Diggs: sacks are easier than interceptions

Hawkeye0202 · May 8, 2022

Agree or not

ThatJerryKid · May 8, 2022

Hawkeye0202 said:
Agree or not

Agree.

Hawkeye0202 · May 8, 2022

jrumann59 · May 8, 2022

I would disagree I think both are difficult and really on many things. Maybe INTs because if they don't throw to your guy the odds go way down that you will get an INT

Hawkeye0202 · May 8, 2022

Think it is time to admit this kid is the real deal........

CATCH17 · May 8, 2022

Of course INTs are more difficult than interceptions to get. Why do I see this dumb topic continue to get discuessed?

baltcowboy · May 8, 2022

Diggs is the most underrated player on the Cowboys. Some idiot fans want to trade him next offseason so they won’t have to pay him.

HungryLion · May 8, 2022

Sure. Just look at sack records by some of the best pass rushers ever compared to Int records
For some of the best CB’s and safeties ever.

It makes the answer obvious.

Runwildboys · May 8, 2022

Sacks are easier for Parsons, but I bet interceptions are easier for Diggs. It depends on your skill set.

Cowpolk · May 8, 2022

Hawkeye0202 said:
Think it is time to admit this kid is the real deal........

I did that half way through last season

JBS · May 8, 2022

CATCH17 said:
Of course INTs are more difficult than interceptions to get. Why do I see this dumb topic continue to get discuessed?

Stole my post

JBS · May 8, 2022

What a stupid question lololl

Runwildboys · May 8, 2022

CATCH17 said:
Of course INTs are more difficult than interceptions to get. Why do I see this dumb topic continue to get discuessed?

And BLTs are better than bacon, lettuce, and tomato sandwiches!

Red Dragon · May 8, 2022

Of course they're easier. The sack record is 23 sacks in a season. The INT record is 14.

A double-digit sacker happens every year, multiple such sackers. A double-digit INT season happens only once a decade.

conner01 · May 8, 2022

CATCH17 said:
Of course INTs are more difficult than interceptions to get. Why do I see this dumb topic continue to get discuessed?

There are many more sacks than ints every year
Seems like it’s pretty obvious

JBS · May 8, 2022

Do you guys think it’s easier to get receptions or touchdowns ?

CWR · May 8, 2022

100%. At the least you get more opportunities. INTs require a target.

Jarntt · May 8, 2022

Of course sacks are easier. That’s why sack leaders have more sacks than interception leaders every year. Cowboys led the NFL with 26 sacks in 17 games. TJ Watt had 22.5 sacks all by himself in only 15 games. His team had 55 sacks.

Ranching · May 8, 2022

CATCH17 said:
Of course INTs are more difficult than interceptions to get. Why do I see this dumb topic continue to get discuessed?

Discuessed? Yeah, that's pretty dumb.

J817 · May 8, 2022

jrumann59 said:
I would disagree I think both are difficult and really on many things. Maybe INTs because if they don't throw to your guy the odds go way down that you will get an INT

Right, because multiple players have had 22.5 sacks in a season. Can u foresee a player ever getting 22 or 23 interceptions in season?

Diggs: sacks are easier than interceptions

Well-Known Member

cowboys31

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

1st Round Pick

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Confused about stuff

Landry Hat

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Confused about stuff

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member