Twitter: You think Dak's contract is bad?

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,188
Reaction score
42,948
Should have offered him 5 years 100 million. If he didn't accept, apply either the First round tender or non exclusive tagged him. Dallas paid him close to 100 million more than they should have for the same length of service.
Yep they misplayed the situation
Amateurs negotiating with professional agents
It's what you get running a billion dollar enterprise
Iike it's a mom and pop grocery store.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,889
Reaction score
25,808
Yep, it's why I wished they could have signed dak to a long term deal.
But dak was smart to hold out for a shorter deal.
It’s business for players too
I wished we had signed him the year earlier because it would have been cheaper but I get wanting to see more at the price a QB costs
In a short time we have to decide on an extension or not and that’s a huge decision as well as expensive
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
7,693
Tyron Smith is someone to be respected. He could have got paid a whole lot more but took on a long term contract which was proportionately in everyone's best interests. Similar to Mahomes.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
7,693
I updated the post post your response, but every player in the league knows that Jerry pays who he wants to pay.
True. I agree yet some are happy to still earn a ridiculous amount of money without wanting even more.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,188
Reaction score
42,948
It’s business for players too
I wished we had signed him the year earlier because it would have been cheaper but I get wanting to see more at the price a QB costs
In a short time we have to decide on an extension or not and that’s a huge decision as well as expensive
I understand wanting to see more of dak before committing long term.
But we put ourselves in a position without much leverage.
The short deal was a result.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
19,558
Reaction score
22,447
Tyron Smith is someone to be respected. He could have got paid a whole lot more but took on a long term contract which was proportionately in everyone's best interests. Similar to Mahomes.
Huge contract, term was so team friendly.
Most do not understand that Tyrons contract enabled so much flexability with the cap.
Was like the First bank of Tyron for this franchise.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
7,693
Josh Allen - 6 year extension $150 million guaranteed
Dak Prescott - 4 year extension $126 million guaranteed

An inferior QB on a shorter term deal = less team friendly with more money guaranteed pro rata. Only the Cowboys :facepalm:
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
7,693
Huge contract, term was so team friendly.
Most do not understand that Tyrons contract enabled so much flexability with the cap.
Was like the First bank of Tyron for this franchise.
Patriots were the ultimate example. Not just Brady but so many good players took a little less in order to construct and maintain a stronger roster to regularly challenge for Superbowls. That's not just a dig at Prescott as plenty of others do it - look at the likes of Rodgers who didn't take a concession (although he's worth the big bucks) and the roster wasn't built to last the play offs. People bang on about him being a choker but in reality the roster wasn't good enough - it lacked depth in the play offs when injuries kicked in.

Brady threw a pick 6 vs the Falcons and went down 100 points in the Superbowl yet whilst he gets the plaudits (rightly so) his D kept giving him the ball back admittedly with a little help from some brainless play calling by Shanahan. Yet you could say Brady reaped what he sowed because he had those guys on D like Hightower with the huge play strip sacking Ryan because he took less money.
 

plymkr

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,337
Reaction score
13,860
The problem with Daks contract isn't the AAV, it's the length. The Cowboys never really get a chance to get ahead of the cap number because Daks deal is up again in two years.

Hurtz probably sees a similar situation where he can cash in, but the Eagles dont want to commit for a monster length deal like Mahomes. With Mahomes deal though the Chiefs can manipulate the cap number to do quite a bit as they have a decade of creative accounting to work with.
I agree. The bad news is what you stated. The good news about the length of the deal is if he flames out then we're not stuck with him. In 2 or 3 years we will have no doubt what Dak can and can't do in this league and then adjust accordingly. If we signed him to a Mahomes type deal and he flamed out we'd have some problems.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
74,169
Reaction score
69,130
I actually like Hurts as a person. Seems to be a good kid. Reminds me of Dak a little bit. His problem is no matter what he does he will always be limited as a thrower because he runs the ball better then he throws. Hurts is Lamar Jackson without the 4.2 speed. In the end being such a good running quarterback limits the passing game.
He also doesn't have Lamar's arm either. I too like the guy. Wish he wasn't a Eagle. Seems too good for them but yeah I've seen some bad things from him as a passer....to the point I don't think he can develop better passing ability. Maybe with repetition things will change but man it was rough at times watching him.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,800
Reaction score
18,666
That reporter is kind of an Eagles homer. So he thinks everything will be positive. He predicted the Eagles would win 11-12 games last year. So it's not surprising that he thinks Hurts will be so awesome that he'll get a big contract extension.

What I find comical is that he thinks it will be a good thing for the Eagles. It's a good thing for Jalen Hurts, not the Eagles. What's delusional is thinking he'll get that contract.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,216
Reaction score
95,781
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Eagles fans are saying the same thing. They are joyous Dallas is tied to Prescott. BC mediocre is all he will ever be.

I doubt that since Dak has a great record against the NFCE.
Want to try again?
Hate away.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,800
Reaction score
18,666
Patriots were the ultimate example. Not just Brady but so many good players took a little less in order to construct and maintain a stronger roster to regularly challenge for Superbowls. That's not just a dig at Prescott as plenty of others do it - look at the likes of Rodgers who didn't take a concession (although he's worth the big bucks) and the roster wasn't built to last the play offs. People bang on about him being a choker but in reality the roster wasn't good enough - it lacked depth in the play offs when injuries kicked in.

Brady threw a pick 6 vs the Falcons and went down 100 points in the Superbowl yet whilst he gets the plaudits (rightly so) his D kept giving him the ball back admittedly with a little help from some brainless play calling by Shanahan. Yet you could say Brady reaped what he sowed because he had those guys on D like Hightower with the huge play strip sacking Ryan because he took less money.

Good point about the Packers. The 2019 season was the perfect example. Rodgers and Garoppolo are miles apart, yet the Packers got rolled by the 49ers. That 49ers roster was better by far.
 
Top