It's very tricky. As evident on this board, the impact of a player's money is always questioned while a team makes "business decisions". Taking money EARNED would be a problem in the clause, not money taken still left on the contract as a big decider. It is a business. If Gregory mis-stepped, he wouldn't get any money, as mandated by the NFL. Suspension means no pay. Players always get the "overpaid" label, but never the "underpaid" label. JJ should get over it, after all.......it's a business. Gregory, with the advice of agent, made a decision. There's no loyalty, and the owners know that when they cut/release/restructure. Another team's problem is another team's solution sometimes. Denver proved that.