How many Sacks did Dak prevent by running for his life?
If Dak wasn’t so mobile it would have been more han 4.
IMO, keeping Chaz Green around is simply this FO’s failure to accept they made a draft mistake. And Chaz Green having a “good attitude” won’t do anything to protect Dak.
Between his injuries and lack of performance in clutch situations, I’m at a complete loss for why Chaz Green is still on the roster. Is it another example of Jerry the owner “liking” a player when Jerry the GM knows dang well he should cut him? I just don’t get why this team continues to put any stock in this guy.
He did not give up 6 sacks. He gave up 4 and Bell gave up 2.
How many Sacks did Dak prevent by running for his life?
If Dak wasn’t so mobile it would have been more han 4.
Well smart guy, why don't you go ahead and tell us exactly how many times?
Well said X. And yes, a lot has been made of the disaster in Atl last year. But I get the feeling that because Green was a third round pick, he gets way too much leeway, and too much credit for playing in your own assessment, “1 bad game” and “3 good enough” games. That’s “good enough” for this team? That’s a pretty low bar IMO. I just find it very hard to believe we couldn’t do any better than Chaz Green as a backup.From a performance perspective, he has only had 1 bad game.
He has started 6 games and failed once.
The team will consider 2 things with him:
1: Performance
2: Injury Issues
If he had never been injured, his performance in 6 starts has been good enough.
1 horrible game
2 good games
3 good-enough games
Since teams generally don't evaluate players on just one game, his performance is not a reason he should be cut.
Since performance is not the reason to cut him, then it comes down to injury issues.
Since it really comes down to injury issues, the Atlanta game is not really relevant this preseason.
Fans love to find players to hate but with Green fans obsess about the Atlanta game which is a minor overall issue in his career. The major issue in his career is the Injury Problem; however, fans have spent 1000x more energy obsessing about the Atlanta game than his problem of being injury prone.
Well said X. And yes, a lot has been made of the disaster in Atl last year. But I get the feeling that because Green was a third round pick, he gets way too much leeway, and too much credit for playing in your own assessment, “1 bad game” and “3 good enough” games. That’s “good enough” for this team? That’s a pretty low bar IMO. I just find it very hard to believe we couldn’t do any better than Chaz Green as a backup.
Well smart guy, why don't you go ahead and tell us exactly how many times?
Given the current OL depth chart, I don't see Green making the final 53. Maybe someone gets hurt and he can stick but right now he is a long shot.
The two good games were in his 2 starts in 2016 at LT. He was good enough than many people at CZ didn't know after the season that Tyron missed those games.
The good-enough starts were at LG. Cooper became the LG because Green got injured, not because he was benched.
If somebody posted that he has been injured too often and should be replaced because of it, then I would not argue against that feeling.
My issue is the complete over-reaction to a players performance in 1 game and the corresponding narrative that he has always been terrible despite evidence to the contrary.
Personally I hope they have 9 guys that are unquestionably better than Chaz Green this coming preseason; however, until that happens the calls to cut Green, especially when the roster is at 90, don't make sense.
It should be a simple criteria for Green in the preseason:
Play in ALL preseason games without missing any due to injury in order to be considered for the 53 man roster. That would include not missing more than a couple of practices during training camp.
His performance in Atlanta likely has near-zero impact on the coaches in regards to evaluating him this preseason. Even moreso because of the new OL coach.
His injury history on the other hand must be strongly considered. It far outweighs his failure in 1 game.
They'll keep 9 or 8 OL.
TS
CW
TF
ZM
LC
Swing Tackle ( Fleming )
OC/OG backup (Looney)
That leaves 1 or 2 spots.
Green OT/OG
Marcus Martin OG/OC
Kadeem Edwards OG
Jake Campos OT
The two good games were in his 2 starts in 2016 at LT. He was good enough than many people at CZ didn't know after the season that Tyron missed those games.
The good-enough starts were at LG. Cooper became the LG because Green got injured, not because he was benched.
If somebody posted that he has been injured too often and should be replaced because of it, then I would not argue against that feeling.
My issue is the complete over-reaction to a players performance in 1 game and the corresponding narrative that he has always been terrible despite evidence to the contrary.
Personally I hope they have 9 guys that are unquestionably better than Chaz Green this coming preseason; however, until that happens the calls to cut Green, especially when the roster is at 90, don't make sense.
It should be a simple criteria for Green in the preseason:
Play in ALL preseason games without missing any due to injury in order to be considered for the 53 man roster. That would include not missing more than a couple of practices during training camp.
His performance in Atlanta likely has near-zero impact on the coaches in regards to evaluating him this preseason. Even moreso because of the new OL coach.
His injury history on the other hand must be strongly considered. It far outweighs his failure in 1 game.
They'll keep 9 or 8 OL.
TS
CW
TF
ZM
LC
Swing Tackle ( Fleming )
OC/OG backup (Looney)
That leaves 1 or 2 spots.
Green OT/OG
Marcus Martin OG/OC
Kadeem Edwards OG
Jake Campos OT
AT LEAST 2 more. Would have been 6 sacks.Well smart guy, why don't you go ahead and tell us exactly how many times?
no...Keeping Chaz around is the equivalent of keeping Matt Johnson around...it makes no sense if the guy can't stay on the field...and B...the player sucks.Keeping Chaz Green around is the equivalent of keeping Garrett around. Jerry would tell you that if we cut Green, we wont get the benefit of his learning from all the mistakes he has made.
no...Keeping Chaz around is the equivalent of keeping Matt Johnson around...it makes no sense if the guy can't stay on the field...and B...the player sucks.
IMO..neither has Green. lol...I get what you mean...but the end result should be the same. Chaz being kept on the roster is a waste of a roster spot. Good front offices realize when to wave the white flag on a player and cut bait. This kind of stuff is the difference in winning and losing. Someone gonna get cut and make another team if we keep Green yet again. Its just pure stubbornness.Matt Johnson never had a game much less a bad one.
That was horrible. What made it worse is we needed that game and he played like he had a party the night before the game and was hung over and probably forgot their was a game that day it was horribleLike his attitude, which might explain why he's still on the team...... He probably needs some preseason snaps at LT to get his confidence back. The fact they had him at RG for OTAs, makes FOUR positions where he's lined up on the OL.
https://247sports.com/nfl/dallas-co...s-himself-for-Atlanta-Falcons-game-119276386/
Chaz Green blames himself for Atlanta Falcons game
BySAM QUINN Jun 22, 3:39 PM
1
(Photo: Dustin Bradford, Getty)
Chaz Green is somewhat unique among offensive lineman, particularly in the star studded group that the Dallas Cowboys put on the field. Offensive lineman tend to be somewhat anonymous, particularly fringe starters, but if Green were to retire right now, he would forever be remembered for one game. With Tyron Smith injured ahead of last season's game against the Atlanta Falcons, Smith was forced to step in as the starter at left tackle. Adrian Clayborn proceeded to abuse him for six sacks in what was undoubtedly the worst game any offensive lineman has played in recent memory.
Green admitted to Drew Davison of The Fort Worth Star-Telegram that getting over that game has been difficult for him. That is especially true considering he doesn't have an outside excuse to blame the performance on. "When I watched it, I knew a lot of it was self-inflicted. That's what's so bad about it," Green said. "That's no disrespect to who I was going against. I just know my capabilities and I know I could’ve done better. I’m trying to work on those things and make sure that’s something I don’t go back to." Green wasn't hurt. He wasn't in a particularly bad matchup against a superstar edge rusher. He just played terrible football for the 60 worst minutes of the Cowboys season
If that truly bothered him that much, then he is not NFL material!!!!!!!!I'm with you on that Hawk. I think he was mind ****ed by having him practice in TC at LG then swinging him back to LT. IMO opinion that was completely on our O-line coordinator. It was his job and he failed to identify the strengths. He's gone now, moving on and hope Alexander is better at figuring out best fit
IMO..neither has Green. lol...I get what you mean...but the end result should be the same. Chaz being kept on the roster is a waste of a roster spot. Good front offices realize when to wave the white flag on a player and cut bait. This kind of stuff is the difference in winning and losing. Someone gonna get cut and make another team if we keep Green yet again. Its just pure stubbornness.
If that truly bothered him that much, then he is not NFL material!!!!!!!!