Do we win without Dez?

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,439
Reaction score
6,353
do we win without murray? do we win without romo? do we win without martin? do we win without beasley? do we win without rolando? do we win without tyron? please someone answer me!

Yes, we still win without Murray. What did Murray do tonight besides get his nice 100 yards? Randle could have came in, and got his yards.

No, we do not win without Romo, neither do we win without Dez. We need both. Without Dez, Romo has to throw to the likes of "Body Catch Williams", without Romo, Dez has to expose his body to poor thrown balls.

Beasley? Cut that **** out, we won many games where Beasley only has come in and caught 10 yards, and he went home to have dinner after.

T.Smith? Overall a ton of games, we could get by, it would be hard, but we could get by. He wasn't exactly great last night.

Rolando? Again the D was ***. RO is not the reason we win a game. He is just a nice extra out there.

You can't say the same for Dez or Romo though.
 

Hook'em#11

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,548
Reaction score
1,988
I don't agree with this at all.

Murray did do his job. Yes, the Giants game planned for him. And, he still got the yards. Helped this team.

No team is game planning for Randle..
 

chargrove

Member
Messages
611
Reaction score
9
I am only dismayed that Dez is now giving the Illuminati hand signal along with his X thing. It's the triangle he makes. That's Illuminati no joke...Jay Z is big time Illuminati.
 

Nexx

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,965
Reaction score
5,265
I am only dismayed that Dez is now giving the Illuminati hand signal along with his X thing. It's the triangle he makes. That's Illuminati no joke...Jay Z is big time Illuminati.

i really hope you dont really believe in that stuff....
 

sillycon

Active Member
Messages
941
Reaction score
162
We don't

We certainly don't win without Dez. Romo or no Romo today.

Who is Romo throwing the ball to, after the giants showed us, Murray is a non factor? I'm listening

The thing is, the offensive line is the one that bought time for Romo to get it to Dez. I'd argue why the heck did it take Dez that long to get open? I'm all for keeping Dez but not at the expense of possibly losing a piece of the offensive line. That line would allow good players to flourish without the need for a megastar...
 

Frozen700

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,439
Reaction score
6,353
The thing is, the offensive line is the one that bought time for Romo to get it to Dez. I'd argue why the heck did it take Dez that long to get open? I'm all for keeping Dez but not at the expense of possibly losing a piece of the offensive line. That line would allow good players to flourish without the need for a megastar...

Did you not see how they showed all game how they would double Dez? Guys would drop underneath all sneaky. Dez was doubled on that play, he needed to buy time to break free.

My thing is, With williams seeing 1 on 1 most of the time, how did he not break free on any of those plays were Romo had all day? He looked away from Dez multiple times to the other side of the field, then had to look back at him.
 

sillycon

Active Member
Messages
941
Reaction score
162
Did you not see how they showed all game how they would double Dez? Guys would drop underneath all sneaky. Dez was doubled on that play, he needed to buy time to break free.

My thing is, With williams seeing 1 on 1 most of the time, how did he not break free on any of those plays were Romo had all day? He looked away from Dez multiple times to the other side of the field, then had to look back at him.

With that time generated by the offensive line, would you not think any decent receiver would break free eventually? I think that offensive line allows you to have success with decent players who won't break the bank. That said, if you can find a way to keep Dez, do it. I just don't want it to the detriment of the team if we can't fill other areas with good players.
 
Top