Supercowboy1986
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,204
- Reaction score
- 3,022
Gadaffi and saddam were bad people but I agree that they did handle the dirty work when dealing with the isis threats in their respective countries.
If that was the case what was the point of going after them? It seems like it did more bad then good the long run. Of course hindsight is 20/20 but having gadaffi and saddam was perhaps the lesser of 2 evils?
Neither was an ally by any stretch but you don't need to be an ally with someone who is already dealing with a major threat. It almost was like contract work except without the contact
If that was the case what was the point of going after them? It seems like it did more bad then good the long run. Of course hindsight is 20/20 but having gadaffi and saddam was perhaps the lesser of 2 evils?
Neither was an ally by any stretch but you don't need to be an ally with someone who is already dealing with a major threat. It almost was like contract work except without the contact
Of course this has been going on for awhile. We've been messing in the middle east since at least WW2.
The point is, these "dictators" that we keep taking out are actually doing our dirty work for us.
We wont go and shouldnt go spend the time and money to pick out ISIS murderers and kill them...but Gadaffi and Saddam had NO problem doing such.
We completely upset the balance of power, put all these countries in chaos. Then with a power vacuum we helped ISIS come in and be able to fill it. Now we're trying to arm the Kurds to have someone back in power that will work to take out ISIS. Vicious cycle.