Doc50
Original Fan
- Messages
- 3,142
- Reaction score
- 3,430
He'd help us control time of possession since it takes him 5 minutes to run an out route.
He'd help us control time of possession since it takes him 5 minutes to run an out route.
Don’t see him coming back mid year. If ESPN were to fire him after this season it wouldn’t shock me to see him back. But he wasn’t a game changer by the end of his career. I don’t see the benefit for the Cowboys.
also, if you thought Witten was slow before.. wait until you see him after no OTAs, Training Camp, Preseason, and missing most of Reg Season
Witten is getting better at the mnf gig. If he walks away from that he may never get a lucrative announcing gig again. Just to play a few games?
I'd gladly take him back because he's better than what we have
It would start to free up Beez and the run game if Dak used him. He has never used the middle of the field much. But would love to see this. He can block and Dak is comfortable with him.Jason Witten 63 rec 560 yds 5 TD's
*Geoff Swaim 26 rec 242 yds 1 TD
Rico Gathers 2 rec 46 yds 0 TD's
Dalton Shultz 4 rec 32 yds 0 TD's
Essentially more production, a more reliable target for Dak, better blocker, and better redzone threat (our current problem area). Also the middle of the field has largely been non-existent since Witten retired.
Polar opposite on this one. Hard to come up with a reason they wouldn't benifit.
Id pay to see itDidn't he also predict Romo was gonna come out of retirement earlier in the year?
I think Ben is just like most of us...fandom wanting that 1 more shot for Witten and Romo
LOL, no doubt.Wonder where he got the idea from...
https://cowboyszone.com/threads/could-we-bring-witten-back-towards-the-end-of-the-year.421469/
That most Cowboys fans can tell us all how bad of a QB he is in the not so distant future?I saw a cryptic tweet from Danny White that simply said "I'm coming."
Any ideas on what it could mean?
I’m not seeing it. If you annualize the current production based on targets it’s basically in the same ballpark as last year. And you’re dead wrong about the blocking aspect. Witten’s blocking had deteriorated a lot by the end and he was consistently missing assignments and getting flagged about once every 3 or 4 games for holding or false start because he was “cheating” due to not being able to get to the assignment. And all that is a Witten that went through camp and was in game shape, etcetera. Whatever you’d get now would be a lesser version of 2017. Again, I don’t see what the benefit is for the Cowboys.Jason Witten 63 rec 560 yds 5 TD's
*Geoff Swaim 26 rec 242 yds 1 TD
Rico Gathers 2 rec 46 yds 0 TD's
Dalton Shultz 4 rec 32 yds 0 TD's
Essentially more production, a more reliable target for Dak, better blocker, and better redzone threat (our current problem area). Also the middle of the field has largely been non-existent since Witten retired.
Polar opposite on this one. Hard to come up with a reason they wouldn't benifit.
I’m not seeing it. If you annualize the current production based on targets it’s basically in the same ballpark as last year. And you’re dead wrong about the blocking aspect. Witten’s blocking had deteriorated a lot by the end and he was consistently missing assignments and getting flagged about once every 3 or 4 games for holding or false start because he was “cheating” due to not being able to get to the assignment. And all that is a Witten that went through camp and was in game shape, etcetera. Whatever you’d get now would be a lesser version of 2017. Again, I don’t see what the benefit is for the Cowboys.
He has good inside sources. He’s never wrong. In the past he knew Romo was going to retire before all of us. He knew Witten was going to retire before all of us. He knew The Cowboys would make a splash trade before it happened. Now he’s saying the Witten return is at 60%. Check his twitter feed they’re also talking about it on the fan.
Ok now I'm intrigued.You might want to look at Witten’s recent twitter feed.
I think Witten had one skill left by the end and that was the ability to find the gap in the zone and sit down. So he was still a weapon on third and short or around the goal line. But the trade off was he couldn’t stretch the field, couldn’t be used for TE screens, and he was becoming a borderline blocking liability. So if he came back he’d be a mixed bag. The problem was because he was a HOFer they felt forced to play him pretty much every snap unless they went empty and 5 WRs. It would have made more sense to use him situationally but that wasn’t going to happen.Maybe so. Still seems like Dak and Witten looked alot different than Dak and ???
All I know is folks made the claim we would be better without Dez or a number one receiver in general and I never bought that one either. Something tells me if Witten stepped back in this line-up even today, we would see an uptick in this offensive production even if it's a mediocre one.
Seems like it's as simple as production vs no production from my viewpoint. I know which one i'm taking.
Oh well, most likely never find out