CFZ Michael Gallup’s impact

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,342
Reaction score
48,190
I didn't mean immediately top 5 or 10, though I'm sure there were some here who thought that would be the case.
Right or wrong, there are many out there that already think he is close to top 10.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-wide-receiver-rankings-2022/ofv5eqcn35bwt2hbhf9vvdwa
8th

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-wide-receiver-rankings-and-tiers-2022
12th

I think the NFL.com rankings had him 13th or 14th

He was 14th in the league last year among all WRs, but only a few yards shy of top 10....though I don't think of him as top 10.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,351
Reaction score
94,307
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
Right or wrong, there are many out there that already think he is close to top 10.

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/news/nfl-wide-receiver-rankings-2022/ofv5eqcn35bwt2hbhf9vvdwa
8th

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-wide-receiver-rankings-and-tiers-2022
12th

I think the NFL.com rankings had him 13th or 14th

He was 14th in the league last year among all WRs, but only a few yards shy of top 10....though I don't think of him as top 10.
I think he has the ability to be top 10 or better, if he's used right. Part of the reason he isn't living up to what I believe is his potential is that he so often has to stop or even come back for the ball, rather than catching it in stride and in space. His biggest asset was supposed to be his elusiveness and YAC, but that's hard to achieve from a standing (or landing) start.
 

Captain-Crash

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,265
Reaction score
33,397
I wonder If Daks personal protection gang will start a thread accusing Gallup of showing partiality to Rush by coming back from injury earlier than he should have…..

it may sound crazy but we’ve seen a thread here just about 1 particular throw from Rush and that he shouldn’t get any credit for it and than his twin starts another thread about Rush’s inaccuracy ranking, so again to disparage a 3rd rate backup.

If Rush and Gallup have a good game and chemistry we’ll be seeing threads to put that in a bad light as well……..it will send them over the edge.

I really hope that Dak gets back sooner so we not only have a veteran at the position but more importantly Daks personal gang will stop menstruating. It’s bloody embarrassing
yep, I hope they don't foul a plug Monday night.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,342
Reaction score
48,190
I think he has the ability to be top 10 or better, if he's used right. Part of the reason he isn't living up to what I believe is his potential is that he so often has to stop or even come back for the ball, rather than catching it in stride and in space. His biggest asset was supposed to be his elusiveness and YAC, but that's hard to achieve from a standing (or landing) start.
Our QB definitely is a see-it, then throw-it guy. Never has been a great throw the guy open, anticipation QB, though he has improved in that area.
It does limit a guy like Lamb.
Lamb would go nuts in KC or GB, for examples.
 

guag

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01
Messages
21,173
Reaction score
18,170
Didn't say that.

I said he would be the top WR on nearly half the teams, as those teams don't have "ideal" WR1s right now.

Then there are teams like the Bucs (when healthy), Chargers, Bengals, Dolphins, etc that might have two WRs that would be top dog on other teams.

Lamb would be the top WR on
  • Packers
  • Ravens
  • Cheifs
  • Jags
  • Bears
  • Patriots
  • Giants
  • Falcons
  • Steelers

and debatably (depending on one's opinion...I won't argue either way, but most rankings have him above them)
  • Panthers
  • Jets
  • Commanders
  • Titans
  • Texans
  • Colts
  • Broncos
  • Lions
I think pre-season, Sporting News had Lamb ranked the 8th best WR in the league.
That was too high, imo.
But almost everyone ranks him top 15-20.... whether that is right or not. My point was that he would be top dog on several teams.
Thank you for your detailed reply sir! Makes sense.
 

3rdEyewarrior

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,795
Reaction score
3,461
It’s exciting to see Michael Gallup is close to returning to game action. He is certainly a very underrated player on this team and should immediately help the offense get out of its slow start.

Looking at Gallup’s facts and stats, he has tended to get forgotten between Amari Cooper, Cedee Lamb, and his recent injury history. Here are some interesting stats on Gallup:
  • Ran a consistent 4.45 40 in pre-draft workouts.
  • In 4 seasons (55 games) he averages 15 yards per reception (Lamb avg about 13 per reception)
  • In 4 seasons he has 12 receptions of 40+ yards (Lamb has 5 in 2 years)
  • In Gallup’s best year- 2019- he had 66 receptions for 1,107 yds, avg 16.8 yds per catch.
  • His yards per target is 8.3- Lamb’s is 8.5.
I’m not knocking Cedee Lamb at all. But I am making the point that Michael Gallup may be exactly the kind of receiver to help Lamb not get doubled. Gallup is flat underrated. His return may inject some coverage respect among opposing defenses that we haven’t seen yet this year.
His official time was 4.51
 

Szczepanik

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1,705
Is Tolbert hurt? I haven’t kept up with why he has been inactive the first two games.
Great point. He suffered an ACL tear a little over 8 months ago. As bad as this team needs him, like you, I’m hoping this isn’t too soon.

As an orthopedic clinician, I worry about it being too soon. Not from a mechanical stability perspective, but the ability to control the limb and know where it is in space is impaired. The pivots and cutting concerns me. I hope I'm wrong.
 

Kingofholland

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,887
Reaction score
6,301
Gallup brings a different element to this offense as a deep threat. I don't know that I see Gallup as a number 1, but a good complimentary receiver if healthy.
 

zerofill

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,070
Reaction score
7,481
I love MG, but I also bear in mind that he was focused on less than Cooper and Lamb, by the defense. He does make some spectacular catches though.

Yeah he is a good 50/50 ball guy. But hell... who knows... I saw a whole new Noah Brown last game.
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,270
Reaction score
43,112
It’s exciting to see Michael Gallup is close to returning to game action. He is certainly a very underrated player on this team and should immediately help the offense get out of its slow start.

Looking at Gallup’s facts and stats, he has tended to get forgotten between Amari Cooper, Cedee Lamb, and his recent injury history. Here are some interesting stats on Gallup:
  • Ran a consistent 4.45 40 in pre-draft workouts.
  • In 4 seasons (55 games) he averages 15 yards per reception (Lamb avg about 13 per reception)
  • In 4 seasons he has 12 receptions of 40+ yards (Lamb has 5 in 2 years)
  • In Gallup’s best year- 2019- he had 66 receptions for 1,107 yds, avg 16.8 yds per catch.
  • His yards per target is 8.3- Lamb’s is 8.5.
I’m not knocking Cedee Lamb at all. But I am making the point that Michael Gallup may be exactly the kind of receiver to help Lamb not get doubled. Gallup is flat underrated. His return may inject some coverage respect among opposing defenses that we haven’t seen yet this year.
He can only make us better.
Welcome back Gallup
 

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,574
Reaction score
2,677
It’s exciting to see Michael Gallup is close to returning to game action. He is certainly a very underrated player on this team and should immediately help the offense get out of its slow start.

Looking at Gallup’s facts and stats, he has tended to get forgotten between Amari Cooper, Cedee Lamb, and his recent injury history. Here are some interesting stats on Gallup:
  • Ran a consistent 4.45 40 in pre-draft workouts.
  • In 4 seasons (55 games) he averages 15 yards per reception (Lamb avg about 13 per reception)
  • In 4 seasons he has 12 receptions of 40+ yards (Lamb has 5 in 2 years)
  • In Gallup’s best year- 2019- he had 66 receptions for 1,107 yds, avg 16.8 yds per catch.
  • His yards per target is 8.3- Lamb’s is 8.5.
I’m not knocking Cedee Lamb at all. But I am making the point that Michael Gallup may be exactly the kind of receiver to help Lamb not get doubled. Gallup is flat underrated. His return may inject some coverage respect among opposing defenses that we haven’t seen yet this year.
I agree Purple-Haze! Just having Gallop running wind-sprints should CeeDee get loose and if it doesn't then maybe CeeDee needs to be benched for a while to think about why he even wants to play football and if he comes up with the correct answer then let's see what CeeDee 2.0 can do.....................
 

chicago JK

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,761
Reaction score
1,289
I hope we all temper our expectations and do not get carried away if his impact is limited. He is coming back pretty fast from a serious injury and typically you see year two when you get the old player back. Maybe Gallup is the exception, but if it takes him a while he should not be the one blamed.
 

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,989
Reaction score
24,840
It’s exciting to see Michael Gallup is close to returning to game action. He is certainly a very underrated player on this team and should immediately help the offense get out of its slow start.

Looking at Gallup’s facts and stats, he has tended to get forgotten between Amari Cooper, Cedee Lamb, and his recent injury history. Here are some interesting stats on Gallup:
  • Ran a consistent 4.45 40 in pre-draft workouts.
  • In 4 seasons (55 games) he averages 15 yards per reception (Lamb avg about 13 per reception)
  • In 4 seasons he has 12 receptions of 40+ yards (Lamb has 5 in 2 years)
  • In Gallup’s best year- 2019- he had 66 receptions for 1,107 yds, avg 16.8 yds per catch.
  • His yards per target is 8.3- Lamb’s is 8.5.
I’m not knocking Cedee Lamb at all. But I am making the point that Michael Gallup may be exactly the kind of receiver to help Lamb not get doubled. Gallup is flat underrated. His return may inject some coverage respect among opposing defenses that we haven’t seen yet this year.
It’s clear by now that Lamb is a classic diva. Not sure yet if it will ruin him. Gallup has some dawg to him. They badly need that.
 

Runwildboys

Confused about stuff
Messages
50,351
Reaction score
94,307
CowboysZone DIEHARD Fan
It’s clear by now that Lamb is a classic diva. Not sure yet if it will ruin him. Gallup has some dawg to him. They badly need that.
"Diva"? He may not be meeting our expectations, but I don't see him as a diva.
 

Whyjerry

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,989
Reaction score
24,840
"Diva"? He may not be meeting our expectations, but I don't see him as a diva.

Hmmm...you think so? Lot of sizzle and no steak with him. Talented for sure but too many drops. Too many head scratching moments. I hope I am wrong.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
16,492
Reaction score
62,986
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Hmmm...you think so? Lot of sizzle and no steak with him. Talented for sure but too many drops. Too many head scratching moments. I hope I am wrong.
I think Lamb was drafted and anointed by JJ to be something he’s probably not- a dominant WR. Is he a really good WR? Yes. But more as a possession type receiver.

Lamb has played 34 games so far in his career, and I don’t think he’s a big deep threat or a guy with great hands. Doesn’t mean he’s not an excellent NFL receiver. He has playmaking skills and YAC capabilities. But he may be close to his ceiling as a receiver. Still too early to know for sure but I don’t see Lamb as a top 20 WR in this league.
 
Top