technically we can't and shouldn't be mad at anyone. Some people do try to do last minute addons like car dealerships, so that is a valid negotiation tactic, but walking away is a valid negotiation tactic as well. You start trying to tack stuff on and I don't like the stuff you tacked on to the deal, I have every right to walk away. RG offered to take less to stay here, but then you start adding other stuff in, and he's not obligated to accept whatever is tossed his way.
 

NumOneQB

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,220
Reaction score
3,602
I mean they could've ASKED/TOLD him about it instead of walking into the room with it added. This is the type thing a car dealer does when you buy a car. Have the out the door deal negotiated then suddenly they come back into the room with new dealer fee's added you've never seen. You don't do business with people like that EITHER!

Agreed. Be up front and not try to shoe horn it in at the last minute. If that’s indeed how it went down, Stephen deserve to be fired………oh wait. Nevermind. Daddy is patting him on the back saying, “it’s ok. We’ll get one even better, Stevie!”
 
Top