Do we miss Randy Gregory?

MWH1967

The Cook
Messages
7,035
Reaction score
9,362
After he though his penalties were funny last year, i have nothing left for him.

I'm a nope.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,485
Reaction score
15,652
I was the driver of the "Dallas got lucky RG left because Dorance is a better every down player at half the cost" train but I am not dunking on Gregory for getting injured.

All that said I will gladly gloat about the Broncos overpaying by quite a lot for a guy turning 30 with no history of sustained performance.

Randy was right to take that cash. Denver shouldn't let his agent back in their building ever again. Sold them snake oil on that deal at that price.
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
They say sometimes the best deal are the one that didn't happen. Dallas thought they had the deal done but last second Gregory pulled out and left for Denver and turns out very well for the Cowboys.
 

fredp22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,717
Reaction score
2,117
Quinn would have known how to use him and yes I would have liked him on the team but like a good coach Quinn is just excelling with what he has
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
77,322
Reaction score
95,967
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Pretty sure they wasn't.

I remember being bumfuzzled at how many people thought he was some kind of elite talent that we were letting get away.

I wish there was a poll done about that at the time so we could have receipts.

You are more than welcome to go back through all the posts and threads. :laugh:

Maybe it seemed like more was against it, because they bagged on Jerry for screwing up the contract. I think they wanted to bag on him and the FO more so than the thought of losing Gregory.
It could have been more 50 / 50, but seems like there were a lot more for him going than staying. Like I said, they wanted bag on the FO more.

Now I do recall some questioning it, more after they signed Fowler and Armstrong, then drafting Williams. Again more so to bag on the FO.
 

MountaineerCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,498
Reaction score
62,792
You are more than welcome to go back through all the posts and threads. :laugh:

Maybe it seemed like more was against it, because they bagged on Jerry for screwing up the contract. I think they wanted to bag on him and the FO more so than the thought of losing Gregory.
It could have been more 50 / 50, but seems like there were a lot more for him going than staying. Like I said, they wanted bag on the FO more.

Now I do recall some questioning it, more after they signed Fowler and Armstrong, then drafting Williams. Again more so to bag on the FO.
I'm sure it had something to do with bagging on Jerry, but it also had to do with people literally thinking Gregory was just an All-Pro waiting to happen but was being held back because of a dumb rule that kept getting him suspended.
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,353
Reaction score
13,719
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Do we miss a guy who is ok untill he misses games....no
 

UncleOscar

Well-Known Member
Messages
756
Reaction score
1,303
I was the driver of the "Dallas got lucky RG left because Dorance is a better every down player at half the cost" train but I am not dunking on Gregory for getting injured.

All that said I will gladly gloat about the Broncos overpaying by quite a lot for a guy turning 30 with no history of sustained performance.

Randy was right to take that cash. Denver shouldn't let his agent back in their building ever again. Sold them snake oil on that deal at that price.

We were one Stephen Jones last second contract paragraph insertion from buying that snake oil.
 

kevm3

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,691
Reaction score
12,707
The defense is playing well without him, but we very well could have made this potent defense even better. He's gone now though, so no point in speculating over it.
 
Top