Or neither.Hoofbite;3804247 said:Lets see........glasses or electrically induced psychotic eye movements..........
D-Mass15;3806392 said:umm... are 3D glasses really that bad in the first place? lol dude looks like he is about to have a seizure or something lol, I think ill stick with the harmless glasses lol
I'd still rather wear eye glasses than have two electrodes molest my eyelids for hours at a time.Hoofbite;3806431 said:Yes. They are.
Who the hell wants to wear glasses if you don't have too?
It'd be like wearing a colostomy bag so you don't have to use the bathroom the "old-fashioned" way.
D-Mass15;3806392 said:umm... are 3D glasses really that bad in the first place? lol dude looks like he is about to have a seizure or something lol, I think ill stick with the harmless glasses lol
KJJ;3806701 said:They showed a 3D monitor at a consumer electronics show in Vegas a few weeks ago that could produce the effect without the glasses. Everyone who saw the TV was impressed. Here's some info on 3D sets without the glasses.
http://www.tomsguide.com/us/3DTV-autostereoscopic-CES,review-1490.html