3rd time requesting. Did you look at the 2 videos and spot the difference? One would think you were avoiding doing so.
is it loose or does he have control? again the only way this comes in
Wrong. It comes in because the ball touched the ground he lost possession of it before regaining possession. He didn't "maintain" possession all the way through.
Item 1: Player Going to the Ground. If a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass (with or without contact
by an opponent), he must maintain control of the ball throughout the process of contacting the ground, whether in the field
of play or the end zone. If he loses control of the ball, and the ball touches the ground before he regains control, the pass
is incomplete. If he regains control prior to the ball touching the ground, the pass is complete.
There is no way around this. Black and white, bro. Here it is. Did the ball touch the ground and Dez temporarily lost control of it? Yes or no? This is why people try to imagine the ball never touched the ground because this is what the whole review hinged on. Then they move to, "but, but he was upright," "but, but, he already did a football move." It's the progression of avoidance and I've seen it dozens of times. Way ahead of it.
Exactly holding is holding same outcome no matter how bad it was....same for a football move or a lunge..there is not degrees of holding nor is there degrees of lunging..its a judgement call and there is no black and white about it in the rule book other than if it was it is this...not if it was this bad or this good it is this. your literally making my point ...
Your point is, these are judgment calls when the rules specifically tell you they are going to be judgment calls. So you want wiggle room to say you don't agree with a judgment call but also can't even begin to prove how their judgment call was wrong. So when you can't prove anything, you just insert haze to say, "well there's no sure fire way they could know."
They told you it was going to be a judgment call, so they judged it. This is the M.O. of the CONSPIRACY! folks on these boards and also stems from not wanting to accept a result they didn't want, like a loss.
And not every hold is a hold because the rules have exceptions where things look like holding but aren't per the rules. Again, people don't know this and swear up and down they see holding. But as for degrees of holding, there are. If you pull a string on a player from behind but don't "restrict" the player because the string gives way and didn't affect the player, that is not holding even though technically, it is. You pull a shirt tail and make the player go backwards, that is holding. There is a line and they judge it. Same with lunging.
So, for the 3rd time, are you going to watch those videos to compare them?
