MarionBarberThe4th
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,003
- Reaction score
- 4,985
10% heart zero percent luck and 100% reason to remember the name
-
Read the latest Dallas Cowboys News!Dallas Cowboys Newswire
Twitter: Helman: "To me, it looks like they’re setting Dak up to be a scapegoat."
- Thread starter PAPPYDOG
- Start date
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 55,286
- Reaction score
- 36,436
I’d argue Mahomes was Elite enough to lead KC to SB. And simply beat by a better team and arguably better QB.
And Stafford was probably closer to Elite all of those years on mostly dismal Lion teams and why one of the best offensive guru HC’s this era gave up so much to land him. Just saying…
Beastsfromthenfceast
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,776
- Reaction score
- 1,579
It is wat it is . Dak is at the top of his game and will never get any better . Just mediocre .
Diehardblues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 55,286
- Reaction score
- 36,436
Jethro and Son call sell and promote the hell out of Mediocre.
leeblair
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,926
- Reaction score
- 5,020
Dak is part of the problem - the biggest part. Him and the defensive line.
How can he simply be a scapegoat?
Hadenough
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,365
- Reaction score
- 12,615
That is all that really matters anymore. As long as Dak is putting people in the stands who cares how he performs in the playoffs.
Dak_Attack_09
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,222
- Reaction score
- 3,603
Mahomes went to a team that made it to several AFC championship games before he was in the NFL. He had top WR & TE in the league along with one of the best OL and it still took a choking Jimmy “g” overthrow for him to win a SB.
Once his line got exposed he wasn’t poo in the SB, looked like a chicken with its head cut off.
erod
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 37,799
- Reaction score
- 58,346
His QBR was terrible.
Stats mean nothing. They matter only to people who don't understand what they're watching.
TheSport78
The Excellence of Execution
- Messages
- 9,889
- Reaction score
- 2,866
You're confusing truth with opinion. Just because you BELIEVE something to be so, doesn't make it so. My opinion doesn't matter, but apparently yours does because it's different than mine. Get off of your high horse.
Silverz1972
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 2,579
- Reaction score
- 2,230
If you are making 40 million, you have to take on that responsibility to get things done regardless. Some talent is not there because they have to pay you.
buybuydandavis
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 23,751
- Reaction score
- 20,829
We were inevitably going to lose talent this year.
Last year we hit on cheapo free agents and had numerous key contributors still on their rookie contracts. We weren't going to get all those guys back at prices so low.
It should be much worse. Yet again we're pushing a good 20 million of Dak cap hit into the future.
In one sense we were so spoiled on the oline last year, with two legitimate starters as backups. On the other hand, even with all the top guys healthy, they laid an egg in the playoffs in the first round at home.
I'd like more depth. I'd like them to play better when it counts. We don't have the talent or the money. We spent our wad of what we had to spend, our first round pick, on the oline. We just don't have the resources for last year's depth, and are already engaged in deficit spending as is.
Verdict
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,003
- Reaction score
- 20,199
It pisses me off greatly that Creed Humphrey was there for the taking last year and we took a Rapping Project Bad Apple CB instead that will probably do nothing for us. Creed Humphrey will probably be in the conversation every year as, at minimum, a top 10 type of center in the league (if not the best in the league at some point).
It was high on our needs list, makes life for the offense a lot better, and just a far better pick.
- Messages
- 58,431
- Reaction score
- 56,012
David Helman includes in his argument the comparison of what the Kansas City Chiefs have done roster wise surrounding Patrick Mahomes. Well, he is referring to two different front offices.
On one hand, Jerry Jones & Company "believe" they have acquired optimal talent that was available to surround Dak Prescott. On the other hand, KC "knows" they have gotten the best players available. It is two different roster building philosophies within his comparison.
Jones does not think he is sabotaging Prescott. He believes he has given his quarterback the best tools any current general manager could secure for him under the same conditions. I doubt Jones sees Prescott as a possible scapegoat for that reason.
GINeric
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,230
- Reaction score
- 3,584
You haven't answered one question yet... no facts, no examples, no stats....
Ok. So you're one of those..... gotcha.
MarionBarberThe4th
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,003
- Reaction score
- 4,985
Daks games are boring
MarionBarberThe4th
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,003
- Reaction score
- 4,985
He’s not really a dynamic player
GINeric
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 4,230
- Reaction score
- 3,584
Well Dak doesn't play football by himself.... its a team game. Dak has a damn good winning percentage as a starting quarterback tho!!
Maybe you can answer this question for me.... how does such a boring quarterback like Dak put such an exciting quarterback like Romo into retirement??? I guess boring ain't TOO bad huh...