I Would Take A Tight End. Before Taking A Wide Receiver

Vinnie2u

Well-Known Member

Messages

7,750

Reaction score

11,150

• Apr 29, 2022

• #1

I think its a bigger need.. We got slim pickings behind Shultz..

 

quickccc

Well-Known Member

Messages

16,118

Reaction score

14,024

• Apr 29, 2022

• #2

player value.

i'm Not for taking taking a TE, just for the sake of taking one.
He'd have to be special and worth taking over a valued WR.

 

The Realist

Well-Known Member

Messages

5,504

Reaction score

2,027

• Apr 29, 2022

• #3

I would take Pickens, Watson and Tolbert before TE but after that TE better than the WR’s.

 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member

Messages

10,974

Reaction score

9,144

• Apr 29, 2022

• #4

A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid.

 

RodeoJake

Well-Known Member

Messages

3,882

Reaction score

6,843

• Apr 29, 2022

• #5

I'd take a TE in the 3rd, if we're using a 3rd we get in trade for Schultz.

 

JPM

Well-Known Member

Messages

6,260

Reaction score

1,131

• Apr 29, 2022

• #6

I'm hoping for a DT in round 2.

 

Dalmations202

Well-Known Member

Messages

1,366

Reaction score

873

• Apr 29, 2022

• #7

cnuball21 said:

A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid.

Click to expand...

I really dislike agreeing with you but you are correct here IMO.

DT, DE, LB, even OG so TSmith can focus on OT would be a better option than TE in the second, and I am a huge advocate of a better TE.

I am hoping DT.