Any Interest In Robert Quinn?

OmerV

OmerV

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,899
Reaction score
22,430
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The Realist said:
He only had 18.5 sacks last year. Don’t know if our FO would be interested.

If it’s up to me I go get him.
Click to expand...
Can't just go get him - he's not a free agent therefore not available, except maybe in a trade, which would be very costly.
 
quickccc

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,118
Reaction score
14,024
Stephen is not gonna trade for and take on that huge contract.
And he'll only do that to his own core players he's had here since they were drafted.
 
quickccc

quickccc

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,118
Reaction score
14,024
gimmesix said:
Dan Quinn's defense is a little different than Marinelli's. Robert Quinn might could fit in a DPR role. But I wouldn't trade for him unless all it takes is a late-round pick. He's been better than the other pass rusher (Dante Fowler) that we picked up.
Click to expand...

isn't it too late now for the Bears to opt out on Quinn's current contract ?
there's a opt out in 2022 opt but what's the deadline for that i wonder.
 
blueblood70

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,421
Reaction score
26,903
The Realist said:
He only had 18.5 sacks last year. Don’t know if our FO would be interested.

If it’s up to me I go get him.
Click to expand...
umm the bears say they aren't interested in trading him(that gm speak unless you want to over pay them with far to high draft picks) and we had him and nooone here appreciate him., they called him one trick pony but sure that lie 3 randy Gregory's LOL

we had our chance let him go fans were happy..smh:rolleyes:o_O
 
blueblood70

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,421
Reaction score
26,903
john van brocklin said:
Agree
Click to expand...
im indifferent but pullllease take that nonsense on 3rd down only guy its what you aid when he left and hes better then RGx3

16.5= RG career number total number of sacks

RQ last year 18.5 career 101

right we all mad RG didn't get signed and then also say no to RQ LMAO this is what tou al would make horrible GMs..
 
Whyjerry

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,001
Reaction score
24,846
The Realist said:
He only had 18.5 sacks last year. Don’t know if our FO would be interested.

If it’s up to me I go get him.
Click to expand...
RQ having 18.5 sacks last year and looking for a job is about the strangest thing I have heard in a long time.

I had to dig. He is still on the Bears. Whew that makes me feel better. I thought I was going crazy.
 
America's Cowboy

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,057
Reaction score
46,536
Flamma said:
No problem. I am also at work and bored so I decided to nitpick because I had nothing better to do. I knew damn well you knew he was a WR. But I'm a toll collector working a midnight shift doing absolutely nothing for most of the night. I just had to point that out because I'm bored!!!
Click to expand...
:laugh::thumbup:

Thanks for the service you provide. :flagwave:
 
blueblood70

blueblood70

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,421
Reaction score
26,903
Whyjerry said:
RQ having 18.5 sacks last year and looking for a job is about the strangest thing I have heard in a long time.

I had to dig. He is still on the Bears. Whew that makes me feel better. I thought I was going crazy.
Click to expand...
on rt bears and bears stated no interest in trade although money and picks could persuade them but this is why the mods let these posts just happen when the guy and his team stated HES NOT AVAILABLE but hey its rumor city in here ..fake made up rumors with no validity whatsoever.

Those saying no to RQ still calling him a one trick pony are living in denial land.

the guy had a year last year at what age? that RG hasnt matched his entire career combined..lmao. upset we lost RGs 6 career high sacks but not to guy who had 18.5 in one season and 101 for his career. IMO should have kept him..was worth it, rush specialist ONLY or not better then anyone on our roster as pure pas Rush DE..ill take that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top