Twitter: Vontae Davis: "We're not 35 pts worse than that team"

Risen Star · Dec 22, 2014

Davis: Yeah! We'll see you again! And I guarantee you won't beat us by more than 30!

Risen Star · Dec 22, 2014

The fake punt was a good call. It was wide open. We were out coached there and just got lucky he dropped it.

Yoshimitsu · Dec 22, 2014

They are pretenders. One and done.

jrumann59 · Dec 22, 2014

Risen Star said:
The fake punt was a good call. It was wide open. We were out coached there and just got lucky he dropped it.

True but the risk reward was too high. The risk you give it to your opponent well within FG range as long as they do not turn it over, the reward was 1st down. Too much momentum and the game would go your opponent.

jobberone · Dec 22, 2014

Risen Star said:
The fake punt was a good call. It was wide open. We were out coached there and just got lucky he dropped it.

I agree. They need to be more aware.

Doomsday101 · Dec 22, 2014

You know Davis if you did not want to get beat that bad, maybe you should have played better, instead you are using up energy defending your team when you could have used it to stop Dallas. lol

Zimmy Lives · Dec 22, 2014

Doomsday101 said:
You know Davis if you did not want to get beat that bad, maybe you should have played better, instead you are using up energy defending your team when you could have used it to stop Dallas. lol

Did he even play? I thought he sat it out.

Doomsday101 · Dec 22, 2014

Zimmy Lives said:
Did he even play? I thought he sat it out.

No one of the still shots was the sideline catch by Dez who went up and made a hell of a catch despite Davis interfering on the play

BAT · Dec 22, 2014

cowboys1981 said:
He's right, we're 38 pts better if Bailey doesn't miss lol

Or worse, if Randle does not fumble.

crashintonickdm · Dec 22, 2014

can you imagine the colts without luck?

Eric_Boyer · Dec 22, 2014

Risen Star said:
The fake punt was a good call. It was wide open. We were out coached there and just got lucky he dropped it.

that was an idiotic call. the risk/reward of getting a first down compared to turning the ball over at the 20 makes it an idiotic call.

Bullflop · Dec 22, 2014

GloryDaysRBack said:
I'm not upset over your post. I think it's foolish that so many people legitimately think teams with nothing to play for, just fold up shop and pack it in..it doesn't work that way...as a matter of fact, it's the exact opposite

Something tells me that the next team that plays Indy is likely to get a much more dedicated and focused effort than what was put forth yesterday. Of course, it'll help that some of the walking wounded are likely to return and contribute much more generously than those 3 backups that played on their OL yesterday. They're a better team than that -- perhaps not championship caliber just yet but if Luck gets better support next year, it'll surely help. The Cowboys are a fired up bunch right now. Let's hope they maintain that throughout the playoffs. It's been a long time coming, so that should help them sustain it. The culture has obviously taken a turn for the better.

GimmeTheBall! · Dec 22, 2014

guag said:
@GimmeTheBall! , is that you?

Nein, silly. He is my old friend Brain. He offen disagrees wit me but he is fair. very fair (are you reading this, Brain?). lHe is a good mans too.

GimmeTheBall! · Dec 22, 2014

may you be right, Vontae, but let's just say we is 1 point better. That is all we require.

GimmeTheBall! · Dec 22, 2014

links18 said:
The scoreboard begs to differ, Vontae.

there was a time when players half class. no more i am sorry to say.

Blackspider214 · Dec 22, 2014

Was Seattle 33 points better last year against Denver? No. But who cares. The end result is what matters. Sour grapes is what this is.

Tenkamenin · Dec 22, 2014

I'm still in shock of what i witnessed yesterday, this team got some dog in them. When was the last time if ever Luck was benched for poor performance?

guag · Dec 23, 2014

Tenkamenin said:
I'm still in shock of what i witnessed yesterday, this team got some dog in them. When was the last time if ever Luck was benched for poor performance?

I don't think the benching had much to do at all with Luck's performance, it was just a matter of not risking an injury to him with a game that they all but lost anyway, and they already have the division locked up. Why risk keeping him out there if they're just gonna lose anyway?

Was Luck's performance really that terrible on Sunday and therefore the catalyst for sitting him? No, I don't think so. I can't remember how many well-thrown balls that the Colts dropped, but if even one of those early drops are completed (like the drop on the fake punt), things could be a lot different.

Seven · Dec 23, 2014

Undisputed said:
But I don't care either way. Any team that doesn't bring their A game SHOULD be crushed by this team.

FINALLY.......

Next Years Champ · Dec 23, 2014

WoodysGirl said:

Its about matchups and dictating to the other team.

Good teams are good because they don't just attack you one way.

The Colts are an excellent team.

But they throw the ball with Luck and do not run the ball.

They also have some personnel issues on defense.

They did not tackle very well..

and they had penalties at crucial times in the game.

That's not Andrew Luck's area of responsibility.

They will not have to play Dallas but once this year.

Its not something I would worry about.

The Colts need to worry about Pittsburgh, Denver and New England.

Not us.

Twitter: Vontae Davis: "We're not 35 pts worse than that team"

Likes Collector

Likes Collector

Lurch

Well-Known Member

Kane Ala

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Mr. Fixit

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Cowboys Diehard

Junior College Transfer

Junior College Transfer

Junior College Transfer

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01

Messenger to the football Gods

Active Member