So what do you mean then? Is Fowler worse?
And 6 sacks was Gregory’s ‘best ever’.
I’m not ‘diverting’ anything. I pointing out the gaping holes in a bad argument. You mentioned that Fowler could be a ‘bonehead’. Your words. I pointed out that Quinn know him FOR YEARS. He knows him, you don’t.
See above.
Point being Gregory got just 6 sacks among a group of good pass rushers. 6 sacks.
[quote{now, it remains to be seen how Fowler will do in Dallas. I hope I am wrong. I will eat crow if I am wrong about him. but at this point, right now, its not an improvement, given cowboys and denver both wanted Gregory. both offered him large contracts. fowler was an after thought when our offer was rejected.
Teams make bad signings every year. We both know that.
Well at least you finished your post being reasonable. I’m good with that.
[/QUOTE]
he is not better than gregory. he maybe the same, so in my mind, we didn't improve the position. and fowler has to learn a new system and play along new players.
Player A had a bunch of sacks few years ago, does it mean he is as good today? fowler had 3, 4.5 sacks las two years. so obviously he needs a lot of help (think Dak) to help him achieve better results as he is not a difference maker, thus making him a JAG.
NFL is not based on what you did in the past, but based on what I think your potential is in the future (which is btw, not the way the cowboys think through things). so obviously cowboys and Broncos thought, Gegory has much higher potential than Fowler. both heavily pursued gregory and both made significant offers.
so fowler, at this juncture of his career is not as good as gregory. that's my opinion. its also opinion of Broncos and Cowboys FOs.