CFZ Who else would you have taken?

Parcells4Life

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,496
Reaction score
9,345
This isn't even the point the point is that they didn't do anything all offseason saying oh well there's still the draft and then they fail to get any real day 1 game changers in the draft.
There weren’t many day 1 game changers available this year in the draft and certainly not at 24. Yes the FA period was really bad. I’m starting to understand why they cut/let go who they did.

The key to the whole season ultimately comes down to which version of Dak is there in 2022? First half MVP or second half reincarnation of 2018?
 

cowboysdoomsday

Active Member
Messages
159
Reaction score
171
Linderbaum. Travis Jones. And the linebacker dean out of Georgia. Cowboys should have nabbed either Travis Jones or dean in the 2nd.

Linderbaum would have been an immediate day one starter to solidify the middle of the line.

The ravens are one of the very best at acquiring talent through the draft. It's no surprise they nabbed two of the guys that fell in the cowboys lap.

I think Dallas pre determines who they are going to draft and if a better prospect falls they ignore them completely. They talk themselves into a player and won't budge if the circumstances change.
 

Acceptablename

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,339
Reaction score
1,566
I think they made the correct picks.

I was a big fan of Travis Jones and the TE Otton; however, Sam Williams is a perfect fit in the Dan Quinn defense and they would have needed to trade into round 3 to get Otton.
That Jones fall to 76 is a head scratcher
 

Acceptablename

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,339
Reaction score
1,566
Linderbaum. Travis Jones. And the linebacker dean out of Georgia. Cowboys should have nabbed either Travis Jones or dean in the 2nd.

Linderbaum would have been an immediate day one starter to solidify the middle of the line.

The ravens are one of the very best at acquiring talent through the draft. It's no surprise they nabbed two of the guys that fell in the cowboys lap.

I think Dallas pre determines who they are going to draft and if a better prospect falls they ignore them completely. They talk themselves into a player and won't budge if the circumstances change.
Rumors of Dean’s injuries may have made Dallas wait. But Travis Jones fall to 76 somehow?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

Jfconrow

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
682
I think they wanted that RB Pierre strong in the 4th, but the Pats took him two picks before so they went with the TE Ferguson. I also wanted to trade up in the 2nd for Kenneth Walker3, but I’m happier with Williams and the LB Tolbert. I guess Dallas 3rd RB will be an UDFA this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

Verdict

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,002
Reaction score
20,199
Hindsight is always 20/20, and I don't dislike the players we got at all.
I do believe our biggest need was interior OL, and obviously Edge and WR became needs during the offseason and were addressed.
Smith has tremendous upside (but also needs so much work to be nfl ready). His penalties concern me. Watching tape he really throws guys around with his arms/hands, and I feel he won't be able to get away with that in the NFL. I actually liked him as a potential 2nd rounder but figured he would be gone sooner. His upside is tremendous however, so I get the pick.

My idea was to get Linderbaum if he was there, then look at other power guys later. I like Smith as I mentioned, but know he wasn't going to be there in the 2nd. A guy I liked a lot was Sean Ryann. The Pack got him at 92.
I personally would have loved Linderbaum and Ryann. They remind me so much of TFred and Zach.
I also like Faalele and Kinnard, who went in the 4th and 5th rounds. Feel they could start as swing T then maybe start down the road (though both are likely RT, and we have Steele there)
So I would have loved to get Linderbaum in the 1st, Ryann in the 3rd, then moved up and got Kinnard in the 5th.
I like the Ferguson pick in the 4th. I was hoping for him of Charlie Kolar there.

I was surprised Perrion Winfrey lasted until the 4th, but I like Sam Williams as well, so not unhappy by any means.
I would say my main regret is that we unneccassarily created needs at Edge and WR, which we had to address on Day 2.
I would have personally preferred we kept Coop and Gregory and addressed our main needs, which IMO were the trenches on both siides of the ball.
I think the organization has earned the right on the draft to be trusted. FA on the other hand, is a seperate issue.
I don’t think Linderbaum is like Frederick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

Jarntt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,340
Reaction score
5,867
I'm fine with Smith, but if it were me I would have taken Lloyd or Wyatt (unless they removed him from their draft board due to off the field stuff) in the first. My other top choice was Linderbaum. I also would have traded up for Dean in the 3rd unless of course we took Lloyd. A lot of teams traded up for picks and I think the cost was a little lower this year than normal and the benefit was there in the form of better players for the teams that did it
 

Robster8989

Well-Known Member
Messages
399
Reaction score
499
Linderbaum. Travis Jones. And the linebacker dean out of Georgia. Cowboys should have nabbed either Travis Jones or dean in the 2nd.

Linderbaum would have been an immediate day one starter to solidify the middle of the line.

The ravens are one of the very best at acquiring talent through the draft. It's no surprise they nabbed two of the guys that fell in the cowboys lap.

I think Dallas pre determines who they are going to draft and if a better prospect falls they ignore them completely. They talk themselves into a player and won't budge if the circumstances change.

Can you believe the draft the Ravens had?
Incredible, on paper at least.
I know they traded a productive (but unhappy) WR to get the 2nd First rounder, but man.
Several talent evaluators had Hamilton at the very top of the draft, then to get Linderbaum as well, who was top 10 in many evals.
They nabbed Ojabi in the 2nd, and Jones in the 3rd. (A few evaluations had them both as late first rounders).
They had 4 4ths, one of whome was near 400LB T Daniel Faalele. Another was a really big, TE, who can block and catch, Charlie Kolar, both of whom were on my radar for the Boys.

I'm happy with our draft given our needs. If I was GM and had a do over, I would have kept Cooper and Gregory. Both are really good players at key positions, and keeping them would have solidified those positions to the point that we were set, pre draft. I also would have signed Wagner.
I would have then taken:
1. Linderbaum
2. Jones
3. Ryann
4. Ferguson (or Kolar)
5. Kinnard
I just think trenches were our obvious weakness last year, so my investment would have gone there.
A starting C and LG, swing T, TE who will play and a stud DT.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,955
Can you believe the draft the Ravens had?
Incredible, on paper at least.
I know they traded a productive (but unhappy) WR to get the 2nd First rounder, but man.
Several talent evaluators had Hamilton at the very top of the draft, then to get Linderbaum as well, who was top 10 in many evals.
They nabbed Ojabi in the 2nd, and Jones in the 3rd. (A few evaluations had them both as late first rounders).
They had 4 4ths, one of whome was near 400LB T Daniel Faalele. Another was a really big, TE, who can block and catch, Charlie Kolar, both of whom were on my radar for the Boys.

I'm happy with our draft given our needs. If I was GM and had a do over, I would have kept Cooper and Gregory. Both are really good players at key positions, and keeping them would have solidified those positions to the point that we were set, pre draft. I also would have signed Wagner.
I would have then taken:
1. Linderbaum
2. Jones
3. Ryann
4. Ferguson (or Kolar)
5. Kinnard
I just think trenches were our obvious weakness last year, so my investment would have gone there.
A starting C and LG, swing T, TE who will play and a stud DT.
I always love the Baltimore draft.....but for some reason they have not turned those picks into success. If you go back to 2012 (superbowl with Lewis/Reed)...2013-2021 they have 1 playoff win, missing the playoffs 4 times. The Cowboys have 2 wins, missing the playoffs 5 times. Is it Harbaugh??
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

AyeAtey

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,682
Rd 1: Johnson, DE
Rd 2: Travis Jones, DT
Rd 3: Sean Ryann, LOG
Rd 4: Faalele, swing OT
Your Rd 3 pick would've been nice also. Let's see who mans that position within the current roster, good luck to him.

Hope WR Tolbert if he plays justifies the pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT

BAT

Mr. Fixit
Messages
19,443
Reaction score
15,607
I think they wanted that RB Pierre strong in the 4th, but the Pats took him two picks before so they went with the TE Ferguson. I also wanted to trade up in the 2nd for Kenneth Walker3, but I’m happier with Williams and the LB Tolbert. I guess Dallas 3rd RB will be an UDFA this year.

I really liked Strong too and was praying he'd fall to the 5th.

Alas...
 

McKDaddy

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,321
Reaction score
8,574
I always love the Baltimore draft.....but for some reason they have not turned those picks into success. If you go back to 2012 (superbowl with Lewis/Reed)...2013-2021 they have 1 playoff win, missing the playoffs 4 times. The Cowboys have 2 wins, missing the playoffs 5 times. Is it Harbaugh??

They clearly understand how to evaluate and acquire core talent. I would disagree somewhat about their success but acknowledge they haven't had the ultimate success. Largely though, I think you could explain a lot of their issues with 1) good QB's not great QB's 2) playing in a physical division & 3) playing in the AFC. That period has seen some strong AFC teams battling to get thru the playoffs. Overall, I would take their approach & management over ours every day.
 

Jake

Beyond tired of Jerry
Messages
36,067
Reaction score
84,350
he rips us...but he mocked Smith to the cowboys. how does that make sense.

If his mock is who he thinks that team will take it makes sense. It doesn't necessarily mean he thinks they should.

He's been doing this a long time and the Cowboys have had the same FO for decades, and he called it.
 

DBOY3141

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,340
Reaction score
5,955
They clearly understand how to evaluate and acquire core talent. I would disagree somewhat about their success but acknowledge they haven't had the ultimate success. Largely though, I think you could explain a lot of their issues with 1) good QB's not great QB's 2) playing in a physical division & 3) playing in the AFC. That period has seen some strong AFC teams battling to get thru the playoffs. Overall, I would take their approach & management over ours every day.
For most of that time they had Flacco/Jackson...we had Romo/Dak. Probably equal there. There division during that time, had Pitts. Clev/Cincy were total garbage, just like Wash./NYG. Again...probably equal, even though Philly from our division won a SB during that time. AFC over NFC...you could give an edge to AFC.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,979
Reaction score
7,706
Given the situation the front office put the team in, the draft seems sensible and reasonable. Just a shame a few players weren't resigned so they could have addressed other needs to improve the team.
 

CouchCoach

Staff member
Messages
41,122
Reaction score
74,901
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I would have gone for Johnson as the 3rd best, 2nd according to some, pass rusher on the board but I understand the Smith pick. He's an immediate replacement for the LG and eventually LT. That could be an excellent pick. And he would not have been there with their next pick, they would have had to trade back up and lose draft capital and they had too many needs.

I really have no issue with their draft. They stayed put and let it come to them and filled the needs based on whether the player would be available to them in a subsequent pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAT
Top