CFZ What if: No kicker on game day

Jfconrow

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
682
As long as the punter can onsides kick it every time I’m good with that, it works in Madden.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
86,852
Reaction score
203,896
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
This would seem like a great idea when you're down by 2 with 5 seconds left and you have the ball at your opponent's 30 yard line.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,277
Reaction score
43,129
What if the Cowboys didn't carry a kicker?
- Either go for it on 4th or punt.
- 2 point conversions after TDs.
- Punter that can kick off.

Statistics indicate that teams would come out ahead in the long run with this approach.
- A high school coach made headlines a few years ago for always going for it on 4th down.
- Not sure if that was literally always, or if it was restricted to being on the favorable side of the 50 yard line.

A failed field goal is place at the spot of the kick.
- That's ~8 yards behind the line.

With the method I listed, they have the option to punt.
- If they are so close that punting into the endzone does not gain much, then failing by going for it does not lose much.

I think defenses and D-Coordinators would have that an offense always has 4 downs to convert.
- Envision all of the times the Cowboys made a big stop on 3rd down, then the opponent converted on 4th.
- I always want to opponent to punt in those situations.
Interesting problem to have, but not preferred.
Our kicker situation sounds less than optimal.
 

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,035
Reaction score
10,803
What if the Cowboys didn't carry a kicker?
- Either go for it on 4th or punt.
- 2 point conversions after TDs.
- Punter that can kick off.

Statistics indicate that teams would come out ahead in the long run with this approach.
- A high school coach made headlines a few years ago for always going for it on 4th down.
- Not sure if that was literally always, or if it was restricted to being on the favorable side of the 50 yard line.

A failed field goal is place at the spot of the kick.
- That's ~8 yards behind the line.

With the method I listed, they have the option to punt.
- If they are so close that punting into the endzone does not gain much, then failing by going for it does not lose much.

I think defenses and D-Coordinators would have that an offense always has 4 downs to convert.
- Envision all of the times the Cowboys made a big stop on 3rd down, then the opponent converted on 4th.
- I always want to opponent to punt in those situations.
I like the approach in general, but as the game gets to the end and you have more information and less time, the flexibility to get those 3 points is huge.
 

CoachD

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,267
Reaction score
2,352
Having a kicker ain't a big deal. Just put one out there and be done with it. Games are never won or lost because of a kicker. Punters are much more important.
See this is why I get banned because of posters like this that have no idea about the game of football!!!
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,491
Reaction score
15,655
Statistics are a measurement of what has been and not what will be. If I flip a coin and it comes up heads 4 times in a row, that says nothing about the next flip. Considering teams only attempt 4th down conversions ~20% of the time the numbers suffer from a lower sample size and don't say much.

Let's say teams adopt this strategy of no kicking. Guaranteed you would see a drop in 4th down conversion rate probably along the lines of the league average for 3rd downs, ~39%.
This is correct.
If a team has no kicker other teams would game plan and defend 2pt conversions much better.
There are no accurate stats for this because it hasn't been done just an assumption of "all other things would remain the same".

Reality is a great offensive team with powerful run game could probably get away with this.
BUT, they'd be risking injury and additional snaps for a very slight mathematical benefit.
 
Top