The QB Quandary

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
36,298
Reaction score
16,894
the team with the worse qb and worse qb performance won.

happened again the next week with Roger’s in GB.

what does that teach you?

That we sucked in the playoffs while a worse QB and his RBs roughed us up beat us so bad that we tyried a QB run to end the game.
But I am happy that you bask in the fact that Dak was better than Garropolo.
 

VaqueroTD

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,969
Reaction score
16,316
Pretty easy solution. Just like any QB, Dak is at his best when he has solid blockers up front and a strong running game.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
That we sucked in the playoffs while a worse QB and his RBs roughed us up beat us so bad that we tyried a QB run to end the game.
But I am happy that you bask in the fact that Dak was better than Garropolo.

Wrong..........it means that the team that surrounds the QB with the best team often wins.

QB is only a small part of it. When you have Garrappolo beating a Dak team and a Rogers team on the road both times, it should be obvious. Even to you mate!
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,045
Reaction score
6,665
Wrong..........it means that the team that surrounds the QB with the best team often wins.

QB is only a small part of it. When you have Garrappolo beating a Dak team and a Rogers team on the road both times, it should be obvious. Even to you mate!
Or it could mean that and Garrapolo is better than what he’s been given credit for, but SF management doesn’t think he’s good enough to bring home a SB trophy. I don’t think any team thinks QB is a small part of it, otherwise they wouldn’t be the highest paid players in the league. Garrapolo did help beat the Rams on LA to make the playoffs and then help the team get to the NFC championship game as a wildcard. He may not be your shiny model but he has done enough and not made enough mistakes to win.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Or it could mean that and Garrapolo is better than what he’s been given credit for, but SF management doesn’t think he’s good enough to bring home a SB trophy. I don’t think any team thinks QB is a small part of it, otherwise they wouldn’t be the highest paid players in the league. Garrapolo did help beat the Rams on LA to make the playoffs and then help the team get to the NFC championship game as a wildcard. He may not be your shiny model but he has done enough and not made enough mistakes to win.

Could mean or does mean? Arent you capable of making your own analysis? Mine agrees exactly with his what his own teams feels. Not good enough.

Maybe you dont watch Garappolo enough. Its very obvious.

Not made enough mistakes to win? Doesn't sound like the QB I want.
 

nobody

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,396
Reaction score
18,489
He needs a better OL....that's all. He has the goods, just needs time to go through his progressions.

I'd say that he also needs a better Offensive coordinator that molds the offense around what Dak can do and not try to fit a square peg into a round hole. Moore absolutely failed to adjust the playbook for a struggling O-line and struggling Dak. That's inexcusable and reeks of Garrett.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,045
Reaction score
6,665
Could mean or does mean? Arent you capable of making your own analysis? Mine agrees exactly with his what his own teams feels. Not good enough.

Maybe you dont watch Garappolo enough. Its very obvious.

Not made enough mistakes to win? Doesn't sound like the QB I want.
I don't watch him enough to know. I just know that when the games have been on the line and in the playoffs, he's played well enough to win. So far, that's been a lot better than Dak has been. What makes you think Dak is so much better? More quantitative stats? Look at Aikman's stats in the playoffs. His weren't high on average. They were mostly just minimal but he made the plays when it mattered.

You may think it's due to just the team being much better around him. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I see nothing to suggest one way or the other. He did it three times in a row against the highest level of competition (except maybe the Cowboys and Dak).
 

ondaedg

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,891
Reaction score
3,034
Or it could mean that and Garrapolo is better than what he’s been given credit for, but SF management doesn’t think he’s good enough to bring home a SB trophy. I don’t think any team thinks QB is a small part of it, otherwise they wouldn’t be the highest paid players in the league. Garrapolo did help beat the Rams on LA to make the playoffs and then help the team get to the NFC championship game as a wildcard. He may not be your shiny model but he has done enough and not made enough mistakes to win.

The Rams just won a super bowl with a qb that led the league in INTs and pick-sixes. Maybe it had to do with the fact they had other all-pros on the team?
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,045
Reaction score
6,665
The Rams just won a super bowl with a qb that led the league in INTs and pick-sixes. Maybe it had to do with the fact they had other all-pros on the team?
Not sure what this non-sequitur has to do with anything I said. Yeah, everyone knows good teams win SBs.
 
Top