Should we trade for Martavious Bryant?

Torturedcowboysfan said:

id rather trade for him than draft Ridley. They’re about the same age, but Bryant is cheaper and proven.

Click to expand...

jrumann59 said:

but isn't he one more positive drug test away from a 1 year susp?

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

That’s why you only trade a 4th

Click to expand...

jrumann59 said:

but isn't he one more positive drug test away from a 1 year susp?

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

id rather trade for him than draft Ridley. They’re about the same age, but Bryant is cheaper and proven.

Click to expand...

xwalker said:

Dez for Martavious.

Even if Martavious is banned for life I'll still make the trade.

I'll throw in TWill if needed.

Click to expand...

CapnB said:

4th? too high imo

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

Dez and M Bryant would be a lethal combination. He has moss like skills. He hasn’t peaked yet.

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

IF the contract is small, I'm down. But, we have to be able to get out of the contract if he should relapse. Frankly, I'd rather draft St. Brown in round 3. He'd be a BEAST with Dez assuming Dez stays. If not, St. Brown would still be a good move.

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

But m Bryant is proven.
Why not trade for Bryant and still draft him?

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

I don't want to give up a pick for him unless it's our second 5th comp or our 6th comp pick. I would prefer a player for player trade. I'd rather go Butler for M. Bryant. I think that would be a move that the Steelers could go for.

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

I don't want to give up a pick for him unless it's our second 5th comp or our 6th comp pick. I would prefer a player for player trade. I'd rather go Butler for M. Bryant. I think that would be a move that the Steelers could go for.

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

Here's the other part of my logic for trading Butler away. Even if we lose Dez, we would still have a boat load of WRs, assuming we draft another WR or get M. Bryant. Not to mention that we usually wind up with at least 5 UDFA WRs. Therefore, I think a Butler for Bryant trade would be better. It benefits us because we get a receiver and our WR depth isn't overly crowded. The Steelers are benefited because they still get a pretty good WR out of it.

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

Again, butlers a free agent and m Bryant is better and younger.

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

Butlers a free against and you won’t get him for a 6 th. You have to offer something the other team actually wants. Keep in mind that their goal is to improve their team too not help the cowboys.

Click to expand...

Furboy said:

Oh, didn't realize that in Butler's case.



I know, and we have a few other players that may be useful to them. Though, if we're looking at giving up a pick, we have 2 5s. I'd rather give up one of those picks if a 6 wouldn't be sufficient, but I'm not going higher for him if I were Jerry.

Click to expand...

Torturedcowboysfan said:

I’d trade a conditional 4th. If he ends up suspended, it becomes a 5th.

Click to expand...