News: ESPN: Source: Browns QB Watson suspended 6 games

AyeAtey

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,682
Got off light.

Something's not right. Never have really, recently. NFL needs a big shakeup.
 

Gemini Dolly

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,388
Reaction score
1,396
I thought for sure he'd get at least double of Zeke's suspension.

Make it make sense.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,578
Reaction score
9,783
I could definitely be wrong about this, but doesn't "forcing women into sexual acts" fall under the definition of rape? Perhaps the legal definition varies from the dictionary. Of course allegations are not the same as something definitively happening.

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/03/26/deshaun-watson-tony-buzbee-lawsuits-summary
the facts state differently.... seriously.... go check out the link I provided 2 or 3 weeks ago... dont know where it is right now. It is in the thread where we were discussing this. Mike Florio did the absolute best job of explaining this whole thing. IM not taking the time to do it again for those of you that werent talking about this weeks ago. But again, go check out the youtube video on Florio... his is the best.
 

aikemirv

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,211
Reaction score
9,713
what you are seeing today is a result of what happened with Zeke. This is hilarious.

Rice gets punished and nothing... then video comes out and he is essentially kicked out of the league.

Zeke gets a ridiculous punishment... so everyone screams that Roger should be removed from the process.

Roger is removed from the process, a mutually agreed upon arbitrator is tasked with dealing with the case. Arbitrator hands down a ruling that people dont like, and this is no th e worst thing to happen since the atomic bomb was dropped and this can not be allowed to stand.

This is why a process called "Voir Dire," is what decides 99% of cases before the case even begins.

People scream "Justice was not served,"... only when a verdict they dont like is reached. Nah, Justice is always served when a case has gone to trial and a jury reaches a verdict. It as good as we got.

Thanks for the post. So they agreed to a change after/since the Zeke incident? If so, I don't think it is enough of a suspension but I understand the process at least!
 

Motorola

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,424
Reaction score
9,158
This situation will end up costing Watson 22 games and millions of dollars, along with endorsement deals. He won’t likely get any TV work after football. He’s paying a heavy price.
Watson's banking $190 - $200 million at least (taxes and whatnot will reduce the overall payday) RIGHT NOW.
If he takes care of the money (invest well, avoid scams etc.) - do you really think he will be concerned about working at all ....much less a gig on a sports show / network after he hangs up the shoulder pads for good?
 

Robbieac

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
3,435
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
You guys do realize he was, in all effects, suspended last season right? So it's essentially a 23 game suspension at this point......
 

sunalsorises

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,894
Reaction score
4,600
You guys do realize he was, in all effects, suspended last season right? So it's essentially a 23 game suspension at this point......

He wasn't suspended last year. He got his full salary and could have played at any point in the season. Houston chose not to play him and essentially paid him to go away. I only mention this because I don't think last year has any bearing on the length of his actual suspension.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,578
Reaction score
9,783
You guys do realize he was, in all effects, suspended last season right? So it's essentially a 23 game suspension at this point......
He wasn't suspended last year....he refused to play for the texans......bahahaha
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,925
Reaction score
17,685
ok CReeper... my words should not have went at yiu like that... they are really from weeks of people that dont use factual info to make comments.

So, Ill ask you this. Do you understand exactly what the CBA says and the parts of the CBA that specifically apply to the case involving Watson? I dont remember exactly what it says, but I did read it before.
Do you understand exactly how the arbitration process works?
Do you understand that the arbitrator can only use actual evidence presented at the hearing? Meaning, the NFL interviewed 12 woman, out of the 12, they only felt 4 were credible enough to present their stories to the arbitrator.... meaning that as far as this process is concerned, there are only 4 accusers, not 24. The fact he settled any case is irrelevant to the arbitration case.

I was in the union when I worked at UPS, I was the head of my teachers union for 6 years at my prior school. People say these arent legal proceedings, and while that is true, you need to understand that the whole process is very much like a legal proceeding in that they have a contract with rules to follow. You cant just say well this is what I think, or this is what happened before.. no, you follow the procedure that has been agreed upon.

This is why so many people cant understand, wont understand, or are not capable of understanding this process. They keep throwing out 24 accusers... NO< THERE IS ONLY 4 as far as this proceeding is concerned and people just can not get over this FACT.

I understand your point of view. There is, in fact, written guidelines that the NFL uses to decide on various punishments for various infractions. However, the commissioner can deviate from those guidelines at his discretion as he did with Zeke and La'el Collins. Collins got 5 games last year when the guidelines called for less, or none, depending on the interpretation of Collins' exact infraction.

Goodell has the power to enact whatever punishment he feels is appropriate for the good of the league. If Goodell wanted an indefinite suspension he could have imposed that on Watson.

As for my comment on Goodell being biased against the Cowboys, this latest report only adds to my long list of issues with how Goodell has dealt with the Cowboys starting from the imposition of a CAP penalty against them the year they supposedly violated the CAP the year the CBA expired and basically, there was no formal CAP. It was reported here in the NY area that Goodell got the idea to penalize the Cowboys from the Maras, Giants owners, on that incident.

The Zeke suspension and how it came to that is another story on my list. In that case the NFL's own lead investigator recommended no suspension for Zeke because she did not believe the accuser was credible, the same conclusion the police came to. Not only did Goodell ignore the conclusion of his own lead investigator, he kept her out of the final meeting to decide on what Zeke's punishment should be.

The La'el Collins suspension is also interesting because Collins never failed a single drug test. Yes, he missed several but according to Collins they were excused absences. At the end of the day Collins felt he did not deserve a suspension and the guidelines recommended no suspension. Then this story about bribing the arbitrator came out after Collins' suspension was announced. When information like this is leaked, it is coming from the NFL offices and it may or may not be true.

I am not saying Zeke and Collins were angels, only that the NFL is inconsistent with how they deal with violations of policy and I have yet to see the slap any Cowboys on the wrist.

And btw, it is not just the Cowboys. The league is definitely doing the same or worse to the Commanders.
 

Motorola

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,424
Reaction score
9,158
By comparison, lots of guys got equal or worse suspensions for far fewer incidents/allegations
BREAKING NEWS:
Battery case involving Saints player Alvin Kamara, Chiefs players Chris Lammons, Percy Harris, and Darrin Young delayed 60 days.
 

Reid1boys

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,578
Reaction score
9,783
I understand your point of view. There is, in fact, written guidelines that the NFL uses to decide on various punishments for various infractions. However, the commissioner can deviate from those guidelines at his discretion as he did with Zeke and La'el Collins. Collins got 5 games last year when the guidelines called for less, or none, depending on the interpretation of Collins' exact infraction.

Goodell has the power to enact whatever punishment he feels is appropriate for the good of the league. If Goodell wanted an indefinite suspension he could have imposed that on Watson.

As for my comment on Goodell being biased against the Cowboys, this latest report only adds to my long list of issues with how Goodell has dealt with the Cowboys starting from the imposition of a CAP penalty against them the year they supposedly violated the CAP the year the CBA expired and basically, there was no formal CAP. It was reported here in the NY area that Goodell got the idea to penalize the Cowboys from the Maras, Giants owners, on that incident.

The Zeke suspension and how it came to that is another story on my list. In that case the NFL's own lead investigator recommended no suspension for Zeke because she did not believe the accuser was credible, the same conclusion the police came to. Not only did Goodell ignore the conclusion of his own lead investigator, he kept her out of the final meeting to decide on what Zeke's punishment should be.

The La'el Collins suspension is also interesting because Collins never failed a single drug test. Yes, he missed several but according to Collins they were excused absences. At the end of the day Collins felt he did not deserve a suspension and the guidelines recommended no suspension. Then this story about bribing the arbitrator came out after Collins' suspension was announced. When information like this is leaked, it is coming from the NFL offices and it may or may not be true.

I am not saying Zeke and Collins were angels, only that the NFL is inconsistent with how they deal with violations of policy and I have yet to see the slap any Cowboys on the wrist.

And btw, it is not just the Cowboys. The league is definitely doing the same or worse to the Commanders.

No offense, but I will not consider anything you said in regards to
I understand your point of view. There is, in fact, written guidelines that the NFL uses to decide on various punishments for various infractions. However, the commissioner can deviate from those guidelines at his discretion as he did with Zeke and La'el Collins. Collins got 5 games last year when the guidelines called for less, or none, depending on the interpretation of Collins' exact infraction.

Goodell has the power to enact whatever punishment he feels is appropriate for the good of the league. If Goodell wanted an indefinite suspension he could have imposed that on Watson.

As for my comment on Goodell being biased against the Cowboys, this latest report only adds to my long list of issues with how Goodell has dealt with the Cowboys starting from the imposition of a CAP penalty against them the year they supposedly violated the CAP the year the CBA expired and basically, there was no formal CAP. It was reported here in the NY area that Goodell got the idea to penalize the Cowboys from the Maras, Giants owners, on that incident.

The Zeke suspension and how it came to that is another story on my list. In that case the NFL's own lead investigator recommended no suspension for Zeke because she did not believe the accuser was credible, the same conclusion the police came to. Not only did Goodell ignore the conclusion of his own lead investigator, he kept her out of the final meeting to decide on what Zeke's punishment should be.

The La'el Collins suspension is also interesting because Collins never failed a single drug test. Yes, he missed several but according to Collins they were excused absences. At the end of the day Collins felt he did not deserve a suspension and the guidelines recommended no suspension. Then this story about bribing the arbitrator came out after Collins' suspension was announced. When information like this is leaked, it is coming from the NFL offices and it may or may not be true.

I am not saying Zeke and Collins were angels, only that the NFL is inconsistent with how they deal with violations of policy and I have yet to see the slap any Cowboys on the wrist.

And btw, it is not just the Cowboys. The league is definitely doing the same or worse to the Commanders.

I'll disregard anything you said about any other player.... simply because there is a NEW system in place. So anything done in the past. Is irrelevant.
 

Motorola

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,424
Reaction score
9,158
You guys do realize he was, in all effects, suspended last season right? So it's essentially a 23 game suspension at this point......
As far as playing the sport - Watson was suspended.
But he was paid the his contracted 2021 salary by the Texans.
 

Creeper

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,925
Reaction score
17,685
No offense, but I will not consider anything you said in regards to


I'll disregard anything you said about any other player.... simply because there is a NEW system in place. So anything done in the past. Is irrelevant.

The issue is not what the new or old guidelines say, it is the commissioner deviating from them. New guidelines do not absolve the commissioner of pass actions which demonstrate bias.
 

KJJ

You Have an Axe to Grind
Messages
56,926
Reaction score
35,036
Watson's banking $190 - $200 million at least (taxes and whatnot will reduce the overall payday) RIGHT NOW.
If he takes care of the money (invest well, avoid scams etc.) - do you really think he will be concerned about working at all ....much less a gig on a sports show / network after he hangs up the shoulder pads for good?

I’m sure he’s concerned about his reputation regardless the amount of money he has. Something like this could hurt his Hall of Fame chances.
 

AyeAtey

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,776
Reaction score
1,682
Watson's banking $190 - $200 million at least (taxes and whatnot will reduce the overall payday) RIGHT NOW.
If he takes care of the money (invest well, avoid scams etc.) - do you really think he will be concerned about working at all ....much less a gig on a sports show / network after he hangs up the shoulder pads for good?
Those gardening tools (hoes) aren't cheap.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,900
Reaction score
6,805
the facts state differently.... seriously.... go check out the link I provided 2 or 3 weeks ago... dont know where it is right now. It is in the thread where we were discussing this. Mike Florio did the absolute best job of explaining this whole thing. IM not taking the time to do it again for those of you that werent talking about this weeks ago. But again, go check out the youtube video on Florio... his is the best.

Since my previous post I looked up the legal definition of rape. Apparently it varies from state to state. From what I could find, in Texas a couple of the things of which Watson was accused of fall under the definition of rape. That is based solely on things I've read online and what I haven't read are the actual legal documents that were part of the lawsuit. I tried searching for this Florio video, but could not find anything. Most stuff I read by Florio, he pretty much wants for Watson to shut up and just settle with his accusers. I'm all for following the facts, I just didn't know which specific fact to which you are referring. I didn't think you were wrong when you said Watson was never accused of rape. I just raised the question of where it falls in the definition of thing allegations against Watson. And since the definition of rape is so variable, it may apply to Watson and it may not. The legal documents may not have the word rape anywhere in them, but it still may apply in terms of definition. It all seems to be a matter of technicalities to me. It is splitting hairs at this point. I was mostly asking for myself than any type of rebuttal against you are anyone. Trying to feed my curiosity.
 
Top